기술의 본성(NOT) 개념 틀 제안 및 과학기술공학 관련 전문가들의 인식 분석 = Suggesting the Conceptual Framework of the Nature of Technology(NOT) and Examining the Conceptions of Experts of Science, Technology, and Engineering Fields regarding the NOT

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to suggest the conceptual framework for the Nature of Technology (NOT) by examining the current researches regarding the NOT in science and technology education and to analyze the conceptions of experts in science, technology, and engineering fields based on the framework of NOT.
The NOT conceptual framework developed in the study consisted of the six domains of NOT, which are 1. Technology as artifacts, 2. Technology as knowledge, 3. Technology as practice, 4. Technology as system, 5. The role of technology in society, and 6. History of technology. Also, the results of analyzing the conceptions for the 30 experts in science, technology, and engineering fields emphasize on the three domains of the 3. Technology as practice, 4. Technology as system, and 5. The role of technology in society among the 6 domains of the framework of the six domains of the NOT framework. This findings are different from the results of previous researches conducted in science and technology education for exploring the conceptions of NOT in the POV of the public and students. As such, the results show that while the public and students possess naive ideas on NOT only focusing on the technology as products and tools, experts in science, technology, and engineering fields possess the authentic views of the NOT reflecting the complex and abstract concepts of technology in terms of the perspectives of philosophy of technology.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 기술의 본성(NOT: Nature of Technology)에 대한 개념 정리를 위하여 최근 수행된 NOT 관련 문헌 연구를 통하여 포괄적인 NOT 개념 틀을 제안하고 이를 바탕으로 국내외의 과학기술공학 전문 가들의 기술 개념에 대한 인식을 탐구하고자 하였다. 과학과 기술교육 영역의 다양한 NOT 관련 선행연구를 분석하여 제시된 NOT 영역은 1. 인공물로서의 기술(Technology as artifacts), 2. 지식으로서의 기술(Technology as knowledge), 3. 실행으로서의 기술(Technology as practice), 4. 시스템으로서의 기술(Technology as system), 5. 사회적 역할의 기술(The role of technology in society), 그리고 6. 기술의 역사(History of technology) 6가지로 제안되었다. 또한 제안된 6개의 NOT 영역을 기준으로 과학기술공학 전문가들 30명의 인식 분포를 조사한 결과 전문가들은 다양한 NOT 개념 중에서 3. 실행으로서의 기술, 4. 시스템으로서의 기술, 그리고 5. 사회적 역할의 기술의 3가지 영역을 주로 인식하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이것은 NOT 선행연구 에서 대중이나 학생들이 주로 기술을 ‘인공물로서의 기술’ 또는 ‘응용 과학으로서의 기술’로 이해하고 있다는 결과와는 달리 과학기술공학 전문가들은 기술의 개념을 기술철학적 차원의 복잡하고 추상적인 ‘인 간의 총체적 지식과 행위’로 이해하고 있다는 것을 보여주었다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이영희, "우리나라 생명과학 관련 분야 재미 과학자들은 어떻게 과학의 본성을 이해하고 있는가" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 677-691, 2014

2 이현옥, "대학생들의 과학기술관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 논의에서 기술의 본성(NOT)은 어떻게 나타나는가?" 한국과학교육학회 36 (36): 303-315, 2016

3 최유경, "기술적 소양의 개념 및 구성 요소에 관한 선행연구 분석" 한국기술교육학회 7 (7): 141-153, 2007

4 문성채, "과학적 소양을 바탕으로 해석한 환경소양 요소에 의한 중학교 ‘환경과 녹색성장’ 교과서 분석" 한국환경교육학회 28 (28): 1-14, 2015

5 이현옥, "과학기술관련 사회쟁점에 대한 의사결정에서 나타나는 NOT 이해 수준의 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발 및 적용" 한국과학교육학회 37 (37): 323-334, 2017

6 이현옥, "과학·기술관련 사회쟁점(SSI)에 대한 학생들의 주요 의사결정 논점의 기술의 본성(NOT)적 해석" 한국과학교육학회 35 (35): 169-177, 2015

7 서동현, "공업계열 특성화고 학생들의 기술의 본성(NOT)에 대한 인식 탐구 - 과학기술사 수업을 중심으로 -" 한국생물교육학회 45 (45): 199-212, 2017

8 DiGironimo, N., "What is technology? investigating student conceptions about the nature of technology" 33 (33): 1337-1352, 2011

9 Lederman, N. G., "Views of nature of science quesrionnaire : Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science" 39 (39): 497-521, 2002

10 Mitcham, C., "Thinking through technology : The path between engineering and philosophy" University of Chicago Press 1994

11 Pitt, J. C., "Thinking about technology : Foundations of the philosophy of technology" Seven Bridges Press 2000

12 Zorlu, Y., "The views of pre-service classroom teachers about nature of technology" 106 : 3121-3132, 1993

13 Fedock, P., "The professional development of college science professors as science teacher educators" 80 (80): 5-19, 1996

14 Celik, S., "The effect of a"science, technology and society"course on perspective teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science" 24 (24): 255-273, 2006

15 Aikenhead, G., "The development of a new instrument : Views on science-technology-society(VOSTS)" 76 (76): 477-491, 1992

16 Choi, U. H., "The Study of Technology Education" Heoung-Sul Press 2017

17 Moore, D. R., "Technology literacy : The extension of cognition" 21 (21): 185-193, 2011

18 Waight, N., "Technology knowledge : high school science teachers’conceptions of the nature of technology" 12 (12): 1143-1168, 2014

19 ITEA(International Technology Education Association), "Technology for All Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology (rationale and structure)" ITEA 1996

20 Layton, E. T., "Technology as knowledge" 15 (15): 31-41, 1974

21 ITEA(International Technology Education Association), "Technological literacy for all : A rationale and structure for the study of technology" ITEA 2006

22 Schatzberg, E., "Technik comes to America : Changing meaning of technology before 1930" 47 : 486-512, 2006

23 Pearson, G., "Technically speaking : Why all americans need to know more about technology" National Academy Press 2002

24 National Research Council(NRC), "Technically speaking : Why all Americans needs to know more about technology" National Academy Presss 2002

25 National Research Council(NRC), "Tech tally : Approaches to assessing technological literacy" National Academy Press 2006

26 Wright, R. T., "Teaching technology:A teacher’s guide" International Technology Education Association 1993

27 Lederman, N. G., "Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science : A review of the research" 29 (29): 331-359, 1992

28 ITEA(International Technology Education Association), "Standards for technological literacy : Content for the study of technology" ITEA 2007

29 Oldenziel, R., "Signifying semantics for a history of technology" 47 : 477-485, 2006

30 National Science Teachers Association [NSTA], "Science-Technology-Society : Science Education for The 1980s(An NSTA Position Statement)" National Science Teachers Association [NSTA] 1982

31 McGinn, R. E., "Science, technology, and society" Prentice Hall 1991

32 Freenberg, A., "Questioning technology" Routledge 1999

33 Collier-Reed, B. I., "Pupils’ Experiences of Technology : Exploring Dimensions of Technological Literacy" VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e. K 2008

34 American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], "Project 2061 : Science for All Americans" Oxford University Press 1990

35 Harding, P., "Portraying science accurately in classrooms : Emphasizing open-mindness rather than relativism" 42 (42): 668-690, 2000

36 Durbin, P. T., "Philosophy of technology : In search of discourse synthesis" 10 (10): 4-319, 2006

37 Franssen, M., "Philosophy of technology (Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy)"

38 Rose, M. A., "Perceptions of technological literacy among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics leaders" 19 (19): 35-52, 2007

39 Synder, J., "One world, rival theories" 145 : 52-62, 2004

40 Waight, N., "Nature of technology : implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms" 34 (34): 2875-2905, 2012

41 National Research Council(NRC), "National science education standards" National Academy Press 1996

42 ITEA(International Technology Education Association), "Measuring progress : Assessing students for technological literacy" ITEA 2004

43 Marton, F., "Learning and Awareness" Lawrence Erlbaum 1997

44 Kim, U. S., "Information society and ethics: The nature of technology" 1998

45 Meichtry, Y. J, "Influencing student understanding of the nature of science : Data from a case of curriculum development" 29 (29): 389-407, 1992

46 Young, A. T., "Improving technological literacy : The first steps is understanding what is meant by ‘Technology’" 18 (18): 73-79, 2002

47 Duschl, R., "Improving science education: The contribution of research" Open University Press 187-206, 2000

48 Marianne, C. P., "How do elementary science textbooks present the nature of science?" 79 : 148-162, 2015

49 Bayir, E., "Exploring natural and social scientists’ views of nature of science" 36 (36): 1286-1312, 2014

50 Liou, P., "Developing an intrument for assessing students’ concepts of the nature of technology" 33 (33): 162-181, 2015

51 Smith, M. U., "Defining versus describing the nature of science : A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science education" 83 : 493-509, 1999

52 Ministry of Education(MOE), "Curriculum of High School Science Education"

53 Taylor, A. R., "Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists’ and teachers’ perceptions of science education" 92 (92): 1058-1075, 2008

54 Krippendorff, K., "Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology" Sage 2004

55 Lee, H., "Construction of nature of technology framework and its utilization for investigation of changes in college students’ perception of nature of technology through SSI-based program" Ewha Womans University 2015

56 이영희, "Comparative Analysis of the Presentation of the Nature of Science (NOS) in Korea and US Elementary Science Textbooks" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 207-212, 2014

57 Jeanpierre, B., "Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers’ classroom practices" 42 (42): 668-690, 2005

58 Millar, R., "Beyond 2000 : Science education for the future" King’s College London 1998

59 American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], "Benchmarks for Science Literacy" Oxford University Press 1993

60 Chiappetta, E. L., "Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science" 29 (29): 1847-1868, 2007

61 Aydin, F., "An investigation of pre-service science teachers’ cognitive structures and ideas about the nature of technology" 11 (11): 209-221, 2010

62 ITEA(International Technology Education Association), "Advancing excellence in technological literacy: students assessment, professional development, and program standards" ITEA 2003

63 Frank, M., "A systems approach for developing technological literacy" 17 (17): 19-34, 2005

64 Confrey, J., "A review of the research on student conceptions im mathematics, science, and programming" 16 : 3-56, 1990

65 Chiappetta, E. L., "A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks" 28 : 713-725, 1991

66 National Research Council(NRC), "A framework for K-12 science education : Practices, crosscutting concept, and core idea" National Academy Press 2012

67 Misa, T. J., "A companion to the philosophy of technology" Blackwell 7-17, 2009

68 이영희, "A Proposal of Inclusive Framework of the Nature of Science (NOS) Based on the 4 Themes of Scientific Literacy for K-12 School Science" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 553-568, 2013