RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Reliability and Validity of an Ultrasonic Device for Measuring Height in Adults

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107851168

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: The ultrasonic stadiometer was originally developed as a device to measure and monitor children’s height. However, an ultrasonic stadiometer (InLab S50; InBody Co., Seoul, Korea) was used to measure adults’ height in the 2018 Korea Com...

      Background: The ultrasonic stadiometer was originally developed as a device to measure and monitor children’s height. However, an ultrasonic stadiometer (InLab S50; InBody Co., Seoul, Korea) was used to measure adults’ height in the 2018 Korea Community Health Survey (KCHS). This study was conducted to assess the reliability and validity of the InLab S50 in adults.
      Methods: The study subjects were 120 adults (reliability test, n=20; validity test, n=100) who had visited a health screening center. The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of InLab S50 were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement between InLab S50 and an automatic stadiometer (HM-201; Fanics, Busan, Korea) was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.
      Results: The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities of the InLab S50 were excellent (ICC=0.9999 and 0.9998, respectively). The correlation coefficient of the height measured by the two measurement devices was very high (r=0.996). The difference (Δheight [HM-201-InLab S50]) was -0.15±0.78 cm (95% limit of agreement [LOA], -1.69 to 1.38). After excluding the values outside 95% LOA, the difference was further reduced to -0.05±0.59 cm (95% LOA, -1.20 to 1.10).
      Conclusion: This study showed that the InLab S50 is a reliable and valid device for the measurement of adults’ height. Therefore, we think that InLab S50 could be used to measure adults’ height in household health surveys such as the KCHS.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kjellberg J, "The socioeconomic burden of obesity" 10 : 493-502, 2017

      2 Guh DP, "The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 9 : 88-, 2009

      3 Kong KA, "Statistical methods : reliability assessment and method comparison" 40 : 9-16, 2017

      4 윤진환, "Prevalence of Obesity and Incidence of Obesity-Related Comorbidities in Koreans Based on National Health Insurance Service Health Checkup Data 2006-2015 (J Obes Metab Syndr 2018;27:46-52)" 대한비만학회 27 (27): 195-197, 2018

      5 Fernihough A, "Physical stature decline and the health status of the elderly population in England" 16 : 30-44, 2015

      6 Bland JM, "Measuring agreement in method comparison studies" 8 : 135-160, 1999

      7 Sorkin JD, "Longitudinal change in height of men and women : implications for interpretation of the body mass index : the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging" 150 : 969-977, 1999

      8 Yang Wha Kang, "Korea Community Health Survey Data Profiles" 질병관리본부 6 (6): 211-217, 2015

      9 InBody, "InBody the pioneer" InBody Co. Ltd

      10 Huang W, "Health, height, height shrinkage, and SES at older ages: evidence from China" 5 : 86-121, 2013

      1 Kjellberg J, "The socioeconomic burden of obesity" 10 : 493-502, 2017

      2 Guh DP, "The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight : a systematic review and meta-analysis" 9 : 88-, 2009

      3 Kong KA, "Statistical methods : reliability assessment and method comparison" 40 : 9-16, 2017

      4 윤진환, "Prevalence of Obesity and Incidence of Obesity-Related Comorbidities in Koreans Based on National Health Insurance Service Health Checkup Data 2006-2015 (J Obes Metab Syndr 2018;27:46-52)" 대한비만학회 27 (27): 195-197, 2018

      5 Fernihough A, "Physical stature decline and the health status of the elderly population in England" 16 : 30-44, 2015

      6 Bland JM, "Measuring agreement in method comparison studies" 8 : 135-160, 1999

      7 Sorkin JD, "Longitudinal change in height of men and women : implications for interpretation of the body mass index : the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging" 150 : 969-977, 1999

      8 Yang Wha Kang, "Korea Community Health Survey Data Profiles" 질병관리본부 6 (6): 211-217, 2015

      9 InBody, "InBody the pioneer" InBody Co. Ltd

      10 Huang W, "Health, height, height shrinkage, and SES at older ages: evidence from China" 5 : 86-121, 2013

      11 Glock M, "Gulliver G-100 : a new device to evaluate daily growth measurement in comparison with Harpenden stadiometer" 52 : 287-290, 1999

      12 Kweon S, "Data resource profile : the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANES)" 43 : 69-77, 2014

      13 Yeo Rin Park, "Comparison of Obesity and Overweight Prevalence Among Korean Adults According to Community Health Survey and Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey" Korean Society for the Study of Obesity 23 (23): 64-, 2014

      14 Madden AM, "Body composition and morphological assessment of nutritional status in adults : a review of anthropometric variables" 29 : 7-25, 2016

      15 Ng CD, "Biases in self-reported height and weight measurements and their effects on modeling health outcomes" 7 : 100405-, 2019

      16 Frid H, "Agreement between different methods of measuring height in elderly patients" 26 : 504-511, 2013

      17 Watt V, "A comparison of ultrasonic and mechanical stadiometry" 78 : 269-270, 1998

      18 서미혜, "2018 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity Guideline for the Management of Obesity in Korea" 대한비만학회 28 (28): 40-45, 2019

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-09-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 가정의학회지 -> Korean Journal of Family Medicine KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-12-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine -> Korean Journal of Family Medicine KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.24 0.26 0.54 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼