한국어 보문명사 구문의 의미 특성 = Semantic Features of Korean Complement Noun Constructions

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The main purpose of this study is to describe the existence or nonexistence of the factivity―‘factive’ is defined as ‘judged to be true by the speaker’―of the complement proposition in relation to the structure―complementizers, complement nouns, and (main) predicates―of Korean complement noun constructions. In the course of the study, the writer expands the discussion to introduce the semantic features of ［Realized］and ［Propositional］.
According as complements are, in most cases, factive or nonfactive, predicates are clas­sified as factive ([＋Factive]), nonfactive([－Factive]), and neutral ([ 0 Factive]); and complementizers are also classified as ｛nin｝of [＋Factive], ‘-ko’ of [－Factive], and ‘-ko hanin’ and ‘im’ of [ 0 Factive]. Complement nouns are classified according to the factivity or nonfactivity of the complements which complement nouns take and according to the possiblity of cooccurrence with ｛nin｝([＋Factive], [0 Propositional]) or ‘-ko hanin’ ([ 0 Factive], [ ＋ Propositional]). In this case the feature [Propositional] as well as [Factive] plays an important role. And complement nouns are combined with predicates irrespective of the feature [Factive], resulting in the same factivity value as that which complement nouns prescribe.
‘k∂s’ in ‘-｛nin｝k∂s’ and ‘-ko hanin k∂s’ turns out to be neither a complementizer nor a proform of other nouns (‘sasil’(fact) etc.), but a most neutral noun which has the features [ 0 Factive], [ 0 Propositional], and [ 0 Realized].