RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      국내 헌혈자 문진에 대한 설문조사 연구 = Survey Analysis of the Current Blood Donor Interview

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104750667

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: An objective and standardized interview process is important when screening for healthy blood donors. Our aims were to gather opinions of the interviewing nurses at blood centers on the current donor interview and to suggest improvements t...

      Background: An objective and standardized interview process is important when screening for healthy blood donors. Our aims were to gather opinions of the interviewing nurses at blood centers on the current donor interview and to suggest improvements to the interview.
      Methods: We conducted an anonymous survey consisting of five questions regarding the donor health questionnaire, which can be found on the reverse side of the donation record card. The survey targeted the interviewing nurses with more than 1 year of experience at collection sites of the Korean Red Cross and the Hanmaum blood centers. The survey was sent out and gathered via mail, fax or email between September and October of 2010.
      Results: The average self-deferral rate of donors prior to interview was 7.4%, and 66.7% of the interviewing nurses considered ‘taking medicine’ as the most common reason for donor self-deferral. The past and current history of disorders was the hardest question for nurses to determine the eligibility of the donors. Having a history of blood transfusion, surgery, tattoo or a piercing procedure, etc. within a year was the most unacceptable reason for deferred donors. The nurses strongly recommended revision of redundant questions as well as re-examining the unsolvable dilemma of questions concerning malaria.
      Conclusion: According to the survey, this study outlines the perspectives of interviewing nurses at blood centers regarding the rate and reasons for self-deferral of blood donors, the difficulties and the suggestions for improving the current donor interview. The results will be helpful in the future when proposing modifications to the donor interview.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김명한, "헌혈 문진표 개선에 관한 연구" 대한수혈학회 20 (20): 167-176, 2009

      2 O'Brien SF, "The Canadian blood donor health assessment questionnaire: lessons from history, application of cognitive science principles, and recommendations for change" 21 : 205-222, 2007

      3 Lim YA, "Study for improvement of blood center-defined donor eligibility criteria"

      4 Spencer B, "Risk for malaria in United States donors deferred for travel to malaria-endemic areas" 49 : 2335-2345, 2009

      5 Kim MH, "Investigation of the improvement of blood donor questionnaire and management of the standardization of donor eligibility decision"

      6 Zou S, "Donor deferral and resulting donor loss at the American Red Cross Blood Services, 2001 through 2006" 48 : 2531-2539, 2008

      1 김명한, "헌혈 문진표 개선에 관한 연구" 대한수혈학회 20 (20): 167-176, 2009

      2 O'Brien SF, "The Canadian blood donor health assessment questionnaire: lessons from history, application of cognitive science principles, and recommendations for change" 21 : 205-222, 2007

      3 Lim YA, "Study for improvement of blood center-defined donor eligibility criteria"

      4 Spencer B, "Risk for malaria in United States donors deferred for travel to malaria-endemic areas" 49 : 2335-2345, 2009

      5 Kim MH, "Investigation of the improvement of blood donor questionnaire and management of the standardization of donor eligibility decision"

      6 Zou S, "Donor deferral and resulting donor loss at the American Red Cross Blood Services, 2001 through 2006" 48 : 2531-2539, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.19 0.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.18 0.16 0.267 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼