RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      비인두 기도유지기를 사용한 비위관 삽입 = The Insertion of a Nasogastric Tube with a Nasopharyngeal Airway

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104382955

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: The insertion of a nasogastric tube can be difficult in an anesthetized patient who has a cuffed endotracheal tube in place. The placement of a silastic nasogastric (NG) tube can lead to nasal bleeding or a submucosal dissection in the p...

      Background: The insertion of a nasogastric tube can be difficult in an anesthetized patient who has a cuffed endotracheal tube in place. The placement of a silastic nasogastric (NG) tube can lead to nasal bleeding or a submucosal dissection in the posterior pharynx. The aim of this study was to determine if the insertion of a nasogastric tube with a nasophryngeal airway can be made easy.
      Methods: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups; Group 1 and Group 2. For Group 1, a nasogastric tube was inserted first. If this method was not successful with two consecutive attempts, then a nasogastric tube with a nasopharyngeal airway was inserted and if unsuccessful again with two attempts, then Magill forceps were used under laryngoscopy. For Group 2, a nasogastric tube with a nasopharyngeal airway was inserted first. If this method was not successful with two consecutive attempts, then a nasogastric tube was inserted and if unsuccessful again with two attempts, then Magill forceps were used under laryngoscopy.
      Results: The success rate of the 1st pass in Group 2 was significantly higher than in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The success rate with the 1st intended method in Group 2 was significantly higher than in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The rate of using Magill forceps was not significantly different between the two groups.
      Conclusions: The insertion of a nasogastric tube with a nasopharyngeal airway in anesthetized and intubated patients is effective in increasing success rate of insertion. Nasopharyngeal airway traverses the nasopharynx atraumatically and serves as a conduit for the smaller nasogastric tube. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2006; 50: 127~31)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Usefulness of nasogastric decompression following elective gastric cancer surgery:a randomized prospective study" 62 : 52-56, 2002

      2 "Simple and reliable methods of inserting a nasogastric tube during anaesthesia" 45 : 234-, 1973

      3 "Routine nasogastric decompression is not necessary in elective gastirc cancer surgery" 61 : 578-582, 2001

      4 "Oro- and nasogastric tube passage in intubated patients:fiberoptic description of where they go at the laryngeal level and how to make them enter the esophagus" 91 : 137-143, 1999

      5 "Insertion of the nasogastric tube made easy" 101 : 266-, 2004

      6 "Insertion of difficult nasogastric tubes through a nasoesophgeally placed endotracheal tube" 15 : 876-7, 1987

      7 "Inadvertent intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube in a patient with severe head trauma" 147 : 668-9, 1992

      8 "Iatrogenic perforation of the esophagus by a nasogastric tube" 147 : 423-5, 1984

      9 "Forward displacement of the larynx for nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patients" 13 : 204-5, 1985

      10 "Feeding tube introduction" 7 : 349-50, 1979

      1 "Usefulness of nasogastric decompression following elective gastric cancer surgery:a randomized prospective study" 62 : 52-56, 2002

      2 "Simple and reliable methods of inserting a nasogastric tube during anaesthesia" 45 : 234-, 1973

      3 "Routine nasogastric decompression is not necessary in elective gastirc cancer surgery" 61 : 578-582, 2001

      4 "Oro- and nasogastric tube passage in intubated patients:fiberoptic description of where they go at the laryngeal level and how to make them enter the esophagus" 91 : 137-143, 1999

      5 "Insertion of the nasogastric tube made easy" 101 : 266-, 2004

      6 "Insertion of difficult nasogastric tubes through a nasoesophgeally placed endotracheal tube" 15 : 876-7, 1987

      7 "Inadvertent intracranial placement of a nasogastric tube in a patient with severe head trauma" 147 : 668-9, 1992

      8 "Iatrogenic perforation of the esophagus by a nasogastric tube" 147 : 423-5, 1984

      9 "Forward displacement of the larynx for nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patients" 13 : 204-5, 1985

      10 "Feeding tube introduction" 7 : 349-50, 1979

      11 "Factors affecting nasogastric tube insertion" 12 : 52-3, 1984

      12 "Another technique for insertion of nasogastric tubes" 50 : 374-, 1979

      13 "An alternate method for nasogastric tube insertion" 53 : 436-, 1980

      14 "A simpler method of nasogastric tube insertion" 58 : 107-, 1983

      15 "A method to reduce nasopharyngeal trauma from nasogastric tube placement" 78 : 410-1, 1994

      16 "A method of inserting a nasogastric tube in the anesthetized or comatose patient" 50 : 179-80, 1971

      17 "A complication of nasogastric intubation:pulmonary hemorrhage" 59 : 356-8, 1983

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼