RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      의료과오소송에서 의사의 설명의무 = Explanation duty of doctor In case the malpractice suit

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101168234

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In rapidly modern society, awareness about medical practice expands unimaginably. Medical malpractice that has intrinsic, customary trait incre ases annually and a damage suit about malpractice also does. The doctor and patient should listen carefully each other in medical m alpractice. They should exchange opinions while patient has to demand e nough pre-explanation itself. In malpractice suit, explanation duty of doctor is that normally the pat ient can have to exert self-determination based on personal rights and in cluding explanation about symptom, content of therapy method, content of therapy method and danger when the doctor implements medical practic e accompanying physical invasion. Such awareness is that patient is not just object treated but, subjective existence. Therefore importance of expl anation about patient grows as meaning of self-determination of each individual. In connection with such explanation duty of doctor, the doctor does not give the patient enough explanation about possibility of bad result. If the doctor give the patient such like explanation, it is preliminary consideration of malpractice suit that the patient did not receive treatment. explanation duty of doctor is for patient’s choice as the patient compares fully necessity or danger with medical practice. the reason why we adopt non-violation theory of explanation to malpractice suit was started from proving obligation to relax theory. Explanation duty of doctor can be discussed according to malpractice’simportance, receiver’s ability about explanation duty, degree of invasion, time to performance of a duty, arraign of implied·presumptive, being able to acknowledge unpredictable danger in view of contemporary medical state, whether such explanation duty affect the doctor advantageously or adversely. But this manuscript just looks through grounds, legal temper and legal content of explanation duty, proving obligation and violation effect about explanation duty violation because of limitation of paper.
      번역하기

      In rapidly modern society, awareness about medical practice expands unimaginably. Medical malpractice that has intrinsic, customary trait incre ases annually and a damage suit about malpractice also does. The doctor and patient should listen carefully...

      In rapidly modern society, awareness about medical practice expands unimaginably. Medical malpractice that has intrinsic, customary trait incre ases annually and a damage suit about malpractice also does. The doctor and patient should listen carefully each other in medical m alpractice. They should exchange opinions while patient has to demand e nough pre-explanation itself. In malpractice suit, explanation duty of doctor is that normally the pat ient can have to exert self-determination based on personal rights and in cluding explanation about symptom, content of therapy method, content of therapy method and danger when the doctor implements medical practic e accompanying physical invasion. Such awareness is that patient is not just object treated but, subjective existence. Therefore importance of expl anation about patient grows as meaning of self-determination of each individual. In connection with such explanation duty of doctor, the doctor does not give the patient enough explanation about possibility of bad result. If the doctor give the patient such like explanation, it is preliminary consideration of malpractice suit that the patient did not receive treatment. explanation duty of doctor is for patient’s choice as the patient compares fully necessity or danger with medical practice. the reason why we adopt non-violation theory of explanation to malpractice suit was started from proving obligation to relax theory. Explanation duty of doctor can be discussed according to malpractice’simportance, receiver’s ability about explanation duty, degree of invasion, time to performance of a duty, arraign of implied·presumptive, being able to acknowledge unpredictable danger in view of contemporary medical state, whether such explanation duty affect the doctor advantageously or adversely. But this manuscript just looks through grounds, legal temper and legal content of explanation duty, proving obligation and violation effect about explanation duty violation because of limitation of paper.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 설명의무의 근거 및 법적 성질
      • Ⅲ. 설명의무의 내용
      • Ⅳ. 설명의무위반에 대한 증명책임
      • Ⅴ. 설명의무위반의 효과
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 설명의무의 근거 및 법적 성질
      • Ⅲ. 설명의무의 내용
      • Ⅳ. 설명의무위반에 대한 증명책임
      • Ⅴ. 설명의무위반의 효과
      • Ⅵ. 결 론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼