대화형 인공지능의 윤리적 언어 표현을 위한 기초 연구

조태린(Cho, Tae-Rin),김신각(Kim, Shin-Gak),유희재(Yu, Hui-Jae),김예지(Kim, Ye-Ji),이주희(Lee, Ju-Hee) 한국어문학회 2018 語文學 Vol.0 No.140

The purpose of this study is to set up the concept and classification standard of unethical linguistic expressions(ULEs) as word unit that can appear in the machine learning of interactive artificial intelligence systems and humans conversation. The study also examined the characteristics of each type, based on examples. According to the results of the study, ULEs as word unit can be divided into three categories: ‘swear words’, ‘vulgar words’, and ‘derogatory slangs’. These three types are common in that they are all regarded as ULEs in any variance of emergence. However, they differ in two attributes, aggression and degradation. This study also suggests that there are two other types of ULEs: the ‘Context’ type, in which certain expressions may or may not be used unethically according to the context, and the ‘Content’ type, which can not be considered unethical linguistic expression in of itself, but its related content can be unethical linguistic expression overall. Therefore, this study identifies that the word-based unethical linguistic expression is classified into five types such as ‘swear words’, ‘vulgar words’, ‘derogatory slang’, ‘context’, and ‘content’, and each of these characteristics and examples were reviewed extensively.

제주어와 제주방언, 이름의 정치언어학

조태린(Cho, Tae-Rin) 한국어문학회 2014 語文學 Vol.0 No.126

There are many ways which call the vernacular of Jeju island. For example, Jeju dialect, Jejudo dialect, Jeju patois, Tamla language, Jeju language, etc. Recently, the frequency in use of ‘Jeju language’ is on the increase. The purpose of this paper is to examine the change of names which call vernacular of Jeju island and to analyse the reason of this change. First of all, this paper starts with a critical review of the precedent discussions about the concept of language and dialect and their relations. This review enables us to overcome the limitations of the formal linguistic viewpoint about the relations between language and dialect. And then, examining the use aspect of the term ‘Jeju language’ and ‘Jeju dialect’, this paper analyses the concept of ‘Jeju language’ and the reason of this usage. This analysis result facilitates, not only our understanding of extralinguistic strained relations between ‘Jeju language’ and ‘Jeju dialect’, but also a good grasp on significance and problem of using the term ‘Jeju language’ which supplants the term ‘Jeju dialect’.

한국어 방언과 방언 연구의 변화에 대한 소고

조태린(Cho Tae Rin) 한국사회언어학회 2015 사회언어학 Vol.23 No.1

The purpose of this paper is to examine the changing shape of regional dialect and social dialect in Korea, finally in order to seek the possibility of change and development direction of the Korean dialect researches. Firstly, this paper reviews not only the conceptual difference between regional dialect and social dialect but also the changing shape of actual relation between regional dialect research and social dialect research in Korea. And then, signs of change in Korean dialect research are analyzed by looking at the current state and characteristics of Korean social dialect research. This analysis shows that the distinction between regional dialect research and social dialect research is no longer rigid, and that Korean dialect research needs a new approach and development direction in order to go beyond the earlier researches focused on regional dialect and level of phoneme, prosody, vocabulary, etc. Finally, this paper is concluded by proposing two development directions of Korean dialect research as follows. (1) Research on regional and social difference of Korean language on a level of discourse. (2) Research on aspect of contact among standard language and dialects in Korea.

인문학으로서의 국어 연구의 대중화ㆍ실용화

조태린(Cho, Tae-rin) 한국어문학회 2012 語文學 Vol.0 No.115

The purpose of this paper is to examine the popularization and the practical application of the Korean language studies and to discuss their relation to language policy. First of all, this paper starts with a brief review of the precedent studies about the so-called crisis of the humanities in which the Korean language studies are included. And then, examining several types of the popularization and the practical application of the humanities to take a countermeasure of the crisis, this paper not only proposes transdisciplinary study and collective intelligence as a strategy of popularization but also argues for the necessity of the indirect application of the humanities to practical use. Finally, reviewing some attempt and possibility of the popularization and the practical application of the Korean language studies, this paper tries a discussion on their relation to some Korean language policy.

부부 간 호칭어 및 높임법 사용의 양성 불평등 측면

조태린(Cho Tae-rin) 한국사회언어학회 2011 사회언어학 Vol.19 No.1

The purpose of this paper is to examine the gender inequality of address terms and honorific usages in the conjugal relations and to evaluate the significance and the limits of some proposals on the improvement of related problems. First of all, this paper starts with a brief review of theoretical background such as linguistic approach, sociolinguistic approach, feministic approach, etc. Secondly, this paper makes an attempt at a comparative examination on five precedent researches and studies. And then, a survey of about 100 students of 3 university in Seoul was carried out for the purpose of comprehending their attitudes towards address terms and honorific usages in the conjugal relations. Finally, synthesizing and comparing the results of 5 precedent studies and our own survey, this paper analyzes the inequal side of address terms and honorific usages in the conjugal relations and looks at the symptom and possibility of change.

언어 규범과 언어 변이의 문제

조태린(Cho Tae-rin) 한국사회언어학회 2010 사회언어학 Vol.18 No.2

The purpose of this paper is to examine some issues concerning linguistic norms and language variations with special emphasis on the Standard of Korean Discourse(SKD). First of all, this paper starts with some theoretical and general considerations on linguistic norms and language variations, especially on their types, characteristics and correlation. Secondly, the establishing process, content and significance of the SKD as a linguistic norm are investigated. And then, some problems of language variation in the SKD are also examined through meticulous discussion about selection of linguistic variables, setting and subclassification of parameters, criteria for selection of normative form and so on. Finally, this paper presents a new possibility of the SKD as a rational and persuasive linguistic norm.

사회언어학의 기원에 대한 소고

조태린(Cho Tae-rin) 한국사회언어학회 2005 사회언어학 Vol.13 No.2

The purpose of this article is to examine the origins of the field of sociolinguistics by providing an overview of previous studies and a description of the current state of the field. Numerous studies have focused on investigating the origins of sociolinguistics and have attempted to trace the history back to the earliest time possible. However, if the necessary conditions for the formation of a full-fledged discipline are regarded (i.e., appearance of appellation, delineation of sub-fields, rapid increase in quantity of research, emergence of professional organizations and conferences, specialized academic journals, institutionalization in higher education, etc.), the beginnings of sociolinguistics can be regarded as the 1960s. As important as the history of the field is the underlying motivation. Sociolinguistics possessed, from the beginning, two main motivations: scientific motivation and practical motivation. Thus, only a discussion of origins combined with motivations can provide a holistic review of sociolinguistics as an academic field of study.

사회언어학의 지위와 의미에 대한 입장들

조태린(Cho Tae-rin) 한국사회언어학회 2006 사회언어학 Vol.14 No.1

  The purpose of this article is to examine the status and the signification of sociolinguistics by providing a comparative analysis of the various positions on this issue. Numerous positions have been distinguished too simply by denominations such as ‘OO sociolinguistics’ but have to be classified by criteria which show their essential difference (i.e., sphere of the object of study, relation with neighboring fields, autonomy as a field of science, epistemological viewpoint, consideration for the language user, viewpoint of the society, relation with real problems, etc.). After a brief examination of the logic, persuasiveness and limits of each position, this article clarifies its own position by offering a conceptual definition of sociolinguistics as a ‘study of the dynamic interaction between language, language user and social structure from a trans-disciplinary, hermeneutic and participatory point of view’. This discussion will contribute to elucidating the nature and the actual reality of sociolinguistics and exploring ideal ways toward its future development.

통일 시기 남북 전문용어 표준화 정책에 대한 소고

조태린(Cho Tae rin) 한국사회언어학회 2017 사회언어학 Vol.25 No.3

The Purpose of this paper is to draw a blueprint for the standardization policy of South Korean and North Korean terminology at the time of reunification of two Koreas. Firstly, this paper examines the necessity of South Korean and North Korean terminology standardization and seeks the future direction of standardization. Then, the objects, principles, system, and procedure of standardization enforcement are discussed, specifically focussing on the terms that are urgently standardized at the time of reunification, namely administrative terms(as public language and terminology) and educational terms(concluding vocabulary in subject and vocabulary of instruction). Finally, this paper concludes by proposing two supporting systems for the South Korean and North Korean terminology standardization. These two supporting systems, that is, the committee for terminology standardization and the on-line management system for terminology standardization, consider efficiency of policy and domain expertise.

대학교수 간 호칭어 사용 양상에 대한 사회언어학적 연구

조태린(Cho Tae-rin) 한국사회언어학회 2018 사회언어학 Vol.26 No.3

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the usage of address terms between professors in a Korean university upon the methodology of sociolinguistic variation studies. This study was conducted based on on-line questionnaire survey targeting 100 professors in an university situated in the metropolitan area. Address terms observed in this study are Gyosu(=professor)(+honorific ‘-nim), Seonsaeng(=teacher)(+’-nim’), Baksa(=doctor)(+‘-nim’), Saem/Ssaem(intimate abbreviation of Seonsaeng), etc. which are ordered by frequency. Factor groups considered in this study are addressor, addressee, and situation. The main results of this study are as in the following. (1) Addresser’s academic field, degree of intimacy relation with addressee, and addressee’s administrative position are main factors having influence on the usage of address terms between professors. (2) Addresser’s sex and age factors and addressee’s sex and academic field factors have little or no influence on the usage of address terms.