RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      예술흥행비자제도를 통한 이주여성 고용의 인권 문제와 법적 과제 - 인신매매에 대한 국제기준과 외국사례에 비추어 - = Human Rights Problems and Legal Challenges of Hiring Migrant Women through the Entertainer Visa System-Reviewing International Standards and Foreign Practices on Human Trafficking-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103127102

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The international community has been responding to human trafficking as one of the most compelling human rights issues for the last two decades. However, South Korea has yet to adopt a comprehensive law and policy addressing this matter and in-depth research has been lacking as well. This article reviews relevant international standards and domestic laws in other jurisdictions, including the United States, Australia and Taiwan, with a focus on the definition and interpretation of human trafficking. It also examines important decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights and national courts in other states. Based on this review, the article concludes that the human rights situations of migrant women who enter South Korea through the entertainer visa system and work in foreigner-only clubs amount to the level of human trafficking. Due to problematic legal systems, the absence of comprehensive policies, and judicial authorities` indifference to and lack of understanding of contemporary forms of human trafficking, human rights violations against these vulnerable migrants have been structurally and continuously produced. The law and policy on transnational human trafficking need to be understood in terms of preventing human rights violations against migrants and guaranteeing them effective remedies. A fundamental solution to the problem should begin with adopting and operating a legal system and policy aiming to prevent and eradicate the exploitation of vulnerable migrants and to effectively guarantee their human and legal rights.
      번역하기

      The international community has been responding to human trafficking as one of the most compelling human rights issues for the last two decades. However, South Korea has yet to adopt a comprehensive law and policy addressing this matter and in-depth r...

      The international community has been responding to human trafficking as one of the most compelling human rights issues for the last two decades. However, South Korea has yet to adopt a comprehensive law and policy addressing this matter and in-depth research has been lacking as well. This article reviews relevant international standards and domestic laws in other jurisdictions, including the United States, Australia and Taiwan, with a focus on the definition and interpretation of human trafficking. It also examines important decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights and national courts in other states. Based on this review, the article concludes that the human rights situations of migrant women who enter South Korea through the entertainer visa system and work in foreigner-only clubs amount to the level of human trafficking. Due to problematic legal systems, the absence of comprehensive policies, and judicial authorities` indifference to and lack of understanding of contemporary forms of human trafficking, human rights violations against these vulnerable migrants have been structurally and continuously produced. The law and policy on transnational human trafficking need to be understood in terms of preventing human rights violations against migrants and guaranteeing them effective remedies. A fundamental solution to the problem should begin with adopting and operating a legal system and policy aiming to prevent and eradicate the exploitation of vulnerable migrants and to effectively guarantee their human and legal rights.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "창원지방법원 통영지원 2012. 2. 1. 선고 2011고단6 판결"

      2 김춘진, "인신매매 피해자 보호 관련법 제도에 관한 국제세미나"

      3 국가인권위원회, "인신매매 피해 이주여성의 인권보호를 위한 서울국제회의"

      4 고현웅, "외국인 연예인 도입 실태조사 및 정책비교연구" 문화관광부, 국제이주기구 (IOM) 2006

      5 설동훈, "외국인 여성 엔터테이너의 일과 삶" 한국사회학회 2003

      6 여성가족부, "외국인 여성 성매매 실태 및 제도 개선방안 연구" 2011

      7 "수원지방법원 평택지원 2011. 10. 12. 선고 2011고단220, 2011고정56(병합)판결"

      8 "대법원 1999. 9. 17. 선고 98도2036 판결"

      9 "臺灣臺北地方法院100年度訴字第28號刑事判決"

      10 "臺灣新竹地方法院100年度審訴字第161號刑事判決"

      1 "창원지방법원 통영지원 2012. 2. 1. 선고 2011고단6 판결"

      2 김춘진, "인신매매 피해자 보호 관련법 제도에 관한 국제세미나"

      3 국가인권위원회, "인신매매 피해 이주여성의 인권보호를 위한 서울국제회의"

      4 고현웅, "외국인 연예인 도입 실태조사 및 정책비교연구" 문화관광부, 국제이주기구 (IOM) 2006

      5 설동훈, "외국인 여성 엔터테이너의 일과 삶" 한국사회학회 2003

      6 여성가족부, "외국인 여성 성매매 실태 및 제도 개선방안 연구" 2011

      7 "수원지방법원 평택지원 2011. 10. 12. 선고 2011고단220, 2011고정56(병합)판결"

      8 "대법원 1999. 9. 17. 선고 98도2036 판결"

      9 "臺灣臺北地方法院100年度訴字第28號刑事判決"

      10 "臺灣新竹地方法院100年度審訴字第161號刑事判決"

      11 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, "Travaux Préparatoires of the Negotiations for the Elaboration of the Unite Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto" United Nations Publication 2006

      12 U.S. Department of State, "Trafficking in Persons Report, Year 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016" 2004

      13 "Siliadin v. France (2005) 43 E.H.R.R. 16"

      14 "Sieders v R; Somsri v R (2008) 72 NSWLR 417"

      15 Ad Hoc Committee on the Elaboration of a Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, "Revised draft Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime"

      16 "Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia (2010) 51 E.H.R.R. 1"

      17 "R v Kovacs (2009) 2 Qd R 51"

      18 Sealing Cheng, "On the Move for Love: Migrant Entertainers and the U.S. Military in South Korea" University of Pennsylvania Press 2010

      19 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, "Model Law against Trafficking in Persons"

      20 United National General Assembly, "Interpretative Notes for the Official Records (Travaux Préparatoires) of the Negotiation of the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols thereto"

      21 Anne T. Gallagher, "International Law of Human Trafficking" Cambridge University Press 2010

      22 Rhacel Salazar Parreñas, "Illicit Flirtations: Labor, Migration, and Sex Trafficking in Tokyo" Stanford University Press 2011

      23 Yoon Jin Shin, "Human Trafficking and Labor Migration: The Dichotomous Law and Complex Realities of Filipina Entertainers in South Korea and Suggestions for Integrated and Contextualized Legal Responses" 48 (48): 2015

      24 Pei-Chia Lan, "Global Cinderellas : Migrant Domestics and Newly Rich Employers in Taiwan" Duke University Press 2006

      25 Council of Europe, "Explanatory Report on the Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings"

      26 Linda A. Malone, "Economic Hardship as Coercion Under the Protocol on International Trafficking in Persons by Organized Crime Elements" 25 (25): 54-94, 2001

      27 Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, "Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women – Republic of Korea"

      28 Ann Jordan, "Annotated Guide to the Complete UN Trafficking Protocol"

      29 Yoon Jin Shin, "A Transnational Human Rights Approach to Human Trafficking: Empowering the Powerless" Brill | Nijhoff 2017

      30 영상물등급위원회, "2016 영상물 등급분류 연감" 2016

      31 법무부 출입국, "2015년도 출입국⋅외국인정책 연감" 2016

      32 문화체육관광부, "2015 관광사업체 기초통계조사" 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2015-02-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Dankook Law Riview KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.56 0.53 0.68 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼