출신학교에 따른 청각장애대학생의 쓰기에 나타난 조사 오류에 관한 연구 = A Study of postposition misuse by university students with hearing impairments

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study explores the postpositions in sentences that thirty two hearing impaired collage students made out. The sentences are analyzed with T-test using SPSS 12 to find out the difference between regular school graduates and special school graduates. The result of this study is summarized as follows. First, there is a ranking difference between the regular school graduates and special school graduates in their postposition misuse such as replacement, omission, and addition. However, there is no significant difference between the incidence in postposition misuse of regular school graduates and that of special school graduates. In the case of special school graduates, their postposition misuse was similar to the special elementary, middle and high school students’. In the case of regular school graduates, the result was different from the special school graduates’. Second, there is a ranking difference between the regular school graduates and special school graduates in their subjective postposition, objective postposition and adverb postposition misuse. However, there is no significant difference between the incidence in those morphemes misuse of regular school graduates and that of special school graduates. Besides, in the case of replacement in morphemes misuse, there is a ranking difference between the regular school graduates and special school graduates. On the other side, there is no significant difference between the incidence in replacing each morpheme misuse of regular school graduates and that of special school graduates. In the case of special school graduates, their morphemes misuse was similar to the special elementary, middle and high school students’. However, in the case of regular school graduates, the result was different from the special school graduates’. In conclusion, there is a typical pattern in postposition and morphemes misuse of hearing impaired college students using sign language. Compared with a speech education environment, the sign language shows no significant difference in students’postposition and morphemes use ability. It means that the sign language doesn’t interfere with their language acquisition.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이관규, "학교문법론" 도서출판 월인 2002

2 남기심, "표준국어문법론" 탑출판사 2007

3 석동일, "청각장애학생의 조사 사용능력" 10 (10): 25-35, 1992

4 이춘섭, "청각장애아의 조사오용에 관한 연구" 3 : 5-39, 1978

5 김주영, "청각장애아동과 건청아동의 보통명사에 대한 의미론적 발달 비교" 대구대학교 대학원 2002

6 시옥순, "청각장애 학생의 문장 오류 분석" 경남대학교 대학원 2001

7 강창욱, "청각장애 학생 언어의 통사구조 분석" 대구대학교 대학원 1994

8 한효섭, "청각장애 아동과 언어발달지체 아동의 문법형태소 비교연구" 단국대학교 대학원 2003

9 강창욱, "청각장애 성인 언어의 문장 구성론적 특징" 25 (25): 151-189, 2002

10 하현주, "중학생들의 문장오류실태분석과 독서량과의 상관관계" 대전대학교 교육대학원 2003

11 손일수, "일기에 나타난 청각장애 학생의 문장 분석" 12 (12): 49-65, 1989

12 김용세, "인공와우이식 청소년과 건청청소년의 쓰기에서의 조사사용비교" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2009

13 류은정, "인공와우 이식 아동의 조사사용특성" 한림대학교 대학원 2005

14 변선영, "이야기 쓰기에 나타난 건청아동과 청각장애 아동의 결속표지 비교" 단국대학교 대학원 2003

15 송혜경, "수화-구화 이중언어 사용 청각장애 아동과 구화 사용 청각장애 아동의 격조사 사용 비교" 대구대학교 재활과학대학원 2006

16 박덕유, "문장론의 이해" 한국문화사 2002

17 이길용, "멀티미디어 언어 학습 프로그램이 청각장애 학생의 읽기ㆍ쓰기능력에 미치는 효과" 대구대학교 대학원 2002

18 김미숙, "다운증후군 아동과 일반아동의 문법형태소 산출" 단국대학교 대학원 2004

19 유재이, "농학생의 조사사용 및 어미활용 능력" 전주우석대학교 교육대학원 1990

20 강창욱, "농학생 문장의 문법적 특징 연구" 대구대학교 대학원 1987

21 원성옥, "농아동의 수화언어습득과 언어교육" 41 (41): 77-100, 2002

22 우장석, "그림이야기 언어검사(PSLT)에 의한 농학생의 문장능력" 대구대학교 대학원 1984

23 이경희, "교사와의 상호작용을 통한 통합적 지도가 청각장애 아동의 쓰기 발달에 미치는 효과" 대구대학교 대학원 2002

24 Pien, D., "The development of language functions in deaf infantsj of hearing parents in:Cognition, Education, and Deafness, vol, 2." Gallaudet University Press 30-33, 1985

25 Wilbur, R. B., "Syntactic Structure in the Written Language of Deaf Children" 77 (77): 194-203, 1975

26 Marschark, M., "Success and failure in learning to read: The special case of deaf children in: Reading comprehension difficulties processes and intervention" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1996

27 Ouellet, C., "Speech and language development following cochlear implantation" 12 : 271-288, 1999

28 Kyle, J., "Reading development of deaf children" 3 : 86-97, 1980

29 King, C. M., "Reading and deafness" College-Hill Press 1985

30 Genovese, E., "Mathematical vs. Reading and Writing Disabilities in Deaf Children: A Pilot Study on the Development of Numerical Knowledge" 18 : 33-46, 2005

31 Marco, M., "Linguistic and extralinguistic communication in deaf children" 39 : 134-156, 2007

32 Quigley, S. P., "Language and deafness" College-Hill Press 1984

33 Brown, J. B., "Examination of grammatical morphemes in the language of hard -of-hearing children"

34 Moores, D. F., "Educating the deaf" Houghton Mifflin company 1987

35 Meadow, K. P., "Early manual communication in relation to the deaf child’s intellectual social, and communicative functioning" 10 (10): 321-329, 2005

36 Day, P. S., "Deaf children’s expression of communicative intentions" 19 : 367-385, 1986

37 Schlesinger, H. S., "Deaf children and Their Parents in Wonder land in: Report of the Processing of the Forth-Fourth Meeting of the Communication of American Instrucators of the Deaf" D. S. Government Printing Office 10-12, 1970

38 Lynas, W., "Controversies in the education of deaf children" 15 : 200-206, 2005

39 Moseley, M. J., "Communication therapy: An integrated approach to aural rehabilitation with deaf and hard of hearing adolescents and adults" Gallaudet university press 1996

40 Simmons, A. A., "A comparison of the type-token ratio spoken and written language of deaf and hearing children" 64 : 417-421, 1962