RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      북한의 핵능력 고도화와 국가안보 옵션 = South Korea’s Options for Countering the Growing North Korean Nuclear Threat

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108956369

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      North Korea’s nuclear weapons, initially developed to guarantee regime survival, became a source of leverage in diplomatic negotiations, and have evolved to the point of being an existential threat to the security of the Republic of Korea(South Korea). If current trends continue, by 2030, North Korea is forecast to have as many as between 166 and 300 nuclear warheads. Further, by successfully testing a hydrogen bomb and an intercontinental ballistic missile in 2017, it has significantly weakened U.S. extended deterrence. What is more, according to polling by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs in 2023, 53% of Republican voters oppose U.S. military defense of South Korea in the event of an invasion by North Korea. Hence, if the GOP wins the Presidential election in November 2024, U.S. determination to protect South Korea is expected to weaken.
      In such circumstances, in the medium and long run, the South Korean government needs to pursue its own nuclear weapons program. However, doing so would require a politician with considerable dedication to the issue to be elected in one of the next two South Korean presidential elections. Thus, South Korea needs to amend the ROK-U.S. Agreement for Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation at the earliest stage in the near future so that South Korea can acquire full nuclear latency, and can rapidly go nuclear in a crisis, like Japan is currently able to do so. The South Korean government needs to pursue the creation of a consortium with Japan and the U.S. to facilitate the production and use of enriched uranium in its civilian nuclear power plants. Further, it also needs to work with Tokyo and Washington together on the construction and deployment of nuclear-powered submarines to counter the threat of North Korean submarine-launched tactical nuclear weapons.
      번역하기

      North Korea’s nuclear weapons, initially developed to guarantee regime survival, became a source of leverage in diplomatic negotiations, and have evolved to the point of being an existential threat to the security of the Republic of Korea(South Kore...

      North Korea’s nuclear weapons, initially developed to guarantee regime survival, became a source of leverage in diplomatic negotiations, and have evolved to the point of being an existential threat to the security of the Republic of Korea(South Korea). If current trends continue, by 2030, North Korea is forecast to have as many as between 166 and 300 nuclear warheads. Further, by successfully testing a hydrogen bomb and an intercontinental ballistic missile in 2017, it has significantly weakened U.S. extended deterrence. What is more, according to polling by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs in 2023, 53% of Republican voters oppose U.S. military defense of South Korea in the event of an invasion by North Korea. Hence, if the GOP wins the Presidential election in November 2024, U.S. determination to protect South Korea is expected to weaken.
      In such circumstances, in the medium and long run, the South Korean government needs to pursue its own nuclear weapons program. However, doing so would require a politician with considerable dedication to the issue to be elected in one of the next two South Korean presidential elections. Thus, South Korea needs to amend the ROK-U.S. Agreement for Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation at the earliest stage in the near future so that South Korea can acquire full nuclear latency, and can rapidly go nuclear in a crisis, like Japan is currently able to do so. The South Korean government needs to pursue the creation of a consortium with Japan and the U.S. to facilitate the production and use of enriched uranium in its civilian nuclear power plants. Further, it also needs to work with Tokyo and Washington together on the construction and deployment of nuclear-powered submarines to counter the threat of North Korean submarine-launched tactical nuclear weapons.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼