RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Tracking data and the conservation of the high seas: Opportunities and challenges

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O111512878

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remains a common cause of hospitalisation. However, interpretation and comparisons of published studies in GIB have been hampered by disparate study methodology. To make recommendations about outcome measures to b...

      Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remains a common cause of hospitalisation. However, interpretation and comparisons of published studies in GIB have been hampered by disparate study methodology.
      To make recommendations about outcome measures to be used in future randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with acute bleeding from any GI source (nonvariceal UGI, variceal, small bowel, or colon) and suggest new RCTs in acute GIB for future peer‐reviewed funding.
      As part of a National Institutes of Health conference entitled “Hemostatic Outcomes in Clinical Trials”, a group of GIB experts performed targeted critical reviews of available evidence with the goal of proposing a bleeding outcome that could potentially be applied to different disciplines. In addition, the panel sought to develop a clinically meaningful primary endpoint specifically for acute GIB, potentially allowing a more contemporary regrouping of clinically relevant outcomes.
      The primary endpoint proposed was a composite outcome of further bleeding within 30 days after randomisation leading to red blood cell transfusion, urgent intervention (repeat endoscopy; interventional radiology or surgery), or death. Secondary outcomes may include the individual components of the primary outcome, length of hospitalisation, serious adverse events, and health care resource utilisation.
      The proposed endpoint may help move the GIB field forward by focusing on the most clinically relevant outcomes for patients with acute GIB of all types and informing study design and importance of sample size determination for future RCTs in GIB.
      What is a new clinically relevant primary outcome measure for new randomized controlled trials (RCT's) of acute, severe gastrointestinal haemorrhage and what new RCT's are recommended for potential funding? An NIH Workshop of international experts recommended a composite outcome measure for new RCT's of all types of acute, severe GI haemorrhage, including non‐variceal and variceal upper GI, small intestinal, and colon bleeding. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome of further bleeding within 30 days after randomization leading to red blood cell transfusion, urgent intervention (repeat endoscopy; interventional radiology or surgery) or death directly or indirectly related to further bleeding. Secondary outcomes may include the individual components or the primary endpoint, length of hospitalization, serious adverse events, and health care resource utilization. Six new RCT's were described which may help governmental agencies decide which questions to focus on for supporting large, clinically important studies of acute GI haemorrhage.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼