RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국 의학사의 중세 기점 = The Starting Point of Medieval Medicine in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107290787

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper, I intended to identify the starting point of Korea’s medieval medicine. I thought that Korea’s medieval medicine started after the Unification of the three kingdoms by Silla, and its adoption Tang’s medical system through the establishment of a medical institute followed by the perpetuation of Chinese medicine in 692 C.E. The establishment of the National Medical Institute (Ui-hak) and the use of Chinese medical texts contributed to the increased universality and compatibility of Korean medicine with Chinese medicine in East Asia. The medical doctors who trained in the National Medical Institute studied with Tang’s medical texts, and pioneered medical advancements of Silla. This tradition of nationally tied medical institutions continued into the Goryeo and the Joseon Dynasties.
      Buddhism held great interest towards the field of medicine, enough for people to compare Buddhism itself as a medical practice of healing the hearts of human beings. Since the Buddhist temples were characterized by communal living, these temples had an early interest in hygiene and often called for a clean environment. Buddhist monks would have played the role of an intellectual as well as a physician within their community.
      The distinct feature of medicine in East Asia during the 8~9th centuries is the acceptance of the Chinese medical knowledge and it’s system by Korea and Japan and, the standardization of medicine that followed. This increased the compatibility and universality of medicine amongst the three countries and revitalized the exchange of medical knowledge in the East Asia, and led the foundation for the expansion of medicinal trade throughout East Asia. Unlike the West, central powers attempted to take exclusive control over medicine in East Asia and medical treatments were performed through the will of the king. In other words, the government exclusively operated the medical educational institutions, appointed the trained personnel as government officials through examinations, and compiled medical texts that standardized medical knowledge.
      All of this was accomplished under the medieval bureaucratic system and the medicine was used as a political tool by the kings. The official doctors were given higher status in Silla and Japan in comparison to China. This was because Chinese medicine was new knowledge in the two countries and the medical doctors that practiced the Chinese medicine were new technicians as well.
      번역하기

      In this paper, I intended to identify the starting point of Korea’s medieval medicine. I thought that Korea’s medieval medicine started after the Unification of the three kingdoms by Silla, and its adoption Tang’s medical system through the esta...

      In this paper, I intended to identify the starting point of Korea’s medieval medicine. I thought that Korea’s medieval medicine started after the Unification of the three kingdoms by Silla, and its adoption Tang’s medical system through the establishment of a medical institute followed by the perpetuation of Chinese medicine in 692 C.E. The establishment of the National Medical Institute (Ui-hak) and the use of Chinese medical texts contributed to the increased universality and compatibility of Korean medicine with Chinese medicine in East Asia. The medical doctors who trained in the National Medical Institute studied with Tang’s medical texts, and pioneered medical advancements of Silla. This tradition of nationally tied medical institutions continued into the Goryeo and the Joseon Dynasties.
      Buddhism held great interest towards the field of medicine, enough for people to compare Buddhism itself as a medical practice of healing the hearts of human beings. Since the Buddhist temples were characterized by communal living, these temples had an early interest in hygiene and often called for a clean environment. Buddhist monks would have played the role of an intellectual as well as a physician within their community.
      The distinct feature of medicine in East Asia during the 8~9th centuries is the acceptance of the Chinese medical knowledge and it’s system by Korea and Japan and, the standardization of medicine that followed. This increased the compatibility and universality of medicine amongst the three countries and revitalized the exchange of medical knowledge in the East Asia, and led the foundation for the expansion of medicinal trade throughout East Asia. Unlike the West, central powers attempted to take exclusive control over medicine in East Asia and medical treatments were performed through the will of the king. In other words, the government exclusively operated the medical educational institutions, appointed the trained personnel as government officials through examinations, and compiled medical texts that standardized medical knowledge.
      All of this was accomplished under the medieval bureaucratic system and the medicine was used as a political tool by the kings. The official doctors were given higher status in Silla and Japan in comparison to China. This was because Chinese medicine was new knowledge in the two countries and the medical doctors that practiced the Chinese medicine were new technicians as well.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.18 1.18 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.96 0.97 2.484 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼