RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      High School Students’ Understanding of Genetic Concepts and Their Difficulties in Learning Genetics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104048325

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present study aims to look into what level of understanding high school students have about basic concepts of genetics and what difficulties they have in their learning genetics. The instruments used were an open-ended questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. As a result of examining students’ basic conceptions about genetics, we found that a large majority of the students had misconceptions in all the sections, namely, the concepts of gene, DNA and chromosome, the genetic characteristics of somatic and germ cells, the transfer of gene information, and the determination of sex. Speaking of students’ difficulties with genetics, some of their opinions in regard to textbooks were shortage of basic concepts explanation and the related exercise queries, shortage of mathematics-related explanation, and shortage of diverse activities of exploration, while some of their opinions in regard to teachers’ instruction method were no sufficient provision of diverse exercise queries and visual aids in class, more need of learning time in class, and more need of real life-related explanation in class.
      번역하기

      The present study aims to look into what level of understanding high school students have about basic concepts of genetics and what difficulties they have in their learning genetics. The instruments used were an open-ended questionnaire and a semi-str...

      The present study aims to look into what level of understanding high school students have about basic concepts of genetics and what difficulties they have in their learning genetics. The instruments used were an open-ended questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. As a result of examining students’ basic conceptions about genetics, we found that a large majority of the students had misconceptions in all the sections, namely, the concepts of gene, DNA and chromosome, the genetic characteristics of somatic and germ cells, the transfer of gene information, and the determination of sex. Speaking of students’ difficulties with genetics, some of their opinions in regard to textbooks were shortage of basic concepts explanation and the related exercise queries, shortage of mathematics-related explanation, and shortage of diverse activities of exploration, while some of their opinions in regard to teachers’ instruction method were no sufficient provision of diverse exercise queries and visual aids in class, more need of learning time in class, and more need of real life-related explanation in class.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      본 연구의 목적은 고등학생들의 유전 기본 개념 이해 정도와 유전학습에서 겪는 어려움을 알아보는데 있다. 조사방법으로는 개방적 질문법과 반구조적 면담법을 활용하였다. 유전에 관한 기본 개념 검사 결과, 유전자와 DNA, 염색체에 대한 개념, 체세포와 생식세포의 유전적 특성, 유전정보의 전달, 성 결정 검사항목 모두에서 대다수 학생들이 오개념을 가지고 있었다. 유전학습에서 겪는 어려움 중에서 교과서와 관련해서는 기본 개념 설명과 그와 관련된 연습문제가 부족한 점, 수학적 관련 설명이 부족한 점, 다양한 탐구활동이 부족한 점 등을 들었으며, 교사의 수업 방법에 의해 겪는 어려움으로는 다양한 연습문제와 시각적 자료 제시가 부족하다는 점과, 더 많은 학습시간과 실생활 관련 설명이 필요하다는 의견을 제시하였다.
      번역하기

      본 연구의 목적은 고등학생들의 유전 기본 개념 이해 정도와 유전학습에서 겪는 어려움을 알아보는데 있다. 조사방법으로는 개방적 질문법과 반구조적 면담법을 활용하였다. 유전에 관한 ...

      본 연구의 목적은 고등학생들의 유전 기본 개념 이해 정도와 유전학습에서 겪는 어려움을 알아보는데 있다. 조사방법으로는 개방적 질문법과 반구조적 면담법을 활용하였다. 유전에 관한 기본 개념 검사 결과, 유전자와 DNA, 염색체에 대한 개념, 체세포와 생식세포의 유전적 특성, 유전정보의 전달, 성 결정 검사항목 모두에서 대다수 학생들이 오개념을 가지고 있었다. 유전학습에서 겪는 어려움 중에서 교과서와 관련해서는 기본 개념 설명과 그와 관련된 연습문제가 부족한 점, 수학적 관련 설명이 부족한 점, 다양한 탐구활동이 부족한 점 등을 들었으며, 교사의 수업 방법에 의해 겪는 어려움으로는 다양한 연습문제와 시각적 자료 제시가 부족하다는 점과, 더 많은 학습시간과 실생활 관련 설명이 필요하다는 의견을 제시하였다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lewis J., "What’ in a cell? Young people’ understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual" 34 (34): 129-132, 2000

      2 Law, N., "Using an iconic modeling tool to support the learning of genetics concepts" 38 (38): 118-141, 2004

      3 Topcu, M., "Turkish middle school students’ difficulties in learning genetics concepts" 6 (6): 55-62, 2009

      4 Lewis, J., "Traits, genes, particles and information: Re-visiting students’ understanding of genetics" 26 (26): 195-205, 2004

      5 Beeth, M. E., "Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool" 82 (82): 343-356, 1998

      6 Bahar, M., "Students’ learning difficulties in biology: Reasons and Solutions" 10 (10): 73-82, 2002

      7 Marbach-Ad, G., "Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena" 34 (34): 200-210, 2000

      8 Quiles-Pardo, J., "Students and teachers misapplication of Le Chatelier’s Principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium" 32 (32): 939-957, 1995

      9 Hand, B., "Student achievement and science curriculum development using a constructive framework" 91 (91): 172-176, 1991

      10 Duncan, R. G., "Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: students’understandings of molecular genetics" 44 (44): 938-959, 2007

      1 Lewis J., "What’ in a cell? Young people’ understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual" 34 (34): 129-132, 2000

      2 Law, N., "Using an iconic modeling tool to support the learning of genetics concepts" 38 (38): 118-141, 2004

      3 Topcu, M., "Turkish middle school students’ difficulties in learning genetics concepts" 6 (6): 55-62, 2009

      4 Lewis, J., "Traits, genes, particles and information: Re-visiting students’ understanding of genetics" 26 (26): 195-205, 2004

      5 Beeth, M. E., "Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool" 82 (82): 343-356, 1998

      6 Bahar, M., "Students’ learning difficulties in biology: Reasons and Solutions" 10 (10): 73-82, 2002

      7 Marbach-Ad, G., "Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena" 34 (34): 200-210, 2000

      8 Quiles-Pardo, J., "Students and teachers misapplication of Le Chatelier’s Principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium" 32 (32): 939-957, 1995

      9 Hand, B., "Student achievement and science curriculum development using a constructive framework" 91 (91): 172-176, 1991

      10 Duncan, R. G., "Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: students’understandings of molecular genetics" 44 (44): 938-959, 2007

      11 Cakır, M., "Prospective biology teachers’ understanding of genetics concepts" 2001

      12 Tsui, C. Y., "Learning genetics with computer dragons" 37 (37): 96-98, 2003

      13 Bahar, M., "Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests" 33 (33): 134-141, 1999

      14 Wynne, C. F., "High school students’use of meiosis when solving genetics problems" 23 (23): 501-515, 2001

      15 Corn, J., "Genomics analogy model for educators (GAME): from jumping genes to alternative splicing" 39 (39): 24-26, 2004

      16 Lewis, J., "Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance–do students see any relationship?" 22 (22): 177-195, 2000

      17 Friedrichsen, P. M., "Examining students’conceptions of molecular genetics in an introductory biology course for non-science majors" 2004

      18 Köse, S., "Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method" 3 (3): 283-293, 2008

      19 Lewis J., "Chromosomes: the missing link - young people’ understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilization" 34 (34): 189-197, 2000

      20 Yip, D. Y., "Children’s misconceptions on reproduction and implications for teaching" 33 (33): 21-27, 1998

      21 Gili, M, "Attempting to break the code in student comprehension of genetic concepts" 35 (35): 183-190, 2001

      22 Thomas, G. V., "An introduction to the psychology of children’s drawings" Harvester Wheat Sheaf 1990

      23 Ginns, I. S., "An analysis of scientific understandings of preservice elementary teacher education students" 32 (32): 205-222, 1995

      24 Lewis J., "All in the genes? Young people’ understanding of the nature of genes" 34 (34): 74-78, 2000

      25 Abraham, M. R., "A cross-age study of the understanding of five concepts" 31 (31): 147-165, 1994

      26 Driver, R., "A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science" 13 (13): 105-122, 1986

      27 Calik, M., "A comparison of level of understanding of eighth- grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts" 42 (42): 638-667, 2005

      28 Saka, A., "A Cross-Age Study of the Understanding of Three Genetic Concepts: How Do They Image the Gene, DNA and Chromosome?" 15 (15): 192-202, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-06-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Teacher Education KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.21 1.21 1.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.09 1.03 1.544 0.52
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼