Closed-loop structural control with real-time smart sensors

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Wireless smart sensors, which have become popular for monitoring applications, are an attractive option for implementing structural control systems, due to their onboard sensing, processing, and communication capabilities. However, wireless smart sensors pose inherent challenges for control, including delays from communication, acquisition hardware, and processing time. Previous research in wireless control, which focused on semi-active systems, has found that sampling rate along with time delays can significantly impact control performance. However, because semi-active systems are guaranteed stable, these issues are typically neglected in the control design. This work achieves active control with smart sensors in an experimental setting. Because active systems are not inherently stable, all the elements of the control loop must be addressed, including data acquisition hardware, processing performance, and control design at slow sampling rates. The sensing hardware is shown to have a significant impact on the control design and performance. Ultimately, the smart sensor active control system achieves comparable performance to the traditional tethered system

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Linderman, L. E., "TinyOS-based real-time wireless data acquisition framework for structural health monitoring and control" 20 (20): 1007-1020, 2013

2 Levis, P., "TinyOS : An Operating System for Sensor Networks"

3 Chu, S. Y., "Time-delay effect and compensation on direct output feedback controlled mass damper systems" 31 : 121-137, 2002

4 Chung, L. L., "Time-delay control of structures" 24 (24): 687-701, 1995

5 Housner, G. W., "Structural control: past, present, and future" 123 (123): 897-972, 1997

6 Sain, P. M., "Structural control design in the presence of time delays" 1992

7 Linderman, L. E., "Smart Wireless Control of Civil Structures" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2013

8 Hirata, H., "Sample rate effects on disturbance rejection for digital control systems" 1990

9 Linderman, L. E., "Low-latency data acquisition hardware for real-time wireless sensor applications" 15 (15): 1800-1809, 2015

10 Dyke, S. J., "Implementation of an active mass driver using acceleration feedback control" 11 : 305-323, 1996

11 Lynch, J. P., "Implementation of a closed-loop structural control system using wireless sensor networks" 15 (15): 518-539, 2008

12 Jo, H., "Hybrid wireless smart sensor network for full-scale structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge" 2011

13 Rice, J.A., "Flexible Smart Sensor Framework for Autonomous Full-scale Structural Health Monitoring" Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory 2009

14 Loh, C. H., "Experimental verification of a wireless sensing and control system for structural control using MR dampers" 36 (36): 1303-1328, 2007

15 Rice, J. A., "Enabling framework for structural health monitoring using smart sensors" 18 (18): 574-587, 2011

16 Franklin, G., "Digital Control of Dynamic Systems" Ellis-Kagle Press 1998

17 Swartz, A., "Design of a wireless sensor for scalable distributed in-network computation in a structural health monitoring system" 2005

18 Yang Wang, "Decentralized civil structural control using real-time wireless sensing and embedded computing" 국제구조공학회 3 (3): 321-340, 2007

19 Wang, Y., "Decentralized civil structural control using a real-time wireless sensing and control system" 2006

20 Jang, S., "Calibration guide for wireless smart sensors. Illinois structural health monitoring project"

21 Spencer, B. F., "Benchmark problems in structural control : part I—Active Mass Driver system" 27 (27): 1127-1139, 1998

22 Casciati, S., "An active mass damper system for structural control using real-time wireless sensors" 19 (19): 758-767, 2012

23 Soong, T. T., "Active Structural Control : Theory and Practice, Essex" Longman Scientific &Technical 1990

24 Lynch, J.P., "A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring" 38 (38): 91-128, 2006