自動車事故損害賠償에 있어서의 過失相計의 法理 = A theory on the Comparative Negligence in the Compensation for the Automobile Accident Damages

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is the comparative negligence in the tort law that thee amount of the claim for the compensation may be reduced to the extent to which the plaintif has been contributorily negligent in the course of the accident. It is undoubtedly the aspect calling for the most carefull examination in the theory on the comparative negligence what is the plaintif's negligence.
In order to cover the full appreciation of the plaintif's negligence, this study deals with mainly the problems about the legal character of the comparative negligence system and the plaintif's ca-pacity for the liability. Many of the theorists say that the plaintif's negligence is the negligence in the common sense and a certain degree of the plaintif's liability capacity is necessary to be set up the comparative negligence by defendant.
But the author of this study argues that the comparative negligence system is to determine the causality in the tort law and the plaintif's negligence is different from the negligence in the com-mon sense. Namely, the system of the comparative negligence does not demand the plaintif's liabi-lity capacity of any degree because the system of the comparative negligence is to make the defen-dant come out from the liability for the damage made by plaintif's action, he says, Therefore, he says also, if the defendant proved that the plaintif was contributorily negligent to a certain extent, the defendant has not to take responsibility at that extent.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序言
• Ⅱ. 過失相計制度의 沿革
• Ⅲ. 過失相計制度의 法的性質
• １. 法的義務違反說
• ２. 間接義務違反說
• ３. 分割的因果關係說
• ４. 違法性減縮說
• ５. 金錢的評價說
• ６. 私見
• Ⅳ. 被害者의 相計能力
• １. 責任能力必要說
• ２. 事理辯識能力必要說
• ３. 能力不要說
• ４. 私見
• Ⅴ. 被害者의 範圍
• １. 被害者의 槪念의 擴大
• ２. 被害者側의 範圍의 確定
• ３. 被害者側의 類型
• Ⅵ. 過失相計制度의 適用範圍
• １. 故意의 不法行爲
• ２. 共同不法行爲
• ３. 過失相計制度의 類推適用
• Ⅶ. 關聯問題
• １. 過失相計의 方法
• ２. 一部請求와 過失相計
• ３. 交又責任과 過失相計
• ４. 無過失責任과 過失相計
• Ⅷ. 結語