수산생물병원체의 등급 마련에 관한 고찰 = Consideration for Classification of Pathogens in Aquatic Animals

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Even though most of aquatic animal pathogens are considered opportunistic and many pose a low direct risk to personnel, all personnel working with aquatic pathogens and facilities using these organisms must comply with the regulation to prevent the release of the pathogen into the environment and causing disease in aquatic animals. First of all, in order to establish a biosafety system for aquatic pathogen, the list of microorganisms that can infect aquatic animals and humans should be drawn up according to the microorganisms encountered within national boundaries.
Second, risk assessment guideline for diseases of livestock and aquatic environment is desperately needed. Third, microorganisms should be classified into risk group based on their potential impact on human and aquatic environment.
Fourth, facilities handling aquatic pathogens should ensure that these pathogens are securely contained and safely handled for experimental or commercial development purposes. In conclusion, classification is based on the pathogenicity, mode of transmission and host range of the aquatic microorganisms, availability of effective preventative measures and treatments. Furthermore, risk group of aquatic pathogens should be correlated with physical containment facility requirements according to domestic characteristics.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이진용, "우리나라 미생물 실험실의 생물안전현황" 대한예방의학회 38 (38): 449-456, 2005

2 윤영선, "생물작용제 위해도군 분류 및 생물안전등급의 적용" 한국생물공학회 34 (34): 352-358, 2019

3 WFCC (World Federation for Culture Collections), "WFCC guidelines for the establishment and operation of collections of microorganisms"

4 Belgian Biosafety Server, "Tool-Belgian classification for micro-organisms based on their biological risks. Revised lists of pathogens and their corresponding class of biological risk"

5 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Survey on the status of domestic bio-industry in 2018" Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy 35-43, 2019

6 ePATHogen, "Risk group database"

7 ABSA(American Biological Safety Association), "Risk group classifications for infectious agents"

8 Yoon Y, "Risk group and biosafety level of biological agents" Sun Moon University 2019

9 KIOST(Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology), "Report of the marine microbial culture collection in South Korea" KIOST 13-, 2017

10 NIAS(National Institute of Agricultural Sciences), "Preservation, characterization, database and collective management for agricultural microbial resources" NIAS 7-, 2017

11 NBPRC (National Biotech Policy Research Center), "Predictions for the global life sciences industry"

12 Heo MS, "Optimization of fermentation processes for microbial resources"

13 Jenny Makkonen, "Mitochondrial genomes and comparative genomics of Aphanomyces astaci and Aphanomyces invadans" Springer Science and Business Media LLC 6 (6): 36089-, 2016

14 WHO (World Health Organization), "Laboratory biosafety manual. Third edition (revised)"

15 KDCPA(Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency), "Korea centers for disease control and prevention"

16 KDCPA(Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency), "Korea biosafety standard and guideline. Second edition"

17 KDCPA(Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency), "Korea biosafety standard and guideline. First edition"

18 Song SJ, "Essential to"Act on the promotion of collection, management, and exploitation of pathogen resources"" 8 : 1068-1071, 2015

19 Marine Bio-Resource Information System, "Designated marine bio-resource"

20 WDCM (World Data Centre for Microorganisms), "Culture collections information worldwide"

21 Canadian Biosafety Guideline, "Conducting a biosecurity risk assessment"

22 University of Tasmania, "Aquatic risk groups"