In 2025, South Korea is expected to enter an ultra-aging society, and elderly traffic crimes have become a significant social issue. While overall traffic crimes have been declining recently, elderly traffic crimes are occurring at a relatively higher...
In 2025, South Korea is expected to enter an ultra-aging society, and elderly traffic crimes have become a significant social issue. While overall traffic crimes have been declining recently, elderly traffic crimes are occurring at a relatively higher rate compared to other crimes. This phenomenon can be seen as an inevitable consequence of the changing demographics in our society. Academic interest in aging has primarily been focused on fields like sociology and gerontology. However, it is now necessary to deeply reflect on this issue within the field of criminology, particularly from the perspective of traffic crimes.
Elderly drivers cannot deny the decline in physical abilities related to driving skills compared to other age groups. Regarding such countermeasures, examples of proposed systems include the ‘Voluntary Driver's License Surrender System’ and the ‘Conditional License System’. However, many issues have been raised regarding the effectiveness of these systems. It is a critical time for fundamental reflection on whether the regulations ensure the practical function of tests that assess driving ability, whether the occupational and regional characteristics of the elderly are properly taken into account, and whether the protection of the elderly's right to mobility is appropriately balanced. There is undoubtedly an effect of accident prevention through control and regulation. However, before proposing such countermeasures, emphasizing efficiency without ensuring at least the basic rights to mobility and freedom, and forcing the elderly to endure daily inconveniences due to their age, is not the direction our society should pursue.
Everyone inevitably experiences a decline in physical abilities as they age. There is no doubt about the importance of preventive measures related to these human characteristics.
However, in the case of elderly drivers, it is necessary to approach the issue from a different perspective than that of general adult traffic crime, and there needs to be an inspection to ensure that the system not only serves a formal purpose but also functions properly in assessing the driving ability of elderly drivers. It is not desirable to impose uniform restrictions on the right to mobility solely based on the characteristics of elderly drivers.
Instead of proposing new systems, the focus should be on the effectiveness of operating the current system to actually assess driving ability.