RISS 검색 - 국내학술지논문 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

L/C provides the exporter and the importer with safe assurance in the
exchange of goods for payment in international trade. It involves a
number of parties. Although the parties may have confidence in their
client, bad faith or ignorance of international banking practice by any of
these parties could cause the failure of transaction, which makes
international trade a risky business. Most of the risks are found in
transport document, which can cause disputes.
There are many factors in the risk of transport documents under L/C
transaction. One most common risk factor for the beneficiary in all
transport documents is even if there is no discrepancy in document, the
issuing bank or the applicant refuses to pay or delay payment insisting
there is a discrepancy. In some very rare cases, the beneficiary may not
get paid due to unfair injunction of the local court of the applicant. For
the applicant, most common risk factors are fake bill and fraud.
Risks classified according to the sorts of transport documents are as
follows.
1. In B/L, payment can be refused because it is regarded as charter party
B/L, although there is no real charter party contract. And the applicant
can bear the potential risk of the loss or deterioration of cargo
through transhipment of the cargo loaded on board in container if
transhipment is prohibited without excluding of UCP 600 article 20 (c).
2. In charter party B/L, the applicant may take delivery without paying
when charter party B/L is signed by charterer, which can result in a
big loss for the beneficiary and the negotiating bank. And risks may
arise when cargo is seized because the charterer does not pay the hire.
The applicant and the issuing bank are also vulnerable to a risk -
Against whom should they file a suit when cargo gets damaged during
transportation?
3. In multimodal transport document, which is subject to a conflict
because there is a big difference in viewpoints between transport
industry and banks, conflicts may also arise when L/C requires ocean
B/L and accepts multimodal transport document at the same time, but
does not specify the details.
4. In air waybill, where the consignee is not the issuing bank but the
applicant, risks may take place to the beneficiary when the applicant
takes delivery but refuses to pay asserting minor discrepancies in
document. The applicant may also bear the risk when cargo may not
be loaded because air waybill is a received bill. Another risk may arise
when although the applicant prohibits transhipment without excluding
UCP 600 article 23 (c), the cargo may be transhipped, provided that
the entire carriage is covered by one and the same air waybill.

목차 (Table of Contents)

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 운송서류 공통 위험요인
Ⅲ. 운송서류 개별 위험요인
Ⅳ. 결 론
참 고 문 헌

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 운송서류 공통 위험요인
Ⅲ. 운송서류 개별 위험요인
Ⅳ. 결 론
참 고 문 헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박석재, "항공운송서류의 국제표준은행관행에 관한 연구" 한국해법학회 29 (29): 207-230, 2007

2 서백현, "제6차 개정 신용장통일규칙 항구간 운송선하증권조항의 해석" 한국관세학회 7 (7): 129-144, 2006

3 채동헌, "제6차 개정 신용장통일규칙 하에서 운송서류에 대한 심사" 국제거래법학회 17 (17): 121-157, 2008

4 양정호, "신용장거래에서의 사기관련 한미사례 검토" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 199-222, 2005

5 박세운, "신용장거래에서 항공운송장 서류심사에 관한 연구" 한국국제상학회 24 (24): 199-220, 2009

6 박세운, "신용장거래에서 용선계약부 선하증권의 심사에 관한 연구" 한국무역학회 34 (34): 273-294, 2009

7 정홍주, "무역업의 리스크관리 사례 연구 - 한국과 일본 종합상사를 중심으로 -" 한국무역학회 33 (33): 167-184, 2008

8 오원석, "국제대금결제에서의 신용위험 대처방안에 관한 연구 - 국제팩토링·포페이팅을 중심으로 -" 한국무역상무학회 39 : 143-175, 2008

9 김정회, "개정 화환신용장통일규칙(UCP 600)상 운송서류의 수리요건과 문제점에 관한 연구" 한국해운물류학회 (55) : 145-173, 2007

10 東京銀行, "貿易と信用狀" 實業之日本社 1987