삼각합병의 구조와 관련 법적 문제

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The triangular merger has been permitted as one of the corporate reorganizations since 2011 in Korea. Nevertheless, there are lots of interpretational issues in applying the provisions about triangular merger as follows : is the reverse triangular merger permitted?, is the acquiring parent company able to acquire its own shares and sell them to the acquiring subsidiary company at the parent"s own discretion?, until when is the acquiring parent company able to acquire the shares and how to acquire them?, and should the merger synergy effect be considered in calculating the values of the minority shareholders" appraisal right in the target company?
Futhermore, there would be some structural limitations in carrying out the flexibility and vitalizations of the triangular merger in comparison with the American and Japanese triangular mergers. In other words, it"s required to legislatively supplement the current provisions about triangular mergers in the following issues such as the acquiring parent"s direct issue of new shares to the target"s shareholders, acquiring subsidiary"s disclosure of material information on the parent company and legal treatment of target"s potential shares like the bonds with stock purchase warrant and convertible bonds as well as stock options. And also there are some legislative issues to be considered in the mid-long term such as in the permission of the reverse triangular merger and extension to the various types of triangular reorganizations from the triangular mergers. Lastly, considering the increasing possibilities of hostile corporate mergers and acquisitions since the revision of the Capital Market Act in 2013, appropriate responses to LBO type triangular merger and cross-border triangular merger should be reviewed in a legislative perspective.
In conclusion, this paper suggests the reasonable interpretational directions of current provisions relating to triangular merger and the legislative solutions to the above-mentioned structural limitations.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 삼각합병제도의 구조와 운용상의 해석과제
• Ⅲ. 삼각합병제도의 구조적 한계와 입법 과제
• Ⅳ. 맺음말
• 參考文獻
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2013

2 임재연, "회사법Ⅱ" 박영사 2013

3 최준선, "회사법 제7판" 삼영사 2012

4 임재연, "회사법 Ⅰ" 박영사 2013

5 김병태, "주식회사법대계(3권)" 법문사 2013

6 정명재, "주식회사법대계(3권)" 법문사 2013

7 송종준, "주식회사법대계(3권)" 법문사 2013

8 정수용, "주식회사법대계 I" 법문사 2013

9 최기원, "신회사법론" 박영사 2012

10 노혁준, "소수주주 축출제도의 도입에 관한 연구 － 도입형태와 가격산정을 중심으로－" 한국상사법학회 26 (26): 231-271, 2008

11 송종준, "소수주식 전부취득제의 입법의도와 해석방향" 한국기업법학회 26 (26): 79-106, 2012

12 황현영, "상법상 교부금합병과 삼각합병의 개선방안 연구" 한국상사판례학회 25 (25): 241-267, 2012

13 송옥렬, "상법강의" 홍문사 2013

14 법무부, "상법 회사편 해설" 2012

15 안경봉, "삼각합병제도와 과세" 법학연구소 22 (22): 259-303, 2010

16 윤영신, "삼각합병제도 도입과 활용상의 법률문제" 2013

17 김지환, "삼각합병의 활용과 법적 과제" 한국기업법학회 25 (25): 69-100, 2011

18 김건식, "국제적 기준에 부합하는 합법적 LBO 가이드라인 제정방안" 서울대 금융법센터 2011

19 신우진, "경영권 방어를 위한 자기주식의 제3자에 대한 처분의 법적 문제점" 한국기업법학회 21 (21): 139-176, 2007

20 柴全和史, "會社法の現代化に要綱試案における合倂對價の柔軟化について" 79 (79): 2004

21 江頭憲治郞, "會社法 大系 4" 靑林書院 2008

22 太田 洋, "敵對的M&A對應の最先端" 商事法務 2005

23 落合成一, "國際的合倂の法的對應"

24 中東正文, "企業組織の國際的再編"

25 藤田友敬, "企業再編對價の柔軟化․子會社の定義"

26 Arthur R. Pinto, "Understanding Corporate Law" LexisNexis 1999

27 Tad Ravazzini, "Note, The Amalgamating Reorganization Provisions : The Asymmetry in Treatment of Forward and Reverse Triangular Mergers and Other Problems" 26 : 541-, 1996

28 Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Mergers and Acquisitions" Foundation Press 2003

29 奈良輝久, "M&A法制の羅針盤" 靑林書院 2007

30 송종준, "LBO 규제체계의 비교분석과 합리적 규제방안의 모색 -유럽․미국법상 회사의 금융지원규제를 중심으로-" 법무부 (56) : 90-132, 2011

31 Charles R.T.O'Kelly, "Corporations and Other Business Associations" Aspen Law & Business 1999

32 James D. Cox, "Corporations" Aspen Law & Business 1997

33 Franklin A. Gevurtz, "Corporation Law" West Group 2000

34 Andreas Cahn, "Comparative Company Law" 2010

35 송옥렬, "2011년 개정 회사법의 해석상 주요쟁점 - 기업재무 분야를 중심으로 -" 한국법학원 (127) : 45-79, 2011