RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Express Train Seat Discomfort Evaluation using Body Pressure and Anthropometric Data

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100028258

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Korea"s Honam express train"s first- and second-class seat discomfort by using pressure measurement, subjective discomfort rating, and physical compatibility. Background: Over the years, the de...

      Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Korea"s Honam express train"s first- and second-class seat discomfort by using pressure measurement, subjective discomfort rating, and physical compatibility.

      Background: Over the years, the demand for an express train service is continually increasing. A comfortable ride is important to achieving passenger satisfaction. A train seat plays a significant role in fulfilling passenger seating comfort. With this in view, a field survey and pressure measurements were performed on the selected train seat.

      Method: The pressure ratio at the body-seat interface (thigh and buttock regions) was measured by the pressure mat system. The interface pressure ratio was calculated and compared. The subjective discomfort rating scale was used to evaluate the subjects" overall feeling. The dimensions of train seats were analysed according to the anthropometric and demographic characteristics of the population data from Size Korea.

      Results: The results highlighted that the interface pressure ratio was greater while participants sat on the second-class seat than the first-class seat in the left- and right-side thigh regions. Also the pressure ratio was greater for the participants in the 1st~25th percentile height groups (149.8~160.8cm). The subjects rated higher discomfort for the second-class seat than the first-class seat. The physical compatibility results showed that the second-class seat’s breadth was inadequate for the 95th and 99th percentile male.

      Conclusion: Overall, interface pressure measurement, subjective discomfort score and physical compatibility results showed that the second-class seat was more uncomfortable for the passengers than the first-class seat.

      Application: The adopted methodologies could be used to measure the seating comfort of the train seats.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Method
      • 3. Results
      • 4. Discussion
      • 5. Conclusion
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. Method
      • 3. Results
      • 4. Discussion
      • 5. Conclusion
      • References
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Brienze, D.M., "The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users" 82 (82): 529-533, 2001

      2 Park, "The evaluation of seating comfort by the objective measures" SAE 1997

      3 Hacaambwa, T.M., "Subjective response to seated fore-and-aft direction whole-body vibration" 37 (37): 61-72, 2007

      4 Wu, X., "Study of human-seat interface pressure distribution under vertical vibration" 21 (21): 433-449, 1998

      5 Mehta, C.R., "Seating discomfort for tractor operators - a critical review" 25 (25): 661-674, 2000

      6 Stinson, M.D., "Seat-interface pressure: a pilot study of the relationship of gender, body mass index, and seating position" 84 (84): 405-409, 2003

      7 박세진, "Ride Quality Investigation of Passenger Cars on Different Road Conditions" 대한인간공학회 32 (32): 389-396, 2013

      8 Ebe, K., "Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors" 43 (43): 771-790, 2000

      9 Eitzen, I., "Pressure mapping in seating: a frequency analysis approach" 85 (85): 1136-1140, 2004

      10 Vos, G.A., "Postural versus chair design impacts upon interface pressure" 37 (37): 619-628, 2006

      1 Brienze, D.M., "The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users" 82 (82): 529-533, 2001

      2 Park, "The evaluation of seating comfort by the objective measures" SAE 1997

      3 Hacaambwa, T.M., "Subjective response to seated fore-and-aft direction whole-body vibration" 37 (37): 61-72, 2007

      4 Wu, X., "Study of human-seat interface pressure distribution under vertical vibration" 21 (21): 433-449, 1998

      5 Mehta, C.R., "Seating discomfort for tractor operators - a critical review" 25 (25): 661-674, 2000

      6 Stinson, M.D., "Seat-interface pressure: a pilot study of the relationship of gender, body mass index, and seating position" 84 (84): 405-409, 2003

      7 박세진, "Ride Quality Investigation of Passenger Cars on Different Road Conditions" 대한인간공학회 32 (32): 389-396, 2013

      8 Ebe, K., "Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors" 43 (43): 771-790, 2000

      9 Eitzen, I., "Pressure mapping in seating: a frequency analysis approach" 85 (85): 1136-1140, 2004

      10 Vos, G.A., "Postural versus chair design impacts upon interface pressure" 37 (37): 619-628, 2006

      11 Yong, W.H., "Multidimensional coefficient approach to comfort evaluating for high-speed train" 12 (12): 2036-2041, 2014

      12 British Standards Institution, "Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock"

      13 International Organization for Standardization, "ISO2631, Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration"

      14 Code, U.I.C., "Guidelines for evaluating passenger comfort in relation to vibration in railway vehicles"

      15 Dunk, N.M., "Gender-based differences in postural responses to seated exposures" 20 (20): 1101-1110, 2005

      16 Na, S., "Evaluation of driver's discomfort and postural change using dynamic body pressure distribution" 35 (35): 1085-1096, 2005

      17 Jahansson, A., "Evaluation of discomfort using real-time measurements of whole body vibration and seat pressure distribution while driving trucks" Lulea University of Technology 2006

      18 Nahvi, H, "Evaluating automobile road vibrations using BS 6841 and ISO 2631 comfort criteria" 2006

      19 박세진, "Evaluating Methods of Vibration Exposure and Ride Comfort in Car" 대한인간공학회 32 (32): 381-387, 2013

      20 Park, S.J., "Dynamic ride quality investigation for passenger car" SAE 1998

      21 Kim, T.H., "Dynamic ride quality investigation and DB of ride values for passenger and RV cars" SAE 2001

      22 Kyung, G., "Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): relationships with and prediction from interface pressure" 38 (38): 526-538, 2008

      23 Dhingra, H., "Discomfort, pressure distribution and safety in operator's seat - a critical review" V : 2003

      24 Park, S.J., "Development of evaluating system for ride comfort and fatigue in vehicle" SAE 2001

      25 Shen, W., "Development of a pressure related assessment model of seating discomfort" SAGE Publication 37 (37): 831-835, 1993

      26 Kumar, A., "Characterization of occupant comfort in automotive seats, Automotive Body Interior and Safety Systems" 1-4, 1994

      27 Ziolek, S., "Beyond percentiles: an examination of occupant anthropometry and seat design" SAE 2004

      28 Andrew, I., "Anthropometric survey of British rail footplate staff" 3 (3): 132-135, 1972

      29 Kolich, M., "A conceptual framework proposed to formalize the scientific investigation of automobile seat comfort" 39 (39): 15-27, 2008

      30 Seigler, T.M, "A comparative analysis of air-inflated and foam seat cushions for truck seats" Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2002

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.19 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼