(사)한국인물사연구회 회칙 외

편집부(편집자) 한국인물사연구회 2015 한국인물사연구 Vol.24 No.-

(사)한국인물사연구회 회칙 외

편집부(편집자) 한국인물사연구회 2016 한국인물사연구 Vol.26 No.-

독립운동기 인물사연구의 현황과 과제

이명화 한국인물사연구소 2004 한국인물사연구 Vol.1 No.-

사단법인 한국인물사연구소 연혁과 현황

편집부 (편집자) 한국인물사연구소 2004 한국인물사연구 Vol.1 No.-

한국불교 인물사연구의 현황과 과제

김두진 한국인물사연구소 2004 한국인물사연구 Vol.1 No.-

李安社의 全州 出去에 관한 연구

허인욱 (사)한국인물사연구회 2014 한국인물사연구 Vol.21 No.-

To summarize the above discussions, Lee Ansa, who was born in the 19th year of King Gojong's reign, emigrated to Samcheok around the 39th year of King Gojong's reign because of the conflict he had with Sanseongbyeolgam, who was dispatched to Jeonju at the time. Not long after the emigration to Samcheok, in the 40th year of King Gojong's reign, when the Mongolian military led by Yeku invaded, he went to Dootasanseong to take refuge and moved to Uiju in the spring of the 41st year of King Gojong's reign after the Mongolian military retreated. The background of Lee Ansa's emigration was basically in the fact that he was related to Lee Euibang, hence was the target of surveillance and containment. In addition, there was a latent conflict due to the tyranny of the dispatched government officials on local people. The conflict further caused gisaeng problem, thus Lee Ansa had to emigrate to Samcheok and then to Uiju with his followers. Although the northern emigration of Lee Ansa was due to the tyranny of government official, it was considered as an act of treason within Goryo. However, the document only records it as a dispute over a gisaeng. This is because the Joseon Dynasty was established on the basis of Confucian ideology, hyo(filial duty) and choong (fidelity), hence it could not be disclosed as an act of treason as it was. Therefore the dissonance with the official and submission process to Mongol were minimized, while the gisaeng problem was emphasized, turning it into merely personal and humanistic case. This can be also found from fact that Lee Ansa built a ship to defend from Japanese attack and was assigned as Uiju Byeongmasa to protect from the soldiers of the Yuan Dynasty. Justification or legitimacy was intended to be conferred by stressing that the emigration was an inevitable choice and he still worked for Goryo while understating the betrayal and surrender to Mongol.

燕山君의 슬픔과 분노

김창규(Kim, chang-gyu) 한국인물사연구회 2013 한국인물사연구 Vol.19 No.-

Yeonsangun has been regarded as a figure who was lack of logical reason. In short, he was a man of rich emotion rather than reason. In addition, he had a fatal defect in his characteristics caused by deficiency of maternal affection and love. This kind of personality eventually produced a big tragedy at his outburst of anger connected to the political situation. After all, Yeonsangun was expelled by his subjects. But, their moral justification called "Reforming of the Government" by deposing the king was denied by the public at once, because they were regarded as profiteers who expelled their lord for their personal interests and prosperity by taking advantage of the confusion. Thus, Jungjong Restoration called Jungjong-banjeong can be interpreted as a rebel made by meritorious subjects" desire and reforming of the government they argued was just for a justification. For the subjects who had a strong will desire of co-governance by king and subjects, the king like Yeonsangun was the one to be overthrown or expelled, and the expelled king could not be "king" any more even after his death. Even today, Yeonsangun has been said as a tyrant in Korean history. It deserves of his anger. Confrontation and conflict between the king and his subjects had continued in the desire of own"s royal authority and co-governance by king and subjects throughout the Chosun dynasty. Inner conflict among subjects had also continued with their desire and will, which was called party conflict. Yeonsangun"s violence and misgovernment is eventually his own responsibility. He should have understood the situations in balance and controlled his emotion. In addition, he should have refrained from impulse and shown his generosity to his subjects to touch them because he was their king. Yeonsangun shows how deficient human"s excessive desire leads to not only personal desolation, but also destroy of a country and society.

雲養 金允植의 記文 硏究

권진옥(Kwon, Jin-ok) 한국인물사연구회 2015 한국인물사연구 Vol.24 No.-

The study investigates literature feature of Unyang(雲養) Kim, Yunshik(金允植)’s kimun(記文). His literature seek the statecraft writing(經世之文) that reject ostentatious and aim at factual events, moreover writes the majestic work(奇偉之文) that involves bizarre flavor. And the canon of classical chinese prose is ancient writings of Dang and Song period(唐宋古文) Kim, Yunshik(金允植)’s kimun(記文) has a total of 49 works. 43 works is about building’s kimun(記文), 6 works is about landscape’s kimun(記文). Throughout his lifetime, he writes kimun(記文) A feature of Kim, Yunshik(金允植)’s kimun(記文) is three value. The first thing is spatial reconstitution through imagination. His kimun(記文) enlarges esthetics experience and awareness of space through the pursuing about superiority world’s excitement and beauty. The second thing is distribution of volume-chapter, letter-phrase(篇章字句) in classical chinese prose rhetoric aspect. In volume-chapter’s aspect, Kim, Yunshik(金允植)’s kimun(記文) gives prominence to a topic by organic connecting the paragraphs. In letter-phrase’s aspect, his kimun(記文) takes account of rhetoric aspect by emphasis change. The third thing is an eccentricity about landscape. Throughout his lifetime, he enjoys landscape sightseeing, has particular interest about Ryu, jongwon(柳宗元)’s landscape essays. On closer scrutiny, most his kimun(記文) is stirred and wrote by especial interest and taste at landscape. Unyangjip(雲養集) achieves lately complete translation, therefore we expect a extensive study about Kim, Yunshik(金允植) in the future.

순조~고종대 지밀방 궁녀의 삶과 직무

구혜인(Koo Hyein) 한국인물사연구회 2014 한국인물사연구 Vol.22 No.-

The woman introduced in this atticle is identified only as Ha. She served as a court lady fOt more than seventy years from the reign of King Sunjo (r. 1800-1834) to that of King Gojong (1863-1907). She rose to the highest position among all court ladies, that of Jejo Sanggung, and was responsible for handling matters pertaining to all the property that belonged to the women’s section of the Royal Court under the control of the queen. Various historical materials contain details about the date of her death, the location of her parents’ house, her duties and salary, and her complex network of cliques among other things. Her career at the royal court coincided with the period spanning the door-opening of the Joseon Dynasty and the foundation of the Korean Empire (Daehan, 1897-1910). During that period, the Joseon Dynasty underwent epochal changes. As the highest court lady, she had to carry out her duties by maintaining the traditions of the Royal Court while simultaneously adapting to the changes in the early modern period. Research on the life of Lady Ha has enabled researchers to shed light on the considerable role played by court ladies in the development of the handicrafts of the Royal Court, the details of which have remained obscure until now. The results of research on her life as a court lady can be exploited in a variety of relevant research areas. Her story is not merely a story about an individual: Rather, it offers a glimpse of the political, economic, and cultural influence of a high-ranking court lady and the type of network of social relationships she maintained with others within the Royal Court. It is thought that the content of this article could also serve as a useful material for studies of women’s social activities, including those associated with fine art, during the Joseon Period.

13세기 대거란전과 김취려 - 김취려에 대한 인물사적 평가

한국인물사연구회 2011 한국인물사연구 Vol.15 No.-

<P>Kim Ch’uiryrŏ (1172-1234) is the person who played a crucial role in protecting Koryŏ from the invasions of Khitan hordes and moreover in concluding the first Koryŏ-Mongol contract in the early 1219. This paper considers his life focusing on how the evaluation on his achievement has changed since his contemporary 13th century up to now.</P><P> Kim Ch’uiryŏ has been getting recognition usually for his efforts in successfully fighting back several invasions from Khitan since 1216. Yet his achievement came to be highlighted only during the 14th century, the period of Yuan intervention, by Yi Chehyŏn. Yi Chehyŏn especially put the emphasis on Kim’s achievement in concluding the the brotherly alliance of 1219 between the Mogol and Koryŏ. Yi’s assessment is due to the fact that the brotherly alliance contained essential significance in defying the Koryŏ-Yuan union proposal raised in the Koryŏ society that was under high political pressure from Yuan.</P><P> Kim Ch’uiryŏ makes a superb example as a public servant not only for his military and diplomatic achievements. He also embodies great principles of public service with rigorous administrative skills, consideration for his subordinates, and the modesty not to boast about his achievement. This aspect would give us an even more important lesson than his military and diplomatic achievement in our time.</P>