RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Coleridge와 Byron 시의 비교연구 = The Mariner's Humility in Contrast with Manfred's Pride

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2110583

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      When Coleridge's Ancient Mariner learns how important love and benevolence truly are, he is able to resolve his guilt and end his period of anxiety and isolation.
      Punishment was imposed upon the Mariner by powers greater than he, and after he recognized the true nature and superiority of these powers he was able to understandthe error of his ways. On the other hand Manfred's guilt and isolation are self-imposed and last until his death.
      Humility, a quality that was so necessary for the Mariner's expiation, is lacking in Manfred. He is willing to recognize any power greater than himself. There is an almost dichotomous contract between Manfred, the hero who 'acts', and the Mariner, the hero who is 'acted upon'.
      Despite this contrast, and despite other obvious differences between the Mariner and Manfred, the normative statements of Romantic individualism suggested by Coleridge and Byron in these work, The Rime of Ancient Mariner and Manfred, respectively, are similar.
      The question that is bound to arise at this point: if Manfred is not Byron's normative statement of Romantic individualism and the Chamois Hunter is, why then is the play centered around Manfred rather than the Hunter? My answer to this question is simply that Byron is more interested in Manfred then he is in the normative. Whereas Coleridge made the Mariner both the main character and the normative figure in his poem. The greatness of Byron's poem lies(as it does in most of his poems) in the presentation of the hero's alienation, pain, world weariness, unnatural prowess, defiance, and stoicism. At times, Manfred is just too pretentious and affectedly tragic, but we remain sympathetic and admiring toward him even though we recognize his lack of humility.
      Manfred is partly a product of Byron's own egotism and his proclivity to maintain his image as an outrageously naughty poet who is more interested in the perverse than the normative. Byron does, however, illustrate the superiority of the Chamois Hunter over Manfred, but his main suggestion for the right kind of life comes in his portrayal of Manfred, one who refused to lead it.
      번역하기

      When Coleridge's Ancient Mariner learns how important love and benevolence truly are, he is able to resolve his guilt and end his period of anxiety and isolation. Punishment was imposed upon the Mariner by powers greater than he, and after he recogni...

      When Coleridge's Ancient Mariner learns how important love and benevolence truly are, he is able to resolve his guilt and end his period of anxiety and isolation.
      Punishment was imposed upon the Mariner by powers greater than he, and after he recognized the true nature and superiority of these powers he was able to understandthe error of his ways. On the other hand Manfred's guilt and isolation are self-imposed and last until his death.
      Humility, a quality that was so necessary for the Mariner's expiation, is lacking in Manfred. He is willing to recognize any power greater than himself. There is an almost dichotomous contract between Manfred, the hero who 'acts', and the Mariner, the hero who is 'acted upon'.
      Despite this contrast, and despite other obvious differences between the Mariner and Manfred, the normative statements of Romantic individualism suggested by Coleridge and Byron in these work, The Rime of Ancient Mariner and Manfred, respectively, are similar.
      The question that is bound to arise at this point: if Manfred is not Byron's normative statement of Romantic individualism and the Chamois Hunter is, why then is the play centered around Manfred rather than the Hunter? My answer to this question is simply that Byron is more interested in Manfred then he is in the normative. Whereas Coleridge made the Mariner both the main character and the normative figure in his poem. The greatness of Byron's poem lies(as it does in most of his poems) in the presentation of the hero's alienation, pain, world weariness, unnatural prowess, defiance, and stoicism. At times, Manfred is just too pretentious and affectedly tragic, but we remain sympathetic and admiring toward him even though we recognize his lack of humility.
      Manfred is partly a product of Byron's own egotism and his proclivity to maintain his image as an outrageously naughty poet who is more interested in the perverse than the normative. Byron does, however, illustrate the superiority of the Chamois Hunter over Manfred, but his main suggestion for the right kind of life comes in his portrayal of Manfred, one who refused to lead it.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 작품해석1
      • Ⅲ. 작품해석2
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 작품해석1
      • Ⅲ. 작품해석2
      • Ⅳ. 결론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼