약탈문화재의 압류면제에 관한 헌법적 검토 = Constitutional Review about the Seizure Immunity of Looted Cultural properties

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, a study was carried out to legislate the Immunity(exemption) of temporary seizure of Korean Cultural Heritage Overseas for the revitalization of the exhibition, and a bill to amend the “Museum and Art Gallery Support Act” was introduced to the National Assembly to institutionalize the seizure immunity(exemption) system.
The international position on the seizure immunity system has is also generally changing positively, and the 1972 European Convention on State Immunity and the 2004 United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of State and Their Property have been concluded. And Many countries are participating in the Convention or engaging in multilateral treaty to promote the display of cultural properties.
The Constitution of Korea prescribes the principle of cultural state and guarantees the right of cultural equality as fundamental rights. However, the cultural right, the right for enjoyment of culture, and the right for enjoyment of cultural properties guaranteed by the Framework Act on Culture and the Cultural Heritage Protection Act can be interpreted as statutory rights of citizens and local residents rather than as fundamental rights in the Constitution. Therefore, the Immunity seizure for the domestic exhibition of Korean cultural heritage overseas can be seen as positive in terms of the principle of cultural state and guarantee of the people’s rights. However, looted cultural properties taken out by illegal looting can be subject to restitution but can not be subject to immunity seizure. The immunity seizure system can make mistakes in acknowledging the ownership of the occupied state, and there is room for misapplication.
In order to revitalize domestic exhibitions of Korean cultural heritage overseas, it is possible to allow immunity of seizure in terms of ‘common heritage of mankind’, but it is possible to make clear the constitutional basis as ‘national cultural heritage’.
It is necessary to take a careful approach to immunity seizure of looted cultural properties which is supposed to be unconstitutional in Korean Constitution which presupposes the principle of cultural state and anti-imperialist ideals and guarantees property rights.
The immunity seizure shall be determined by carefully examining the route of export of the cultural heritage. Passively, cultural properties that are obviously illegal to flow out, or cultural property in dispute with ownership are excluded from immunity seizure, and cultural property exported by law such as diplomacy, trade, or donation should be exempted from seizure. In other words, it is necessary to clarify the requirements of the immunity seizure cultural properties, and to list the immunity seizure cultural properties. A more careful design is required in order to go through procedural steps such as deliberation by the deliberation committee and consultation of cultural property experts.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 남궁승태, "헌법상의 문화국가와 문화재보호" 아세아태평양공법학회 3 : 53-90, 1994

2 박종현, "헌법상 문화국가원리의 구체화와 헌법재판에서의 적용 - 헌재 2014.4.24. 2011헌마659등 결정에 대한 검토와 더불어 -" 한국헌법학회 21 (21): 527-568, 2015

3 이세주, "헌법상 문화국가원리에 대한 고찰" 세계헌법학회한국학회 21 (21): 27-63, 2015

4 정준호, "해외문화유산의 환수기능 강화방안 연구" 한국자치행정학회 27 (27): 359-379, 2013

5 성봉근, "해외 문화재 등의 국내 전시에 대한 법적 규제 ― 문화행정법의 새로운 과제 ―" 한국공법학회 46 (46): 295-332, 2017

6 김태식, "한일간 문화재 반환, 우리를 반추한다" 국민대학교 일본학연구소 8 : 38-58, 2010

7 김수갑, "한국헌법에서의 '문화국가' 조항의 법적 성격과 의의" 한국공법학회 32 (32): 179-198, 2004

8 장신, "판례로 본 국가면제의 형성" 연세법학회(구 연세법학연구회) 2 (2): 683-702, 1992

9 오승규, "전시활성화를 위한 한시적 압류면제데 대한 비교법적 고찰" 9-39, 2018

10 최용전, "약탈문화재의 압류면제에 관한 헌법적 검토" 41-50, 2018

11 김수갑, "문화재향유권의 법리에 관한 고찰－일본에서의 논의와 한국헌법상의 법리구성을 중심으로－" 법과사회이론학회 23 : 227-262, 2002

12 오세탁, "문화재보호법연구-문화재향유권의 법리를 중심으로-" 한국공법학회 13 : 285-293, 1985

13 제성호, "문화재 불법이동의 국제법적 규제 - 약탈 문화재의 반환을 중심으로 -" 법조협회 54 (54): 70-109, 2005

14 이종수, "문화기본권과 문화법제의 현황 및 과제" 한국공법학회 43 (43): 1-20, 2015

15 김재광, "문화국가원리에서 바라본 문화재 환수와 대여문화재의 한시적 압류면제" 법학연구소 42 (42): 493-516, 2018

16 김수갑, "문화국가를 위한 법체계 검토" 한국문화관광연구원 18 : 9-46, 2007

17 송호영, "국제사법상 문화재의 기원국법주의(lex originis)에 관한 연구" 한국재산법학회 30 (30): 79-109, 2013

18 최태현, "국제법상 '면제'제도의 기본적 쟁점에 대한 분석" 국제법평론회 (29) : 1-27, 2009

19 이주형, "국외 미술품의 전람회 활성화를 위한 미술품 압류금지법에 관한 연구 - 공적문화향유권과 사적 소유권의 경합을 중심으로 -" 한국문화관광연구원 26 (26): 56-79, 2012

20 유형석, "국가면제의 제한에 관한 국제적 동향" 한국법학회 (34) : 443-463, 2009

21 류시조, "韓國 憲法上의 文化國家原理에 관한 硏究" 한국헌법학회 14 (14): 247-272, 2008