This study evaluates the use of ultrasound simulators for retaining and improving ultrasound skills acquired in undergraduate ultrasound training. Fourth‐year medical students (n = 19) with prior training in point‐of‐care sonography for shoc...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O119751758
2019년
-
0278-4297
1550-9613
SCI;SCIE;SCOPUS
학술저널
1249-1257 [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study evaluates the use of ultrasound simulators for retaining and improving ultrasound skills acquired in undergraduate ultrasound training. Fourth‐year medical students (n = 19) with prior training in point‐of‐care sonography for shoc...
This study evaluates the use of ultrasound simulators for retaining and improving ultrasound skills acquired in undergraduate ultrasound training.
Fourth‐year medical students (n = 19) with prior training in point‐of‐care sonography for shock assessment were recruited for this study. Students were randomly assigned to a study group (n = 10) that followed an undergraduate ultrasound training curriculum, then used a simulator to complete 2 self‐directed practice ultrasound sessions over 4 weeks. The control group (n = 9) followed the same undergraduate ultrasound training curriculum and received no additional access to a simulator or ultrasound training. A blinded assessment of the students was performed before and after the 4‐week study period to evaluate their image acquisition skills on standardized patients (practical examination). To evaluate the student's clinical understanding of pathological ultrasound images, students watched short videos of prerecorded ultrasound scans and were asked to complete a 22‐point questionnaire to identify their findings (visual examination).
All results were adjusted to pretest performance. The students in the study group performed better than those in the control group on the visual examination (80.1% versus 58.9%; P = .003) and on the practical examination (77.7% versus 57.0%; P = .105) after the 4‐week study period. The score difference on the postintervention practical examinations was significantly better for the study group compared to the control group (11.6% versus –9.9%; P = .0007).
The use of ultrasound simulators may be a useful tool to help previously trained medical students retain and improve point‐of‐care ultrasound skills and knowledge.
The Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation: A Literature Review
Measuring Intraventricular Pressure Using Ultrasound Elastography