RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      소비자법상 양벌규정에 관한 연구 -전자상거래소비자보호법상 양벌규정을 중심으로- = A Study on the Concurrent Punishmentof Consumer Acts

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101248960

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A provision of concurrent punishment is a provision that punishes corporations as well as employees. But the constitutional court decided that A provision of concurrent punishment was unconstitutional. Therefore, to remove the unconstitutional element, provisions of concurrent punishment of consumer laws were amended. But provisions of concurrent punishment of consumer laws have many problems as following. First, employee who has not a status can not be punished. However, the employee may be punished in accordance with a provision of concurrent punishment. Second, the negligence or intention of a representatives is a that of a corporation. As a result, both are the same necessarily. But in case of a provision of concurrent punishment, it is assumed that both could be different. Third, a prosecutor should prove a negligence of the corporation. Lastly, It is not appropriate to punish a intention and a negligence equally. Therefore, provisions of concurrent punishment of consumer laws should be amended to solve these problems.
      번역하기

      A provision of concurrent punishment is a provision that punishes corporations as well as employees. But the constitutional court decided that A provision of concurrent punishment was unconstitutional. Therefore, to remove the unconstitutional element...

      A provision of concurrent punishment is a provision that punishes corporations as well as employees. But the constitutional court decided that A provision of concurrent punishment was unconstitutional. Therefore, to remove the unconstitutional element, provisions of concurrent punishment of consumer laws were amended. But provisions of concurrent punishment of consumer laws have many problems as following. First, employee who has not a status can not be punished. However, the employee may be punished in accordance with a provision of concurrent punishment. Second, the negligence or intention of a representatives is a that of a corporation. As a result, both are the same necessarily. But in case of a provision of concurrent punishment, it is assumed that both could be different. Third, a prosecutor should prove a negligence of the corporation. Lastly, It is not appropriate to punish a intention and a negligence equally. Therefore, provisions of concurrent punishment of consumer laws should be amended to solve these problems.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼