협력적 거버넌스 관점에서 주민참여예산제도 평가에 대한 주요 행위자들의 이질성 분석 - 공무원, 지방의회의원, 주민참여예산위원간의 인식 비교를 중심으로 - = Heterogeneity Analysis of Major Actors Regarding the Civil Participation Budget System Evaluation from the Viewpoint of Collaborative Governance - Focusing on the Perception Comparison of Public Officials, Local Assembly Members, and Participatory Budget

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to analyze the perception differences of Civil participatory budget behavior in the three cities of Gyeonggi Province(Paju City, Uijeongbu City, Yangju City) in relation to the implementation process of the civil participation budget system from the perspective of collaborative governance. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, there was a significant difference in each response variable according to groups. In other words, it was confirmed that the intent of each group was different for all factors of collaborative governance in the operating process except for reaction device, receptivity, and responsiveness. Second, while we did not secure many ranking results, they were scored and ranked in the order of the civil participation budget committee member> public officials> local assembly members. As a result, it is confirmed that the difference of perception of the civil participation budget system is clear, and discussion on how to reduce this perception gap should be continued.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 문제의 제기 Ⅱ. 이론 및 선행연구의 검토 Ⅲ. 연구설계 Ⅳ. 주민참여예산제도에 대한 인식 설문분석 Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 시사점