RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      責任總理制 實現을 위한 改憲 및 選拳法 改正 = A Study on The Korean Governmental System

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40101748

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The president-elect Noh declared that he would share the executive power with the prime minster to keep the government from the risk of dictatorship. In addition, regarding the electoral system, he would intend to operate the major or medium constitue...

      The president-elect Noh declared that he would share the executive power with the prime minster to keep the government from the risk of dictatorship. In addition, regarding the electoral system, he would intend to operate the major or medium constituency system in order to eradicate regional parties. The subject of the study is focused on both the efficiency of the division of the president's executive power and the parliamentary electoral system.
      The following is the result of the study.
      1. The form of Korean government is a presidential system. The vital prerequisite for a presidential system is 'one person executive'. Namely, the presidential system does not allow any kind of dual authorities between the president and his cabinet. The governmental system that the president-elect Noh premeditated is a dual authority system, which means a semi-presidential government and hence is not able to be acceptable to the current constitutional organization. Therefore, if he insists on the share of executive power with a prime minister, he should revise the constitution firstly.
      2. The Electoral systems are divided into Majority Representation System and Proportional Representation System. It is hard to say that major or medium constituency system is necessarily preferable to prevent a party from regionalism in the Majority Representation System. I would rather suggest that it is more effective to supplement or partially revise the Proportional Representation System while maintaining the minor constituency system to overcome the problem of regional parties.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序
      • Ⅱ. 責任總理制에 관한 諸問題
      • 1. 序
      • 2. 우리나라의 政府形態
      • 3. 責任總理制의 導入可能性
      • Ⅰ. 序
      • Ⅱ. 責任總理制에 관한 諸問題
      • 1. 序
      • 2. 우리나라의 政府形態
      • 3. 責任總理制의 導入可能性
      • 4. 小結
      • Ⅲ. 選擧制度의 改革
      • 1. 選擧制度의 改善方向
      • 2. 中·大選擧區制의 導入 可能性
      • 3. 比例代表制의 改善方向
      • 4. 小結
      • Ⅳ. 結論
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼