RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      What determines human value? Well-being and the primacy of moral considerations in human valuations

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109405912

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the present research, we examined how individuals weigh 4 key dimensions of person perception (competence, warmth, morality, attractiveness) in judgments of human value and whether evaluators’ level of well-being moderates these judgments. Participants in the U.S. (Study 1) and South Korea (Study 2) assigned social credit scores to 8 versions of a target, described as possessing positive or negative traits on each of the 4 dimensions. In both Studies 1 and 2, the valuation difference between the positive and negative conditions was greatest for the morality dimension, indicating that valuations were influenced most by moral considerations. Importantly, this effect was moderated by evaluators’ well-being (happiness), such that the weight given to moral information was amplified among those who reported higher (vs. lower) well-being. Together, our findings suggest that morality figures most prominently in human valuations, and more so for happy individuals.
      번역하기

      In the present research, we examined how individuals weigh 4 key dimensions of person perception (competence, warmth, morality, attractiveness) in judgments of human value and whether evaluators’ level of well-being moderates these judgments. Partic...

      In the present research, we examined how individuals weigh 4 key dimensions of person perception (competence, warmth, morality, attractiveness) in judgments of human value and whether evaluators’ level of well-being moderates these judgments. Participants in the U.S. (Study 1) and South Korea (Study 2) assigned social credit scores to 8 versions of a target, described as possessing positive or negative traits on each of the 4 dimensions. In both Studies 1 and 2, the valuation difference between the positive and negative conditions was greatest for the morality dimension, indicating that valuations were influenced most by moral considerations. Importantly, this effect was moderated by evaluators’ well-being (happiness), such that the weight given to moral information was amplified among those who reported higher (vs. lower) well-being. Together, our findings suggest that morality figures most prominently in human valuations, and more so for happy individuals.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼