대마사용의 가벌성에 관한 비판적 검토 -독일사례를 중심으로- = A Critical Review on Punishability of Cannabis Use in Germany

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, cannabis use has been increasingly legalized and decriminalized. In light of this change, this study reviewed the legitimacy of punishability of cannabis use. Specifically, this study critically analyzed the needs and the legal basis of punishability of cannabis use that are not assuming infringement of others’ legal interests, and acquisition and possession of cannabis for individual use in Germany.
National health is recognized as a legal interest of the current drug law of Germany(BtMG). In the legal interest of the national health, the criminal protection has been changed to the abstract and universal protection of legal interests that is directed to protection of functions and values of the nation and communities. This resulted in eliminating the restriction function of punishability in the criminal law and the legislators. And the paternalistic character of national health implies, and individual and social harmfulness of cannabis use that is assumed infringement of legal interest on others were criticized. Therefore, it hardly asserts that the legal interest of national health was established the legal interest of the criminal law that meets a minimum requirement for decriminalization in a punishability perspective.
Also, in order to demonstrate whether criminal punishment on cannabis use is valid for protection of legal interests, this study reviewed the cases of decriminalization on cannabis acquisition and possession. The current legally regulated cannabis markets in the Netherlands, the Colorado State and the Washington State in the United States can be adequate models to replace criminal punishment with.
Hence, Germany needs to legalize and decriminalize cannabis use. Specifically, this relates to expurgate cannabis from the Schedule 1 of the current drug law of Germany(BtMG) or abolish the regulations of the punishment on acquisition and possession of a small dose of cannabis for individual use. This indicates proactiveness for individual cannabis use is not penalized according to the criminal law. Also, the regulated delivery system for cannabis to supply legally a small dose of cannabis for individual use is needed. The results of this study suggest that there is a need to initiate social discussion on legitimacy and adequacy of legal punishment on individual cannabis use in Korea. Further, it is crucial to examine a paradigm shift of the cannabis policy toward decriminalization of individual cannabis use.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 대마사용에 대한 처벌의 정당화
• Ⅲ. 대마사용의 가벌성에 관한 검토
• Ⅳ. 나가며
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이상돈, "형법의 근대성과 대화이론" 홍문사 1994

2 이 얼, "형법상 자기결정권에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2013

3 김선복, "현행 마약류법에 대한 고찰" 2 (2): 137-160, 2000

4 원형식, "처벌조건의 일반원리 - 범죄성립조건 및 소송조건과의 구분을 중심으로 -" 한국형사법학회 20 (20): 75-94, 2008

5 전현욱, "중독(中毒)에 대한 정당한 형사정책의 기준과 한계: 불법과 그 주관적 귀속에 관한 형법이론을 중심으로" 한국형사정책연구원 24 (24): 187-211, 2013

6 김재윤, "위험사회에 있어 형법의 팽창현상에 대한 비판적 고찰" 한국비교형사법학회 7 (7): 29-52, 2005

7 문성호, "삼과 사람(하): 삼 비범죄화, 범죄화와 합법화의 변증법" 한국학술정보 2006

8 김창군, "비범죄화의 실현방안" 8 : 5-38, 1996

9 배종대, "마약범죄와 인간의 존엄" 4 : 423-465, 1996

10 이보영, "마약범죄 처벌의 정당성" 한국법학회 (47) : 217-238, 2012

11 이건호, "마약문제의 해결을 위한 각국의 전략 비교분석" 15 : 7-36, 2004

12 박용철, "마약류범죄의 처벌에 대한 소고 - 연성 마약을 중심으로 -" 한국비교형사법학회 15 (15): 63-94, 2013

13 남궁현, "마리화나 정책 변화의 고찰: 콜로라도 마리화나 합법화의 경우" 한국형사정책연구원 25 (25): 1-28, 2014

14 김주일, "독일 약물합법화론에 대한 연구" 한독사회과학회 20 (20): 61-90, 2010

15 김주일, "독일 대마합법화론에 관한 연구" 한독사회과학회 23 (23): 141-182, 2013

16 이은모, "대마의 성질과 그에 관한 현행법상의 규제" 7 : 309-332, 1995

17 박진실, "대마의 비범죄화에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 대학원 2015

18 임웅, "非犯罪化의 方案에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 19 (19): 461-480, 2007

19 Böllinger, Lorenz, "Zwischen Legalisierung und Normalisierung. Ausstiegsszenarien aus der Repressiven Drogenpolitik" Schüren 147-167, 1992

20 Hassemer, Winfried, "Theorie und Soziologie des Verbrechens. Ansätze zu einer Praxisorientierten Rechtsgutslehre" Scriptor Verlag 1973

21 Hobbing, Peter, "Strafwürdigkeit der Selbstverletzung : Der Drogenkonsum im Deutschen und Brasilianischen Recht" Peter Lang 1982

22 Maurach, Reinhart, "Strafrecht, Besonderer Teil, Teilband 2, Straftaten gegen Gemeinschaftswerte" C. F. Müller 2012

23 Müller-Dietz, Heinz, "Strafe und Staat" Vittorio Klostermann 1973

24 Trachsel, Manuel, "Selbstschädigung durch Suchtmittel aus Ethischer und Rechtlicher Sicht" 4 : 8-11, 2015

25 Bundeskriminalamt, "Rauschgiftkriminalität Bundeslagebild 2013" BKA 2013

26 Hassemer, Winfried, "Rauschgiftbekämpfung durch Rauschgift? - BGH, NJW 1991, 2359" 32 (32): 110-114, 1992

27 Hassemer, Winfried, "Kennzeichen und Krisen des Modernen Strafrechts" 25 (25): 378-383, 1992

28 Hassemer, Winfried, "Jenseits des Funktionalismus: Arthur Kaufmann zum 65. Geburtstag" Decker und Müller 85-94, 1989

29 Hohmann, Ralf, "Ist die Strafbarkeit der Selbstschädigung Verfassungswidrig? - BGH, NJW 1992, 2975" 33 (33): 370-374, 1993

30 Nestler, Cornelius, "Handbuch des Betäubungsmittelstrafrechts" Beck 697-860, 1998

31 Otto, Harro, "Gedächtnisschrift für Horst Schröder" Beck 53-71, 1978

32 Köhler, Michael, "Freiheitliches Rechtsprinzip und Betäubungsmittelstrafrecht" 104 (104): 4-64, 1992

33 Zobel, Frank, "Four Shades of Green: Modelle der Cannabisregulierung" 6 : 26-30, 2014

34 Kreuzer, Arthur, "Festschrift für Koichi Miyazawa. Dem Wegbereiter des Japanisch-deutschen Strafrechtsdiskurses" Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft 177-198, 1995

35 European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, "European Drug Report. Trends and Development" Publications Office of the European Union 2015

36 Bundesverfassungsgericht, "Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. 90. Band" J. C. B. Mohr(Paul Siebeck) 145-226, 1994

37 Krumdiek, Nicole, "Entkriminalisierung von Drogenkonsumenten – Legalisierung von Drogen" Fachhochschulverlag 49-58, 2012

38 Büttner, Thomas, "Eine Verfassungsrechtliche Bewertung des Betäubungsmittelstrafrechts : Zum Cannabis-Beschluß des Bundesverfassungsgerichts" Peter Lang 1997

39 Wang, Huang-Yu, "Drogenstraftaten und Abstrakte Gefährdungsdelikte" Tenea Verlag für Medien 2003

40 Schmidt-Semisch, Henning, "Drogenpraxis, Drogenrecht, Drogenpolitik. Handbuch für Drogenbenutzer, Eltern, Drogenberater, Ärzte und Juristen" Fachhochschulverlag 439-450, 2002

41 Schneider, Wolfgang, "Drogenhilfe und Drogenpolitik - Kritische Gegenwartsdiagnosen -" Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung 75-98, 2009

42 Haberl, Gunther, "Die Strafbarkeit des Umgangs mit “Nicht Geringen Mengen”im Betäubungsmittelgesetz" Pro Universitate Verlag 1998

43 Kim, Il-Su, "Die Bedeutung der Menschenwürde im Strafrecht: Insbes. für Rechtfertigung und Begrenzung der Staatlichen Strafe" 1983

44 European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, "Data and Statistics. Prevalence of Drug Use. Cannabis. Last Year Prevalence(%)"

45 Albrecht, Peter-Alexis, "Das Strafrecht im Zugriff Populistischer Politik" 14 (14): 265-273, 1994

46 Hudak, John, "Colorado’s Rollout of Legal Marijuana Is Succeeding" Center for Effective Public Management at Brookings 2014

47 Kleiber, Dieter, "Cannabiskonsum. Entwicklungstendenzen, Konsummuster und Risiken" Juventa Verlag 1998

48 Böllinger, Lorenz, "Cannabis. Neue Beiträge zu einer Alten Diskussion" Lambertus-Verlag 139-157, 2004

49 Kleiber, Dieter, "Cannabis. Neue Beiträge zu einer Alten Diskussion" Lambertus-Verlag 20-54, 2004

50 De Vos, Toon, "Cannabis. Neue Beiträge zu einer Alten Diskussion" Lambertus-Verlag 164-171, 2004

51 Reuband, Karl-Heinz, "Cannabis. Neue Beiträge zu einer Alten Diskussion" Lambertus-Verlag 213-245, 2004

52 Raschke, Peter, "Cannabis in Apotheken. Kontrollierte Abgabe als Heroinprävention" Lambertus-Verlag 1997

53 Zimmer, Lynn, "Cannabis Mythen– Cannabis Fakten" Nachtschatten Verlag 2004

54 Körner, Harald Hans, "Betäubungsmittelgesetz, Arzneimittelgesetz, Grundstoffüberwachungsgesetz" C. H. Beck 2016

55 Kleiber, Dieter, "Auswirkungen des Cannabiskonsums. Eine Expertise zu Pharmakologischen und Psychosozialen Konsequenzen" Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH 1998

56 Nestler-Tremel, Cornelius, "Anmerkung zu BGH, Beschluss v. 25. 9. 1990 – 4 StR 359/90 (LG Saarbrücken)" 12 (12): 272-278, 1992

57 대검찰청, "2015 범죄분석" 남일문화주식회사 2015

58 대검찰청, "2014 마약류범죄백서" 남일문화주식회사 2015

59 헌법재판소, "2010. 11. 25. 선고 2009헌바246 결정"

60 헌법재판소, "2005. 11. 24. 선고 2005헌바46 결정"

61 헌법재판소, "2004. 2. 26. 선고 2001헌바75 결정"