RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      English Island Constraints by Natives and Korean Non-natives

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105946493

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper examined how English native speakers (NS) and Korean non-native speakers (NNS) processed English island sentences differently, by taking an experimental design and its statistical analysis. Sprouse et al. (2012) demonstrated that NS clearly...

      This paper examined how English native speakers (NS) and Korean non-native speakers (NNS) processed English island sentences differently, by taking an experimental design and its statistical analysis. Sprouse et al. (2012) demonstrated that NS clearly identified four types of island constraints in their language: Whether, Complex NP, Subject, and Adjunct. Kim (2015), on the other hand, applied the similar method and observed that Korean NNS did not identify Complex NP and Adjunct islands. This study performed the similar experiments in previous studies but it adopted the magnitude estimation (ME) method, rather than the Likert scale. The target sentences came from Sprouse et al. (2012), and the same set of sentences were used for both American NS and Korean NNS. A total of 100 students participated in the experiment respectively, and the acceptability scores were measured with the ME method. Then, the collected data were analyzed with a generalized linear model (GLM). Through the experiments, the followings were found: (i) Korean NNS clearly identified all of the four types of island constraints in English and (ii) DD-scores of Korean NNS were smaller than those of American NS.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정대호, "Why is HOW in Korean Insensitive to Islands?: A Revised Nominal Analysis" 현대문법학회 (39) : 115-131, 2005

      2 Hwang, H., "Wh-phrase Questions and Prosody in Korean" CSLI 2007

      3 윤정미, "Wh-island Effects of Wh-in-situ Questions in Korean: More Variations and More Problems" 한국생성문법학회 21 (21): 763-778, 2011

      4 윤정미, "Wh-island Effects in Korean Wh-in-Situ Questions: Degradedness or Misinterpretation?" 한국언어학회 37 (37): 357-382, 2012

      5 Suh, C, "Wh-constructions in Korean" Top Press 1987

      6 Sohn, H, "Theme-prominence in Korean" 2 : 2-19, 1980

      7 Odlin, T., "The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition" Blackwell 436-386, 2003

      8 White, L., "The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition" Lawrence Erlbaum 111-129, 1998

      9 Schütze, C., "The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology" University of Chicago Press 1996

      10 Han, J, "Syntactic Movement Analysis of Korean Relativization" 28 : 335-357, 1992

      1 정대호, "Why is HOW in Korean Insensitive to Islands?: A Revised Nominal Analysis" 현대문법학회 (39) : 115-131, 2005

      2 Hwang, H., "Wh-phrase Questions and Prosody in Korean" CSLI 2007

      3 윤정미, "Wh-island Effects of Wh-in-situ Questions in Korean: More Variations and More Problems" 한국생성문법학회 21 (21): 763-778, 2011

      4 윤정미, "Wh-island Effects in Korean Wh-in-Situ Questions: Degradedness or Misinterpretation?" 한국언어학회 37 (37): 357-382, 2012

      5 Suh, C, "Wh-constructions in Korean" Top Press 1987

      6 Sohn, H, "Theme-prominence in Korean" 2 : 2-19, 1980

      7 Odlin, T., "The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition" Blackwell 436-386, 2003

      8 White, L., "The Generative Study of Second Language Acquisition" Lawrence Erlbaum 111-129, 1998

      9 Schütze, C., "The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology" University of Chicago Press 1996

      10 Han, J, "Syntactic Movement Analysis of Korean Relativization" 28 : 335-357, 1992

      11 Gravetter, F., "Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences" Wadsworth 2013

      12 Kim, B., "Sensitivity to Islands in Korean-English Bilinguals" University of California at San Diego 2015

      13 Kim, I, "Rethinking ‘Island Effects’ in Korean Relativization" 38 : 59-82, 2013

      14 Rizzi, L., "Relativized Minimality" MIT Press 1990

      15 R Core Team, "R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing"

      16 Johnson, K., "Quantitative Methods in Linguistics" Blackwell 2008

      17 Stevenson, S., "Psycholinguistics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects" John Wiley 1975

      18 홍선호, "On the Lack of Syntactic Effects in Korean Wh-Questions" 대한언어학회 12 (12): 43-57, 2004

      19 Schachter, J, "On the Issue of Completeness in Second Language Acquisition" 6 (6): 93-124, 1990

      20 Lodge, M., "Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions" Sage Publications 1981

      21 Bard, E., "Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability" 72 : 32-68, 1996

      22 Sprouse, J., "Magnitude Estimation and the Non-Linearity of Acceptability Judgments" Cascadilla Proceedings Project 397-403, 2008

      23 Selinker, L, "Language Transfer" 9 (9): 67-92, 1969

      24 Odlin, T., "Language Transfer" Cambridge University Press 1989

      25 Kang, Y., "Korean Syntax and Universal Grammar" Harvard University 1986

      26 Park, B, "Island-insensitive Sluicing" 9 : 669-682, 2001

      27 박범식, "Island Sensitivity in Ellipsis and Its Implications for Movement" 한국생성문법학회 19 (19): 599-620, 2009

      28 Hawkins, R., "Interpretation of English Multiple Wh-questions by Japanese Speakers: A Missing Uninterpretable Feature Account" 22 : 269-301, 2006

      29 White, L, "How Native is Near-native? The Issue of Ultimate Attainment in Adult Second Language Acquisition" 12 (12): 233-265, 1996

      30 Keller, F., "Gradient in Grammar: Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality" University of Edinburgh 2000

      31 Cowart, W., "Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments" Sage Publications 1997

      32 박연경, "English Island Sentences by Korean EFL Learners" 한국영어학학회 24 (24): 153-172, 2018

      33 Maxwell, S., "Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2003

      34 Johnson, J., "Critical Period Effects on Universal Properties of Language: The Status of Subjacency in the Acquisition of a Second Language" 39 (39): 215-258, 1991

      35 Lee, Y., "Corpus Linguistics and Statistics Using R" Hankuk Publishing Co 2016

      36 Ross, J., "Constraints on Variables in Syntax" Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1967

      37 Agresti, A., "Categorical Data Analysis" Wiley 2007

      38 Chomsky, N., "Barriers" MIT Press 1986

      39 Lee, H., "Asymmetry in Island Constrains in Korean" University of California at Los Angeles 1982

      40 Kim, H., "Aspects of Sentence Processing Island Structures in English by Korean Learners of English" Dongkuk University 2015

      41 Agresti, A., "Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data" Wiley 2010

      42 Chomsky, N., "A festschrift for Morris Halle" Holt, Rinehart and Winston 232-286, 1973

      43 Sprouse, J, "A Test of the Relation between Working Memory Capacity and Syntactic Island Effects" 88 : 82-123, 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.37
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.36 0.38 0.694 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼