RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Online Arbitration in China: Practices and Issues

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105026666

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Online arbitration has great potential in resolving e-commerce and conventional business disputes. To facilitate the development of online arbitration, legal barriers need to be removed. This article considers main legal issues of online arbitration in China and proposes amendment to Chinese arbitration law, in particular, the recognition of the validity of electronic arbitration agreements and awards. According to the online arbitration practices in China, the entire arbitration process is conducted using online communication methods which are cost-effective and efficient.
      However, legal barriers need to be removed to facilitate the development of online arbitration.
      번역하기

      Online arbitration has great potential in resolving e-commerce and conventional business disputes. To facilitate the development of online arbitration, legal barriers need to be removed. This article considers main legal issues of online arbitration i...

      Online arbitration has great potential in resolving e-commerce and conventional business disputes. To facilitate the development of online arbitration, legal barriers need to be removed. This article considers main legal issues of online arbitration in China and proposes amendment to Chinese arbitration law, in particular, the recognition of the validity of electronic arbitration agreements and awards. According to the online arbitration practices in China, the entire arbitration process is conducted using online communication methods which are cost-effective and efficient.
      However, legal barriers need to be removed to facilitate the development of online arbitration.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 李虎, "网上仲裁法律问题研究" 中国民主法制出版社 2005

      2 Lucille M. Ponte, "Throwing Bad Money after Bad: Can Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) really Deliver the Goods for the Unhappy Internet Shopper?" 55 : 88-89, 2001

      3 Shen Sibao, "The Challenges for Online Arbitration in the EU and China" The Report for EUChina Information Society Project Analysis on Online Arbitration 2008

      4 Ethan Katsh, "Ten Years of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Looking at the Past and Constructing the Future" 19 : 21-32, 2006

      5 Ethan Katsh, "Online Dispute Resolution" Jossey ‐Bass 45-70, 2001

      6 Philippe Fouchard, "Fouchard Gailllard Goldman on International Commercial arbitration" Kluwer Law International 429-, 1999

      7 Tania Sourdin, "Alternative Dispute Resolution(the second edition)" 213-, 2005

      8 Juan Pablo Cortes Dieguez, "A European Legal Perspective on Consumer ODR" 15 (15): 90-100, 2009

      1 李虎, "网上仲裁法律问题研究" 中国民主法制出版社 2005

      2 Lucille M. Ponte, "Throwing Bad Money after Bad: Can Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) really Deliver the Goods for the Unhappy Internet Shopper?" 55 : 88-89, 2001

      3 Shen Sibao, "The Challenges for Online Arbitration in the EU and China" The Report for EUChina Information Society Project Analysis on Online Arbitration 2008

      4 Ethan Katsh, "Ten Years of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Looking at the Past and Constructing the Future" 19 : 21-32, 2006

      5 Ethan Katsh, "Online Dispute Resolution" Jossey ‐Bass 45-70, 2001

      6 Philippe Fouchard, "Fouchard Gailllard Goldman on International Commercial arbitration" Kluwer Law International 429-, 1999

      7 Tania Sourdin, "Alternative Dispute Resolution(the second edition)" 213-, 2005

      8 Juan Pablo Cortes Dieguez, "A European Legal Perspective on Consumer ODR" 15 (15): 90-100, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-02-10 학술지명변경 한글명 : 경원법학 -> 가천법학
      외국어명 : Kyungwon Law Review -> Gachon Law Review
      KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.55 0.55 0.49
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.42 0.38 0.638 0.44
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼