RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      노동 4.0 백서의 후속 입법 동향과 법・정책 과제 ― 고용분야를 중심으로 ― = Follow-up Legislative Trends and Policy Tasks in the Labor 4.0 White Paper — Focusing on the Sector of Employment —

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108155352

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Germany, the importance of acquiring new vocational qualifications through continuous vocational training so that workers can maintain and expand their employment abilities even under the Fourth Industrial Revolution is coming to be recognized at the government level.
      Therefore, in the German Labor 4.0 White Paper, several proposals have been made on the basic direction of the legislative policy to support these workers.
      In addition, the proposal of the white paper is in the form of expanding the scope of application of the continuous vocational training cost support system and the labor wage subsidy system as stipulated by Article 82 of Part III of the Social Code under the Empowerment of Vocational Qualification Opportunities Act in November 2018 and the Labor Act of May 2020 It is embodied as. In particular, the target is workers currently engaged in occupations exposed to the possibility of substitution by technology.
      The development (progress) of the 4th industrial revolution (digitalization) emerges a new form of work (employment) called cloud work that receives and processes work through a digital platform. Such cloud work provides a new flexible opportunity for cloud workers, but there are also concerns about becoming a “new unstable employment type” due to the instability of orders and the vulnerability to social risks.
      However, there are certain limitations in protecting cloud workers under labor law. Therefore, in the context of “Labor 4.0”, the basic direction of legislative policy for the protection of cloud (platform) workers is also discussed. In particular, various initiatives have come to the present, focusing on policy documents by the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs. Particularly important as government documents are ANPACKEN and ECKPUNKTE.
      번역하기

      In Germany, the importance of acquiring new vocational qualifications through continuous vocational training so that workers can maintain and expand their employment abilities even under the Fourth Industrial Revolution is coming to be recognized at t...

      In Germany, the importance of acquiring new vocational qualifications through continuous vocational training so that workers can maintain and expand their employment abilities even under the Fourth Industrial Revolution is coming to be recognized at the government level.
      Therefore, in the German Labor 4.0 White Paper, several proposals have been made on the basic direction of the legislative policy to support these workers.
      In addition, the proposal of the white paper is in the form of expanding the scope of application of the continuous vocational training cost support system and the labor wage subsidy system as stipulated by Article 82 of Part III of the Social Code under the Empowerment of Vocational Qualification Opportunities Act in November 2018 and the Labor Act of May 2020 It is embodied as. In particular, the target is workers currently engaged in occupations exposed to the possibility of substitution by technology.
      The development (progress) of the 4th industrial revolution (digitalization) emerges a new form of work (employment) called cloud work that receives and processes work through a digital platform. Such cloud work provides a new flexible opportunity for cloud workers, but there are also concerns about becoming a “new unstable employment type” due to the instability of orders and the vulnerability to social risks.
      However, there are certain limitations in protecting cloud workers under labor law. Therefore, in the context of “Labor 4.0”, the basic direction of legislative policy for the protection of cloud (platform) workers is also discussed. In particular, various initiatives have come to the present, focusing on policy documents by the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs. Particularly important as government documents are ANPACKEN and ECKPUNKTE.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최홍기, "직업능력개발훈련법제에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2018

      2 관계부처 합동, "사람 중심의 플랫폼 경제를 위한 플랫폼 종사자 보호대책" 2020

      3 오상호, "독일 플랫폼 노동 종사자의 법적 지위와 보호에 관한 연구" 비교법학연구소 62 : 1-46, 2021

      4 일자리위원회, "노동시장 변화에 대응한 직업능력개발 혁신방안" 2019

      5 관계부처 합동, "『한국판 뉴딜』 종합계획" 2020

      6 Röder, "Technologischer Wandel und Betriebsänderung Bringen Industrie 4. 0 und E-Mobilität den „Qualifizierungssozialplan?" 1289 : 2017

      7 Brunswick, "Shaping the Workforce of the Future"

      8 Göpfert/Brune, "Moderne Führungsinstrumente auf dem arbeitsrechtlichen Prüfstand" 87 : 2018

      9 Ricken, "Matrixstrukturen und Fremdpersonal als Herausforderungen der Mitbestimmung bei personellen Einzelmaßnahmen" 535 : 2016

      10 Kleinebrink, "Initiativrechte des Betriebsrats auf digitale Weiterbildung der Arbeitnehmer" 254 : 2018

      1 최홍기, "직업능력개발훈련법제에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2018

      2 관계부처 합동, "사람 중심의 플랫폼 경제를 위한 플랫폼 종사자 보호대책" 2020

      3 오상호, "독일 플랫폼 노동 종사자의 법적 지위와 보호에 관한 연구" 비교법학연구소 62 : 1-46, 2021

      4 일자리위원회, "노동시장 변화에 대응한 직업능력개발 혁신방안" 2019

      5 관계부처 합동, "『한국판 뉴딜』 종합계획" 2020

      6 Röder, "Technologischer Wandel und Betriebsänderung Bringen Industrie 4. 0 und E-Mobilität den „Qualifizierungssozialplan?" 1289 : 2017

      7 Brunswick, "Shaping the Workforce of the Future"

      8 Göpfert/Brune, "Moderne Führungsinstrumente auf dem arbeitsrechtlichen Prüfstand" 87 : 2018

      9 Ricken, "Matrixstrukturen und Fremdpersonal als Herausforderungen der Mitbestimmung bei personellen Einzelmaßnahmen" 535 : 2016

      10 Kleinebrink, "Initiativrechte des Betriebsrats auf digitale Weiterbildung der Arbeitnehmer" 254 : 2018

      11 Krause, "Herausforderung Digitalisierung der Arbeitswelt und Arbeiten 4. 0" 53 : 2017

      12 Klinkhammer/Peters, "Fortbildungsvereinbarung eine nützliche Inves-tition mit Risiken" 369 : 2015

      13 BMAS, "Fairer Arbeit in der Plattformökonomie"

      14 Kocher, "Diskontinuitiit von Erwerbsbiografien und das Normalarbeitsrecht-Der Umgang mit Unsicherheiten" 841 : 2010

      15 Ahlers, "Digitalisierung : Dienstleistungsarbeit im Visier" Hans-Böckler-Stiftung 2018

      16 Kurt, "Die berufliche Weiterbildung im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung als milderes Mittel im Kündigungsschutzrecht" 230 : 2017

      17 Granz, "Die Ankündigung von Personalentwicklungsmaßnahmen arbeitsrechtliche Erwägungen(Teil 2)" 171 : 2013

      18 Wisskirchen, "Der unzeitgemäße Arbeitnehmer: Die Änderung von Anforderungen an Mitarbeiter als Kündigungsgrund" 1386 : 2008

      19 Franzen, "Das Mitbestimmungsrecht des Betriebsrats bei der Einführung von Maßnahmen der betrieblichen Berufsbildung nach § 97 II BetrVG" 865 : 2001

      20 Sandmann, "Arbeitsrechtliche Probleme der Arbeitnehmerweiterbildung in : Zeitschrift flir Arbeitsrecht" 295 : 2002

      21 Hanau, "Arbeits-und Sozialversicherungsrecht 4. 0 im Weißbuch des BMAS" 213 : 2017

      22 BMAS, "Arbeiten 4.0 Weissbuch"

      23 BMAS, "ANPACKEN"

      24 고용노동부, "2021년 플랫폼 종사자 규모와 근무실태" 2021

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 0.99
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.89 0.82 1.527 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼