[第2編 國濟貿易保險 및 기타] 韓·中間 세이프가드 關聯紛爭의 展開에 따른 우리나라의 對應 = A Study of the Dispute Between Korea and China on the Safeguard Measure

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

After more than 15 years of negotiations, China was finally able to achieve the WTO membership, opening up new trade opportunities for China as well as existing WTO members.
China accepted a special safeguard mechanism as one of its WTO- plus commitments. And in response, Korea has since introduced China special safeguard rules, which in simple terms, allows an invocation of safeguard measures against Chinese product imports under more lapse conditions than would normally be allowed under the existing general safeguard rules.
China also introduced new safeguard rules in November 2001 in an effort to increase transparency in its operation of safeguard measures. However, the current article contends that the new rules pose a serious threat to free trade in the form of the retaliation provision, which enables China to take unilateral retaliatory actions against safeguard measures on Chinese product imports, It indicates that the provision could be operated in an arbitrary manner as the US Super 301, and lead to infringements of WTO disciplines.
This paper indicates that the foregoing elements could lead to mort trade disputes between Korea China regarding safeguard measures and subsequent retaliations on the hills of the so called the Garlic War.
The current article goes on to offer policy recommendations toward deterring such disputes.
First, it recommends a more active invocation of Korea's own retaliatory provision against China's unilateral actions at least to gain negotiating leverage.
Second, it sites problems involving China's still conspicuous state-trading practices, and proposes to raise issues again China to induce more faithful implementation of WTO disciplines
Final, it stresses the importance of preventing disputes before they arise, and suggests several specific preventive measures.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1.서론
• 2.우리나라의 대중국 세이프가드조치의 특징
• 3.중국 세이프가드조치의 특징
• 4.한·중 세이프가드 관련 분쟁의 전개방향 분석
• 5.결론 : 우리의 대응
• 참고문헌
• ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한중통상마찰의 법적 문제" 법무부 2000

2 "한중마늘분쟁의 평가와 교훈" 대외경제정책연구원 2000

3 "한중 마늘분쟁해결의 법과 정책" 법무부 (34) : 101-102, 2000

4 "한ㆍ중 마늘분쟁에 관한 의미와 평가" 2 (2): 2001

5 "한ㆍ미간 자동차분쟁의 경위와 전망" 대외경제정책연구원 24-36, 1997

6 "중국의 세이프가드 보복관세에 대한 한국과 일본의 대응비교" 대외경제정책연구원 83-, 2001

7 "중국 WTO 가입에 따른 통상법제 개편과 우리나라의 대중 통상정책수립에 관한 연구" 법무부 (45) : 49-53, 2002

8 "미통상법 301조 관련 통상협상의 대응방향에 관한 연구" 한국협상학회 1998

9 "西方國家反傾銷法實務" 中國對外經濟貿易出版社 309-, 1996

10 "The Thoery of Contestable Markets in Intenational Trade" 30 (30): 161-190, 1996

11 "Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China" 40-42, 2001

12 "American Trade Laws after the Uruguay Round" M. E. Sharpe, Inc 54-55, 1996

13 "1995 미국-일본 자동차분쟁 사례연구" 법무부 (12) : 168-, 1996