RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조선후기 '문중화' 경향과 친족조직의 변질 = The Development of the 'Munjung' System and the Changes occurred in the Kinship, the latter half of the Chosun dynasty period system

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40017632

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The so-called 'Munjung' system, which has been one of the traditional forms of the Korean family system for quite some time, is actually not a very popular one in the eyes of the people today. The 'Munjung' system had gone through some changes since the early days of the Chosun dynasty(when it was still showing equal attachments to one's paternal and maternal relatives), and became a very patrilineal and also patricentric one during the latter half of the Chosun dynasty period. The competitive rivalry among the 'Munjung' forced by the economical changes that the society was facing, also accelerated the process.
      But if we examine the formation of such Kinship, the changes they went through, and also the inner mechanisms of those Kinship, we can see that inside those mechanisms there are many conflicting facets colliding with each other. Facets such as the habit of discriminating someone versus pursuing wide-range of solidarity, the practice of excluding someone vs. bonding with someone, a feature as a community vs. the factor called blood relationship, and the quality of tradition and conservativeness, are all evident aspects that can be easily spotted to be in conflicting situations stemming from the inner workings of a family or a Kinship. These colliding facets suggest that the family system of Korea, and its blood relationship-based qualities have served the Korean people over the years in both positive and negative terms.
      Of course there are many negative aspects that can be easily pointed out of the changes which the Kinship had gone through during the latter half of the Chosun dynasty period. Yet that does not justify any shallow judgements of the system itself based or contemporary point of views. Those judgements often tries to unfairly link ① the extremely negative aspects of the 19th century Houses, or ② the much more distorted states of those negativities which became apparent during the Japanese Occupation period and the chaotic period that followed the Liberation, and ③ the selfishness and self-serving attitudes of today's so-called Munjung, to the Munjung of the latter half of Chosun dynasty's period, without any proper bases.
      The Munjung of that period were products of the members' efforts to preserve and defend themselves against other rival entities of the local regions. It was all about who was going to gain a superior authority in ruling such local matters, or how to maintain that authority. So there were indeed aspects that had nothing to do with blood-related factors. We can say that the changes of the Munjung System's nature were the results of the Munjung's self-defensive efforts, which at the same time assumed the form of a kinship-based respones.
      번역하기

      The so-called 'Munjung' system, which has been one of the traditional forms of the Korean family system for quite some time, is actually not a very popular one in the eyes of the people today. The 'Munjung' system had gone through some changes since t...

      The so-called 'Munjung' system, which has been one of the traditional forms of the Korean family system for quite some time, is actually not a very popular one in the eyes of the people today. The 'Munjung' system had gone through some changes since the early days of the Chosun dynasty(when it was still showing equal attachments to one's paternal and maternal relatives), and became a very patrilineal and also patricentric one during the latter half of the Chosun dynasty period. The competitive rivalry among the 'Munjung' forced by the economical changes that the society was facing, also accelerated the process.
      But if we examine the formation of such Kinship, the changes they went through, and also the inner mechanisms of those Kinship, we can see that inside those mechanisms there are many conflicting facets colliding with each other. Facets such as the habit of discriminating someone versus pursuing wide-range of solidarity, the practice of excluding someone vs. bonding with someone, a feature as a community vs. the factor called blood relationship, and the quality of tradition and conservativeness, are all evident aspects that can be easily spotted to be in conflicting situations stemming from the inner workings of a family or a Kinship. These colliding facets suggest that the family system of Korea, and its blood relationship-based qualities have served the Korean people over the years in both positive and negative terms.
      Of course there are many negative aspects that can be easily pointed out of the changes which the Kinship had gone through during the latter half of the Chosun dynasty period. Yet that does not justify any shallow judgements of the system itself based or contemporary point of views. Those judgements often tries to unfairly link ① the extremely negative aspects of the 19th century Houses, or ② the much more distorted states of those negativities which became apparent during the Japanese Occupation period and the chaotic period that followed the Liberation, and ③ the selfishness and self-serving attitudes of today's so-called Munjung, to the Munjung of the latter half of Chosun dynasty's period, without any proper bases.
      The Munjung of that period were products of the members' efforts to preserve and defend themselves against other rival entities of the local regions. It was all about who was going to gain a superior authority in ruling such local matters, or how to maintain that authority. So there were indeed aspects that had nothing to do with blood-related factors. We can say that the changes of the Munjung System's nature were the results of the Munjung's self-defensive efforts, which at the same time assumed the form of a kinship-based respones.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 머리말
      • 1. 조선후기 '문중화' 경향의 배경
      • 2. 조선후기 '문중'의 조직 범위
      • 3. 변질된 친족조직 '문중'의 활동 양상
      • 1) 동족마을의 형성과 발달
      • 머리말
      • 1. 조선후기 '문중화' 경향의 배경
      • 2. 조선후기 '문중'의 조직 범위
      • 3. 변질된 친족조직 '문중'의 활동 양상
      • 1) 동족마을의 형성과 발달
      • 2) 서원의 문중화 경향
      • 3) 문중활동의 여러 유형들
      • 맺음말 - '문중화' 경향의 재평가 문제
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼