共同住宅의 再建築上 賣渡請求權에 대한 硏究 - 合憲性과 關聯 法規定의 解釋을 中心으로 : 共同住宅의 再建築上 賣渡請求權에 대한 硏究 = A Study on a Claim for Sale with Reference to Reconstruction of an Apartment House - Focused on the Constitutionality and the Interpretation of Related Law -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of a claim for sale with reference to reconstruction is to promote the public welfare. Does a claim for sale infringe on a sectional owner"s basic right who is against the reconstruction of an apartment house? In the light of ？bermaßverbot, the claim is constitutional because it does not limit too much his or her basic right such as the right to pursue happiness, the freedom of residence, the right of property and so on. And regarding a claim for sale, relating laws include Article 39 of City and residing environment maintenance law and Article 48 of Law on possession and management of a gathering building. It is desirable to interpret these laws as following: prior to exertion of a claim for sale, notice should be given. The subject of the notice is those who push forward the reconstruction, the other party of a sectional owner who was against organization of reconstruction association and his or her successor. Also the notice should be given without hesitance once the association is organized and there are no restrictions as to its number of times. It may be done in writing or conveyance by public announcement. A sectional owner who was given the notice should answer within two months whether or not to participate. Extension of the period of two months is permissible, but shortening is not. If a sectional owner who was given the notice does not answer within two months, it is interpreted that he or she means not to participate. Those who have a claim for sale are a participator of reconstruction and an appointed purchaser. Their the other parties are a sectional owner, his or her successor and a joint owner and so on. The claim should be exercised to the other party"s a sectional ownership and the use of a lot collectively. There are no restrictions as to how to exercise a claim for sale, and the exertion should be done to all the objectors within two months from the deadline of answer. Otherwise the claim extinction. On the other hand according to Clause 4, Article 48 of Law on possession and management of a gathering building, they have no rule concerning details of market price. Therefore the price is set by mutual agreement of party concerned, and when that is not possible it has to be set based on valuation of sectional ownership and the use of a lot at the time of exertion of the claim. Also under the requirement according to Clause 5 and 6, Article 48 of Law on possession and management of a gathering building, the court of justice prescribes that proper period with reference to delivery and a claim of repurchase have to be given to some few of those are against the reconstruction. A person who has a claim for sale with reference to reconstruction has to exercise the claim according to requisites and process of the law mentioned above.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 賣渡請求權의 合憲性의 根據
• Ⅲ. 賣渡請求權의 行使와 關聯된 法規定의 解釋
• Ⅳ. 맺는 말
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "현행 재건축 사업의 법적 문제점과 개선방안" 토지공법학회 10집 : 2000.8

2 "집합건물의 재건축과 매도청구권에 관한 연구" 2005.2

3 "집합건물의 소유 및 관리에 관한 법률상의 집합건물의 재건축" 인천지방법원 1997.9

4 "집합건물의 소유 및 관리에 관한 법률 제48조 제2항, 제4항 소정의 매도청구권 행사기간의 법적 성격" JURIST, 청림인터렉티브 2003.6

5 "주택업무편람" 건설교통부 2003

6 "재건축재개발사업의 법적 문제에 관한 연구" 서울지방법원 동부지원 1996

7 "재건축재개발 법률실무편람" 법률서원 1997

8 "재건축의 문제점과 개선방안" 4집 : 1998.6

9 "재건축사업의 공공성 및 개선방안" 한국공법학회 30집 (30집): 2002.5

10 "재개발재건축 이론과 실무" 법률출판사 2004

11 "재개발재건축 등기 및 법률관계" 법률정보센터 2006

12 "재개발재건축 도시 및 주거환경정비법 해설" 서초법률 2003

13 "알기 쉬운 재건축 이야기" 성안당 2000

14 "신청경매(입찰)의 실무와 재건축의 법률문제" 한국사법행정학회 1997

15 "새로운 재건축ㆍ재개발 이야기" 2004

16 "비례의 원칙과 판례의 논증방법" 헌법재판소 9집 : 1998

17 "법원실무제요 민사(상)" 법원행정처 1996

18 "도시재건축의 법적쟁점(이론과 실무)" 육법사 2002

19 "도시재개발재건축 해설" 동민출판사 2001

20 "구분건물의 재건축과 매도청구의 요건" 서울지방변호사회 12집 : 1999.1

21 "과잉금지의 원칙" 헌법재판소 1990

22 "과잉금지원칙의 내용" 한국공법학회 24집 (24집): 1996.9

23 "區分所有關係訴訟法" 東京 靑林書院 1992