성폭력범죄의 행위유형에 대한 비판적 형법도그마틱 = Crititical Pespective on current System of Sexual Assault

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Criminal law regulates sexual assault by two representative type of crime, which are ‘rape’ and ‘sexual abuse’. Excluding violence and threatening, the type of act that is common in both kind of sexual assault, rape is considered as an adultery and the latter goes under abuse. In this case, adultery is understood as sexual intercourse between male and female. Therefore, if there were no genital interaction, then it must be subsumed as an sexual abuse and it is penalized at a substantially lower sentence. However, it is questionable whether such reaction of present criminal law appropriate to recent conditions of sexual assault. When the Phenomenon of today’s sexual assault is looked at, it can be seen that sexual assault is frequently occurred as anal intercourse and oral intercourse etc. especially on vulnerable victims such as Children and adolescents. This is a completely different scenario than past phenomenons of sexual assault.
Therefore, this essay has focused anal intercourse or oral intercourse and have examined following points in order to provide assessment of criminal law. First, the problems of attitude of present criminal law has been looked at. Secondly, issues associated with attempts to include anal intercourse or oral intercourse into criminal law has been scrutinized. Lastly, it has been studied whether it is reasonable to constitutionalize anal intercourse or oral intercourse into system of sexual assault while considering how to classify anal intercourse or oral intercourse into criminal law in order to be realistic and to effectively protect the right of sexual self-determination.
These following statements are the concluded solutions. It is necessary to assort type of sexual assault into three categories in order to pursue accuracy and legal stability by maintaining traditional definition of adultery as well as to take violent anal intercourse or oral intercourse into greater consideration than sexual abuse. Secondly, rape should be restricted to adultery caused by violence or threat, akin to present rape. Furthermore, psudo sexual intercourse is to be broken down into two categories of anal intercourse or oral intercourse and the others in order to keep Schuldprinzip bzw. Bestimmtheitgrudsatz. Thirdly, sexual abuse should allow all the other type of acts that do not go under rape or any of the two psudo sexual intercourse categories.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 강간죄와 강제추행죄의 행위유형과 성폭력범죄의 현실
• Ⅲ. 유사성교행위를 형법전에 편입하는 방안
• Ⅳ. 성폭력범죄체계와 강제적 유사성교행위의 분류
• Ⅴ. 나오는 말
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조국, "형사법의 성편향" 박영사 51-, 2004

2 형법개정연구회, "형사법개정연구(Ⅳ) : 형법각칙 개정안" 한국형사정책연구원 2009

3 김성돈, "형법각론" 성균관출판부 160-, 2009

4 정성근, "형법각론" 삼지원 172-, 2008

5 이재상, "형법각론" 박영사 11-11, 2007

6 오영근, "형법각론" 박영사 11-15, 2005

7 배종대, "형법각론" 46-52,

8 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 47-49, 2010

9 조국, "여성주의 관점에서 본 성폭력범죄" 서울대학교 법학연구소 43 (43): 177-178, 2002

10 김혜정, "시대의 변화에 따른 강간죄의 객체 및 행위태양에 관한 재구성" 한국비교형사법학회 9 (9): 187-208, 2007

11 심영희, "성폭력의 실태 및 대책에 관한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 204-, 1990

12 오영근, "성폭력범죄의 처벌 및 피해자보호 등에 관한 법률, in 형사특별법론-5대 형사특별법" 한국형사정책연구원 656-, 2009

13 이호중, "성폭력 처벌규정에 대한 비판적 성찰 및 재구성" 한국형사정책학회 17 (17): 81-114, 2005

14 임종인, "2007년 4월 18일에 대표발의한「형법 일부개정법률안」(의안반호 제1764449호)"

15 "2007년 1월 8일자 국가인원위원회 전원위원회 결정문"