RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소크라테스 이전의 자연철학자들에 대한 포퍼와 하이데거 사상의 비교연구 = A comparative study of Heidegger`s and Popper`s views on the Pre-socratics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5046474

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Heidegger and Popper have widely divided opinions on almost all philosophical questions, even though both of them influenced the thinking world of the twentieth century greatly. Heidegger thinks that the present age is the one where the forgetfulness of Being culminated, while Popper estimates the age after the World War II as the best of all the ages that have existed. Heidegger insists that the art and the poetic thinking reveal the truth of beings, while Popper thinks that the science reveals the truth of beings. Heidegger thinks that the crisis of the present age can be overcome through the new revelation of the truth of Being, while Popper thinks that the problems of the present society can be solved through the gradual reforms based on the open discussions between the members of the society. This research supposes that the differences between Heidegger and Popper come to light most clearly in the views of both thinkers on the Pre-socratics. Popper thinks that the views of Pre-socratics on the nature are the seeds of the modern theories on the nature and the modern natural science is the development of the pre-socratic views on the nature. On the contrary, Heidegger says that the Pre-socratics have totally different understandings on the nature than the modern natural sciences and therefore the both of them can`t be compared on the same horizon. The differences between Heidegger`s and Popper`s views an the Pre-socratics are based on the radical differences between Heidegger`s and Popper`s views on the fundamental themes like the human being, the nature and the history. This research intends to reveal the differences between both thinkers on the Pre-socratics and mediate the productive conversation between them, through revealing the insights and limits of each of them.
      번역하기

      Heidegger and Popper have widely divided opinions on almost all philosophical questions, even though both of them influenced the thinking world of the twentieth century greatly. Heidegger thinks that the present age is the one where the forgetfulness ...

      Heidegger and Popper have widely divided opinions on almost all philosophical questions, even though both of them influenced the thinking world of the twentieth century greatly. Heidegger thinks that the present age is the one where the forgetfulness of Being culminated, while Popper estimates the age after the World War II as the best of all the ages that have existed. Heidegger insists that the art and the poetic thinking reveal the truth of beings, while Popper thinks that the science reveals the truth of beings. Heidegger thinks that the crisis of the present age can be overcome through the new revelation of the truth of Being, while Popper thinks that the problems of the present society can be solved through the gradual reforms based on the open discussions between the members of the society. This research supposes that the differences between Heidegger and Popper come to light most clearly in the views of both thinkers on the Pre-socratics. Popper thinks that the views of Pre-socratics on the nature are the seeds of the modern theories on the nature and the modern natural science is the development of the pre-socratic views on the nature. On the contrary, Heidegger says that the Pre-socratics have totally different understandings on the nature than the modern natural sciences and therefore the both of them can`t be compared on the same horizon. The differences between Heidegger`s and Popper`s views an the Pre-socratics are based on the radical differences between Heidegger`s and Popper`s views on the fundamental themes like the human being, the nature and the history. This research intends to reveal the differences between both thinkers on the Pre-socratics and mediate the productive conversation between them, through revealing the insights and limits of each of them.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 쿤, 토마스, "현대 과학철학 논쟁: 쿤의 패러다임 이론에 대한 옹호" 아르케 2002

      2 박찬국, "하이데거와 나치즘" 문예출판사 2001

      3 메르키오르, J. G., "푸코 Michel Foucault" 시공사 2003

      4 포퍼, 칼, "추측과 논박: 과학적 지식의 성장 1-2=Conjectures and Refutations:the Growth of Scientific Knowledge" 민음사 2001

      5 Schwan, Alexander, "Zeitkritik und Politik in Heideggers Spätphilosophie(Heidegger und die praktische)"

      6 "Wegmarken"

      7 Heidegger, Martin, "Was heißt Denken?,"

      8 "Parmenides"

      9 "Heraklit"

      10 "Grundfragen der Philosophie"

      1 쿤, 토마스, "현대 과학철학 논쟁: 쿤의 패러다임 이론에 대한 옹호" 아르케 2002

      2 박찬국, "하이데거와 나치즘" 문예출판사 2001

      3 메르키오르, J. G., "푸코 Michel Foucault" 시공사 2003

      4 포퍼, 칼, "추측과 논박: 과학적 지식의 성장 1-2=Conjectures and Refutations:the Growth of Scientific Knowledge" 민음사 2001

      5 Schwan, Alexander, "Zeitkritik und Politik in Heideggers Spätphilosophie(Heidegger und die praktische)"

      6 "Wegmarken"

      7 Heidegger, Martin, "Was heißt Denken?,"

      8 "Parmenides"

      9 "Heraklit"

      10 "Grundfragen der Philosophie"

      11 "Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik"

      12 Safranski, R, "Ein Meister aus Deutschland-Heidegger und seine Zeit" Frankfurt a.M 1997

      13 Philosophie, "Annemarie Gethmann-Siefert und Otto Pöggeler" Frankfurt a.M.:Suhrkampf 1988

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-10-05 학술지명변경 외국어명 : A semiannually Journal of Philosophical Thought in Korea -> EPOCH AND PHILOSOPHY -A Journal of Philosophical Thought in Korea- KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.61 0.61 0.62
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.62 1.3 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼