협동조합기본법상 임원의 민사책임확장규정에 대한 검토 = A Study on the Provisions on Extension of Civil Liabilities of Director in Framework Act on Cooperatives

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There are some differences in the provisions regarding extension of civil liabilities of director between Framework Act on Cooperatives and Agricultural Cooperative Act (and other Cooperative Acts and Commercial Law, etc). The paper reviews the differences and their legal meanings. Futhermore, the paper points out that ‘the stipulation extending the Director`s Civil Liabilities in the Framework Act on Cooperatives has several unconstitutional and legally controversial points. Specifically, the article that stipulates that “the director who didn`t express the opposition in a definite manner during the board of directors should be regarded as a director who voted yes on the agenda, and consequently the director should take on the legal joint liabilities for the damages”. has several unconstitutional points, according to the general constitutional theories (like Principle of Proportionality (Principle of Excess Prohibition; Prinzip des Ubermaßverbot) and the Principle of Civil Liabilities) that have been established by many legal scholars and judicial precedents. The paper proposes that Framework Act on Cooperatives should be revised through resolving the inconsistency and the unconstituionality issues. More specifically, the article that stipulates that “the director who didn`t express the opposition in a definite manner during the board of directors should be regarded as a director who voted yes on the agenda” must be revised into the article that stipulates that “the director who was recorded not to raise the issue during the board of directors in the Board of Directors Meeting Minutes should be presumed as a director who voted yes on the agenda” in order to give the director the opportunity to overthrow the legal effect of taking on the legal joint liabilities for the damages by presenting counterevidence during trial.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 기획재정부, 2013

2 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2013

3 이선신, "협동조합기본법상의 선거관련규정에 대한 검토" 한국협동조합학회 30 (30): 29-60, 2012

4 하원준, "협동조합기본법 해설" 문성 2013

5 손낙구, "협동조합기본법 제정의 경과와 취지" 2013

6 강현철, "협동조합기본법 입법체계 분석 연구" 2013

7 박범용, "협동조합기본법 어렵지 않게 이해하는 비법" (사)한국협동조합연구소 (재창간 7) : 2012

8 이선신, "협동조합기본법 시행에 부치는 유감(遺憾)"

9 양동수, "협동조합기본법 개정관련 주요쟁점과 입법방향 논의" 2013

10 최병록, "협동조합기본법" 법문사 2013

11 장종익, "협동조합 원칙에 비추어 본 농협법의 문제점과 개선방향" 한국협동조합학회 21 (21): 177-217, 2003

12 김용한, "협동조합 설립과 운영실무" 지식공감 2013

13 이선신, "협동조합 선거법규" 동방문화사 2013

14 이선신, "협동조합 경영법규" 동방문화사 2013

15 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2008

16 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 2005

17 김용구, "한국회사법론" 디비북스 2011

18 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2005

19 김성탁, "판례분석 회사법 제2권" 인하대학교출판부 2012

20 서정근, "주석실무 개정상법총람" 홍문관 551-, 1984

21 전형수, "수산업협동조합법 개정에서 본 임원추천위원회의 문제점과 대안" 한국협동조합학회 28 (28): 51-70, 2010

22 최기원, "상법학원론" 박영사 2003

23 서돈각, "상법강의(상)" 법문사 455-, 1999

24 박범용, "민간 입법실무 책임자가 직접 작성한 협동조합기본법 긴급해설서"

25 농협중앙회, "농협법(기본도서)" 삼보인쇄공사 2012

26 이선신, "농협법 제8조의 규범적 의의에 대한 검토 -대법원 1995.2.3. 선고 94누2985 판결의 내용을 중심으로-" 한국협동조합학회 28 (28): 87-115, 2010

27 법제처, "농업협동조합법 해설"

28 전현정, "구 상호신용금고법상 임원의 예금주에 대한 책임" (75) : 2008

29 정진세, "舊 相互信用金庫(現 相互貯畜銀行) 任員 및 寡占株主의 預金債務 連帶辨濟責任 - 대상판결 : 대법원 2008.4.10. 선고, 2004다68519 판결 [양수금] -" 대한변호사협회 (390) : 202-233, 2009