REVIEW OF VARIOUS DYNAMIC MODELING METHODS AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTUITIVE MODELING METHOD FOR DYNAMIC SYSTEMS

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Conventional static reliability analysis methods are inadequate for modeling dynamic interactions between components
of a system. Various techniques such as dynamic fault tree, dynamic Bayesian networks, and dynamic reliability block diagrams
have been proposed for modeling dynamic systems based on improvement of the conventional modeling methods. In this paper,
we review these methods briefly and introduce dynamic nodes to the existing reliability graph with general gates (RGGG) as
an intuitive modeling method to model dynamic systems. For a quantitative analysis, we use a discrete-time method to
convert an RGGG to an equivalent Bayesian network and develop a software tool for generation of probability tables.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 R. Gulati, "“A Modular Approach for Analyzing Static and Dynamic Fault Trees" Philadelphia 1997

2 K.J. Sullivan, "The Galileo Fault Tree Analysis Tool" Madison 1999

3 D. Codetta-Raiteri, "The Conversion of Dynamic Fault Trees to Stochastic Petri Nets, as a Case of Graph Transformation" 127 : 45-, 2005

4 V. Volovoi, "Stochastic Petri Nets Modeling using SPN@" Newport Beach 2006

5 M.C. Kim, "Reliability Graph with General Gates: an Intuitive and Practical Method for System Reliability Analysis" 78 : 239-, 2002

6 S. Montani, "Radyban: A Tool for Reliability Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees through Conversion into Dynamic Bayesian Networks" 93 : 922-, 2008

7 R.M. Sinnamon, "Quantitative Fault Tree Analysis using Binary Decision Diagrams" 30 : 1051-, 1996

8 A. Rauzy, "New Algorithms for Fault Tree Analysis" 40 : 203-, 1993

9 S.F. Galán, "Networks of Probabilistic Events in Discrete Time" 30 : 181-, 2002

10 V. Volovoi, "Modeling of System Reliability using Petri Nets with Aging Tokens" 84 (84): 2004

11 G. Chiola, "GreatSPN 1.7: Graphical Editor and Analyzer for Timed and Stochastic Petri Nets" 24 : 47-, 1995

12 G. Chiola, "Generalized Stochastic Petri Nets: A Definition at the Net Level and its Implications" 19 (19): 1993

13 A. Ejlali, "FPGA-based Monte Carlo Simulation for Fault Tree Analysis" 44 (44): 2004

14 J.B. Dugan, "Dynamic Fault -Tree Models for Fault-Tolerant Computer Systems" 41 : 363-, 1992

15 J.B. Dugan, "Developing a Low-Cost High-Quality Software Tool for Dynamic Fault- Tree Analysis" 49 (49): 2000

16 S. Distefano, "Dependability Modeling and Analysis in Dynamic Systems" Long Beach 2007

17 T. Aldemir, "Current State of Reliability Modeling Methodologies for Digital Systems and Their Acceptance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Assessments" NRC 2006

18 R. Manian, "Bridging the Gap between Systems and Dynamic Fault Tree Models" Washington DC 1999

19 M.C. Kim, "A computational method for probabilistic safety assessment of I&C systems and human operators in nuclear power plants" 91 : 580-, 2006

20 M.C. Kim, "A computational method for probabilistic safety assessment of I&C systems and human operators in nuclear power plants" 91 : 580-, 2006

21 S. Amari, "A New Approach to Solve Dynamic Fault Trees" Tampa 2003

22 S. Distefano, "A New Approach to Modeling the System Reliability: Dynamic Reliability Block Diagrams" Newport Beach 2006

23 A. Bobbio, "A Modeling Framework to Implement Preemption Policies in Non- Markovian SPNs" 26 : 36-, 2000

24 H. Boudali, "A Contiuous-Time Bayesian Network Reliability Modeling, and Analysis Framework" 55 (55): 2006