RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Exploring the Implications of Fuzzy-set Analysis Method in Social Science: Beyond the Border of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methodologies

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105911585

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study explores the implications of Fuzzy-set Analysis method in social science, which combines a case-based qualitative method with a variable-driven quantitative method, and look at social diversity through comparative studies. The Fussy-set Ana...

      This study explores the implications of Fuzzy-set Analysis method in social science, which combines a case-based qualitative method with a variable-driven quantitative method, and look at social diversity through comparative studies. The Fussy-set Analysis method as QCA (qualitative comparative analysis) can deal with existing case studies and intermediate cases that regression analysis can not address (15~50 cases). It consists of Fussy-set Multiple Conjunctural Analysis and Fussy-set Ideal Type Analysis. The former defines the relationship between cause and effect as a necessary condition or a sufficient condition, through the technical processes: ‘Calibration’, ‘Operation’, ‘Evaluating set relations’ and ‘Reduction’. The latter analyzes the degree of belonging to each ideal type and the direction of the time series change by converting to the fuzzy membership score of continuous value between 0 and 1. In short, the fuzzy set analysis will allow active penetration into the areas covered by the variable-centric approach. It can be an alternative to the blind spot that the existing methodologies could not deal with and at the same time it can overcome these weaknesses.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 허태욱, "퍼지셋 분석을 통한 광역시·도 지역 시민사회단체 역량비교 연구" 서울연구원 19 (19): 141-157, 2018

      2 양재진, "복지국가의 저발전에 관한 실증 연구: 제도주의적 신권력자원론의 타당성 검토" 한국정치학회 46 (46): 79-97, 2012

      3 Gough, I., "Welfare states and environmental states: a comparative analysis" 25 (25): 24-47, 2016

      4 Kvist, J., "Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s: using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types" 9 (9): 231-252, 1999

      5 Ragin, C., "The comparative political economy of the welfare state" Cambridge University Press 299-319, 1994

      6 Bambra. C., "The Worlds of Welfare: Illusory and Gender Blind?" 3 (3): 201-211, 2004

      7 Ragin, C., "The Distinctiveness of Comparative Social Science, The Comparative method" University of California Press 1987

      8 Choi, Y. J., "Social science method: fuzzy ideal center of analysis and factor analysis" 15 (15): 307-337, 2009

      9 Ragin, C. C., "Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets and Beyond" University of Chicago Press 2008

      10 Snape, D., "Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers" Sage 2003

      1 허태욱, "퍼지셋 분석을 통한 광역시·도 지역 시민사회단체 역량비교 연구" 서울연구원 19 (19): 141-157, 2018

      2 양재진, "복지국가의 저발전에 관한 실증 연구: 제도주의적 신권력자원론의 타당성 검토" 한국정치학회 46 (46): 79-97, 2012

      3 Gough, I., "Welfare states and environmental states: a comparative analysis" 25 (25): 24-47, 2016

      4 Kvist, J., "Welfare reform in the Nordic countries in the 1990s: using fuzzy-set theory to assess conformity to ideal types" 9 (9): 231-252, 1999

      5 Ragin, C., "The comparative political economy of the welfare state" Cambridge University Press 299-319, 1994

      6 Bambra. C., "The Worlds of Welfare: Illusory and Gender Blind?" 3 (3): 201-211, 2004

      7 Ragin, C., "The Distinctiveness of Comparative Social Science, The Comparative method" University of California Press 1987

      8 Choi, Y. J., "Social science method: fuzzy ideal center of analysis and factor analysis" 15 (15): 307-337, 2009

      9 Ragin, C. C., "Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets and Beyond" University of Chicago Press 2008

      10 Snape, D., "Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers" Sage 2003

      11 Creswell, J. W., "Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions" Sage Publications 2007

      12 Rihoux, B., "Qualitative Comparative Analysis(QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advance and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research" 21 (21): 679-706, 2006

      13 석재은, "OECD 복지국가 지속가능성의 다차원적 평가와 지속가능 유형별 복지정책의 특성" 한국보건사회연구원 34 (34): 5-35, 2014

      14 Leeh, D. K., "Jiljeok Yeongu Bangbeoplon [Qualitative research methodology]" Kyoyuk Gwahaksa [Kyoyook Book] 2006

      15 Miller, G. J., "Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration" CRC Press 2007

      16 Gough, I., "Globalizatoin and regional welfare regimes: The east asian case" 1 (1): 163-189, 2001

      17 Ragin, C. C., "Fuzzy-set social science" University of Chicago Press 2000

      18 Kvist, J., "Fuzzy set ideal type analysis" 60 (60): 474-481, 2007

      19 Katz, H., "Fuzzy set approaches to the study of global civil society" 7 : 186-196, 2006

      20 Ragin, C. C., "Democratization and political culture in comparative perspective: Festschrift für Dirk Berg-Schlosser" 2005

      21 Rihoux, B., "Configurational comparative methods" Sage 2008

      22 Huh, T. W., "Comparing the Green Political Economy of OECD Countries through the Fuzzy-set Analysis" 2018

      23 Schneider, Carsten Q, "Case studies nested in fuzzy-set QCA on sufficiency: formalizing case selection and causal inference" 45 (45): 526-568, 2016

      24 Jung, Y. R., "Analysis of Policy Factors Affecting Fertility Rate by Country: Fuzzy Set Analysis for OECD Countries" 2014

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2018-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼