Prajnakaragupta(ca. 780-840) disallows `the excluded particular (vy avrttasvalaksana)` in the any apoha which S akyabuddhi(ca. 660-720) classifies into the three kinds. Because of `the excluded particular` does not exist in reality.
It is implied by ...
Prajnakaragupta(ca. 780-840) disallows `the excluded particular (vy avrttasvalaksana)` in the any apoha which S akyabuddhi(ca. 660-720) classifies into the three kinds. Because of `the excluded particular` does not exist in reality.
It is implied by the definition to he`s the epistemological theory of having an apearance explaining the yog ac ara on the basis of self cognition. Because of, in according to Prajnakaragupta`s opinion, the reason that other-exclusion( any apoha) connected with the image of an object, or pratibimbaka.
According to Praj n akaragupta, there is no need to external entities for the sake of linguistic item which refer to word meaning. Because of Prajnakaragupta refuse to acknowledge sameness(ekat a) or an intimate (genetic) connection between word meaning and real entities and word meaning resides in the mind (inner faculty, buddhi). he thinks that the qualifier, the qualified and their connection do not exist in reality.
Though Prajnakaragupta also regards the referents (artha) as a conception`s apearance is formed by vasan a, not an external something or s am anya such as Dharmakirti. In the view of Praj n akaragupta, apoha theory was centred in the conceptual functions of language.