近代建築物의 保存·活用을 위한 登錄文化財制度에 관한 硏究 = (A) study on registered cultural properties system for preservation and utilization of a modern building

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to find out what the problem is and how we can improve it in order to solve about current registered cultural properties system in order to preserve and utilize of modern building which faces damage and destruction. We observed how a modern building is established in terms of criteria and how designated cultural properties system is established by center of registered cultural properties among building cultural properties according to the cultural properties preservation law. Through this analysis, I studied what the problem of registered cultural properties in our country is and how it can be improved. Therefore, I strived to find out the improved method of registered cultural properties in order to activate preservation and utilization of a modern building.
So far, We have got the following conclusion.
Firstly, we could notice that our registered cultural properties adopted almost same by imitation of registered cultural properties system in Japan, and it requires to establish a policy about modern cultural properties management which is able to preserve and utilize the local autonomous entity standpoint considering domestic cultural properties management structure.
Secondly, the preservation of a modern building has been driven by designated cultural properties as adaptation for circumstances according to a social need and necessity so far, and it got to drive preservation of a modern building actively taking opportunity of adapting(2001) registered cultural properties system. Therefore, we should notify a strong ＆ weak point of registration of modern cultural properties in future. And then, it requires public advertisement for a nation.
Thirdly, the preservation of building registered registered cultural properties is limited to appearance by system, and if there is no cooperation of owner, preservation is impossible in reality since a condition change follows a report system. Therefore, it requires continuous study and example illustration for various preservation and utilization plan of registered cultural properties through analysis of advance example.
Fourthly, we could understand that the first purpose of registered cultural properties system is to preserve historical and cultural landscape of City through appearance preservation of building. So, it requires for Cultural Properties Administration or local governments to establish a historical and cultural landscape plan or a district unit plan in future or cultural properties preservation policy of surface and the line of street level.
Fifthly, the Main object of registered cultural properties system is to preserve and utilize various objects in support of voluntary cooperation of owner as we give a wide value of cultural properties, but there is no system which supports this purpose. Therefore, it requires the systemic improvement plan of spreading of awareness and activation in future.
As a result, the preservation of cultural properties and concept vary by the condition of the time such as the social, economical, and cultural level, and the cultural properties preservation system follows this as well. Registered cultural properties system takes charge of preserving a modern building required by this period, and it needs to fulfill the duty to preserve the value of cultural properties. In order to this, it requires to the in-depth study of repair and maintenance from the standpoint of preservation and utilization.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 1.2 연구의 대상 및 범위 = 2
• 1.3 연구의 내용 및 방법 = 3
• 제2장 근대건축물 보호제도의 전개 = 6
• 2.1 예비적 고찰 = 6
• 2.1.1 근대건축의 전개 및 보존과 활용의 중요성 = 6
• 2.1.2 근대건축물의 보호제도 개관 = 13
• 2.1.3 용어의 정의 = 15
• 2.2 등록문화재제도 = 18
• 2.2.1 등록문화재제도의 도입배경 및 특징 = 18
• 2.2.2 등록문화재제도의 내용 = 21
• 2.2.3 기타 관련제도의 내용 = 27
• 2.3 일본의 근대건축물 보호제도 = 29
• 2.3.1 근대건축물의 보호제도 개관 = 29
• 2.3.2 등록유형문화재제도의 내용 = 34
• 2.3.3 지방공공단체의 독자적 근대건조물 보호제도의 내용 = 42
• 2.4 소결 = 52
• 제3장 근대건축물의 보존·활용 현황 = 53
• 3.1 근대건축물의 보존 및 문화재 등록 = 53
• 3.1.1 근대건축물의 보존 = 53
• 3.1.2 근대건축물의 문화재 등록 = 57
• 3.2 근대건축물의 보존·활용 방식 및 유형 = 62
• 3.2.1. 보존방식 및 유형 = 62
• 3.2.2. 활용방식 및 유형 = 72
• 3.3 한·일간 근대건축물의 보존·활용 사례 비교 = 76
• 3.3.1. 한국의 근대건축물 보존·활용 사례 = 76
• 3.3.2. 일본의 근대건축물 보존·활용 사례 = 82
• 3.4 소결 = 86
• 제4장 등록문화재제도의 문제점 및 개선방안 = 88
• 4.1 등록문화재제도의 문제점 제기 = 88
• 4.2 등록문화재제도의 개선방안 = 91
• 4.2.1 등록문화재에 대한 문화재 보호정책의 전환 = 91
• 4.2.2 개발건축물의 보존방식 구체화 = 93
• 4.2.3. 지구단위(地區單位)의 보존방식 도입 = 96
• 4.2.4 소유자 인센티브 확대 = 98
• 4.2.5 문화재 등록기준의 완화 = 100
• 제5장 결론 = 102
• 참고문헌 = 106
• ABSTRACT = 109