RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Partial nephrectomy is not associated with an overall survival advantage over radical nephrectomy in elderly patients with stage Ib‐II renal masses: An analysis of the national cancer data base

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=O118895324

      • 저자
      • 발행기관
      • 학술지명
      • 권호사항
      • 발행연도

        2018년

      • 작성언어

        -

      • Print ISSN

        0008-543X

      • Online ISSN

        1097-0142

      • 등재정보

        SCOPUS;SCIE

      • 자료형태

        학술저널

      • 수록면

        3839-3848   [※수록면이 p5 이하이면, Review, Columns, Editor's Note, Abstract 등일 경우가 있습니다.]

      • 소장기관
      • 구독기관
        • 전북대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 성균관대학교 중앙학술정보관  
        • 부산대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 제주대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 중앙대학교 서울캠퍼스 중앙도서관  
        • 인천대학교 학산도서관  
        • 숙명여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 서강대학교 로욜라중앙도서관  
        • 계명대학교 동산도서관  
        • 충남대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 한양대학교 백남학술정보관  
        • 이화여자대학교 중앙도서관  
        • 고려대학교 도서관  
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended for localized T1a (≤4 cm) renal masses and is preferred over radical nephrectomy (RN) for amenable T1b/T2 (>4 cm) tumors. The objective of the current study was to assess overall survival (OS) differences between PN and RN in patients with T1 and T2 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
      The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with T1 and T2 RCC who underwent PN or RN from 2004 to 2014. Trends in surgery were evaluated using Cochran‐Armitage tests. Differences in OS were assessed using adjusted Kaplan‐Meier methods. The effects of procedure on OS were analyzed using propensity score‐based, weighted Cox proportional hazards models.
      In total, 212,016 patients with T1 and T2 RCC who underwent either RN (59.7%) or PN (40.3%) were included. The use of PN rose from 2004 to 2014 (T1a: from 40.6% to 71.4%; T1b/T2: from 8.4% to 26.5%; P < .01). Adjusted 5‐year OS was longer for patients who underwent PN in both subsets, although effect magnitude was reduced in the T1b/T2 cohort (T1a: 89.6% vs 85.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70‐0.75; P < .01; T1b/T2: 82.5% vs 80.8%; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83‐0.94; P = .01). The benefit of PN on OS diminished as age and time from diagnosis increased; no OS improvement was observed in patients age ≥75 years who had T1b/T2 tumors (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76‐1.06).
      Receipt of PN is associated with improved OS in patients with T1a RCC. No procedure‐related differences in OS were observed for patients age ≥75 years who had tumors measuring >4 cm. Decisions to undergo PN for T1b/T2 tumors should be based on individualized risk assessment.
      In patients with stage I and II renal cell carcinoma who undergo surgery, differences in overall survival between partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy depend on tumor size and patient age. Decisions to perform partial nephrectomy for T1b/T2 tumors should be based on individualized risk assessment.
      See also pages 3798‐3801.
      번역하기

      Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended for localized T1a (≤4 cm) renal masses and is preferred over radical nephrectomy (RN) for amenable T1b/T2 (>4 cm) tumors. The objective of the current study was to assess overall survival (OS) differenc...

      Partial nephrectomy (PN) is recommended for localized T1a (≤4 cm) renal masses and is preferred over radical nephrectomy (RN) for amenable T1b/T2 (>4 cm) tumors. The objective of the current study was to assess overall survival (OS) differences between PN and RN in patients with T1 and T2 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
      The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with T1 and T2 RCC who underwent PN or RN from 2004 to 2014. Trends in surgery were evaluated using Cochran‐Armitage tests. Differences in OS were assessed using adjusted Kaplan‐Meier methods. The effects of procedure on OS were analyzed using propensity score‐based, weighted Cox proportional hazards models.
      In total, 212,016 patients with T1 and T2 RCC who underwent either RN (59.7%) or PN (40.3%) were included. The use of PN rose from 2004 to 2014 (T1a: from 40.6% to 71.4%; T1b/T2: from 8.4% to 26.5%; P < .01). Adjusted 5‐year OS was longer for patients who underwent PN in both subsets, although effect magnitude was reduced in the T1b/T2 cohort (T1a: 89.6% vs 85.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70‐0.75; P < .01; T1b/T2: 82.5% vs 80.8%; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83‐0.94; P = .01). The benefit of PN on OS diminished as age and time from diagnosis increased; no OS improvement was observed in patients age ≥75 years who had T1b/T2 tumors (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76‐1.06).
      Receipt of PN is associated with improved OS in patients with T1a RCC. No procedure‐related differences in OS were observed for patients age ≥75 years who had tumors measuring >4 cm. Decisions to undergo PN for T1b/T2 tumors should be based on individualized risk assessment.
      In patients with stage I and II renal cell carcinoma who undergo surgery, differences in overall survival between partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy depend on tumor size and patient age. Decisions to perform partial nephrectomy for T1b/T2 tumors should be based on individualized risk assessment.
      See also pages 3798‐3801.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼