증권분석 전문가시스템에서 전향추론에 관한 설계

배상현,손영수 조선대학교 기초과학연구소 1993 自然科學硏究 Vol.16 No.1

The Expert system is a field of the artificial intellegence which enables the problem of a special territory to be solve by using model imitating an expert, that is, The Expert system is the computer system which infers a problem by using the knowledge base made up by means of inputting the knowledge of an expert. This paper designs the process of inference using forward chaining method, which to Pick up the knowledge data from knowledge base of stock analysis system.

고산(孤山) 이유장(李惟樟)의 예학사상

배상현 한국공자학회 2005 공자학 Vol.12 No.-

채원 오횡묵(吳宖黙)의 지역정치와 선정비(善政碑) 연구-경상도 고을을 중심으로-

배상현 영남대학교 민족문화연구소 2025 민족문화논총 Vol.90 No.-

Chaewon Oh Hoeng-muk (1834–1906) served as a local magistrate in Jain, Haman, and Goseong in Gyeongsang Province during the late nineteenth century. His daily record, Chongsoerok (Record of Comprehensive Affairs), written during his tenure, vividly illustrates both his close observation of local conditions and his persistent efforts to improve the lives of the residents. Between 1888 and 1894, the Gyeongsang region was repeatedly struck by natural disasters, leaving the population in an acutely impoverished state. The central government, however, lacked sufficient fiscal resources to provide adequate relief. In this context, Oh Hoeng-muk did not disregard the suffering of the people but instead sought to confront the crisis through cooperative governance between officials and commoners, the mobilization of local resources, and reforms in both the material and human structures of regional society. Jain, to which Oh was first appointed, was among the counties most severely affected by famine in Gyeongsang Province, while Haman and Goseong were both designated as nanchieup (“difficult-to-govern counties”). In Jain, he implemented kwŏnbun, a system of voluntary grain sharing, with great vigor. In Haman, he worked to suppress violent factional strife among the gentry, while actively engaging with the local intellectual class and mediating between competing social interests to resolve pressing issues. In Goseong, where overlapping tax burdens and heavy administrative demands created chronic instability, he devoted himself to famine relief but was ultimately forced to step down in the wake of civil disturbances. Around the time of his departure from office, Oh Hoeng-muk was honored by local residents through the erection of commemorative stelae. In Jain, the villagers of Il-eon-ri established the “Stele of Gratitude for Famine Relief and the Removal of Abuses”, which records that through his relief measures and elimination of entrenched abuses, scattered residents returned and local communities once again flourished. In Haman, the stele emphasizes his integrity and moral conduct, highlighting his care for the elderly and his relief activities for the poor. In Goseong, the “Stele Commemorating Oh Hoeng-muk’s Achievements at the Yeongnam Byulhyangsa” memorializes his contributions to the Yeongnam Byulhyangsa. These surviving monuments function not merely as commemorations of individual virtue but as markers of local politics, reflecting the aspirations and desires of the communities that erected them. The present study’s understanding of Oh Hoeng-muk’s regional administration and its commemoration necessarily remains limited, as it is based primarily on his diary and a small number of extant inscriptions. Future research will require the discovery of new local sources and comparative analysis, which may allow for a more comprehensive reassessment of his role in late nineteenth-century regional politics. 채원 오횡묵(1834~1906)은 19세기 말 경상도 자인, 함안, 고성에서 목민관으로 활동하였다. 그가 재임지에서 작성한 일록인 “총쇄록”에는 현장을 철저히 파악하면서 주민들의 삶을 개선하고자 한 그의 노력과 여정이 잘 드러나있다. 그가 활동하던 1888~1894년의 경상도 지역은 자연 재해 등으로 주민들의 삶이 극도로 피폐한 상황이었다. 그러나 국가 재정은 그들의 구제에 한계가 있는 실정이었다. 이러한 가운데 오횡묵은 주민들의 고통을 외면하지 않고관-민 협치를 통해 자체적인 재원 확보와 지역의 물적 인적 구조의 개혁을 통해 난관을 타개하려는 노력을 보여주었다. 오횡묵이 부임한 자인현은 경상도에서도 흉년이 가장 극심한 고을이었으며함안과 고성은 ‘難治邑’으로 지목되어 있었다. 그는 자인현에서 적극적인 勸分 을 실시하였으며, 함안에서는 향전을 잠재우고 지식인층과 적극 교류하며 계층이익을 담보하면서 현안을 해결해 나갔다. 고성에서는 행정 수요에 고전하면서 기민 구제에 진력하였으나 농민항쟁의 여파로 물러나게 되었다. 오횡묵은 이임을 전후해 선정비의 주인공이 되고 있었다. 자인에서는 日彦 里 주민들에 의해 세워졌다. 여기에는 기민의 구휼과 적폐들을 일소하여 흩어졌던 주민들이 돌아와 마을이 다시 번창하고 있다고 하였다. 함안 주민들에의해 세워진 비에는 노인 봉양과 빈민 구휼 활동이 잘 드러나 있다. 고성에세워진 비는 앞서 보인 그의 영남별향사 활동을 기념하는 것이었다. 이들 현전하는 비들 모두 주인공이 보인 지역정치의 표식으로서, 주민들의 바람과 욕구를 반영하는 기념물로 이해된다. 본고에서 살핀 오횡묵의 지역정치와 선정비에 대한 이해는 당사자가 남긴일기류와 소수의 현장 금석문을 중심 자료로 활용하였기 때문에 한계가 있다. 따라서 새로운 현장 자료의 발굴과 비교 분석을 통한 검토가 앞으로 요망된다.

신라 진흥왕, '망라사방(網羅四方)'의 리더십

배상현 신라대학교부설 신라리더십센터 2016 신라 리더십 연구 Vol.- No.9

禮와 小學에 對한 考究

裵相賢 동국대학교 경주대학 1985 論文集 Vol.4 No.-

지식베이스를 이용한 증권투자에 관한 퍼지 전문가 시스템

배상현 조선대학교 동력자원연구소 1992 動力資源硏究所誌 Vol.14 No.2

This paper presents the technique for making comprehensive evaluation of the effect of the introduction of the Fuzzy Expert Systems into the existing Knowledge Base of a test area to be studied on the Investment. In the proposed method, available system was operated from condition (Rule) and tool in the user interface, Fuzzy Knowledge Base, Database and then the effect on the configuration of the Fuzzy Expert System load was obtained. Overall evaluation with the inclusion of the utilization of the Fuzzy Expert System has been attempted.

沙溪 金長生의 禮學思想攷

裵相賢 東國大學校 1990 論文集 Vol.29 No.-

공제합의에 관한 검토 - 대법원 2024. 8. 1. 선고 2024다227699 판결에 대한 평석 -

배상현 경북대학교 법학연구원 2025 법학논고 Vol.- No.89

In past rulings, the distinctions among set-off, offset, and appropriation were not clearly drawn, and there was no specific judgment regarding the definition, requirements, or legal effects of set-off. However, the Supreme Court's en banc decision dated September 28, 2007 (2005Da15598) clarified that "set-off is distinct from offset , and the provisions on offset do not apply to set-off." Moreover, the Supreme Court decision of August 1, 2024 (2024Da227699, hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Decision”) provides a more detailed explanation of the requirements and effects of set-off compared to previous rulings. In this respect, the Subject Decision is a meaningful precedent. The main issues in the Subject Decision were as follows: where a buyer of an apartment unit received a bridge loan from a financial institution to fund the purchase, and subsequently lost the benefit of term due to a triggering event, causing the developer to acquire claims for subrogated payment and penalties – (i) whether the parties could agree to set off the buyer’s claim for the refund of the purchase price against the developer’s subrogated claim and penalty claim, and (ii) whether the point in time for the set-off should be deemed the moment the benefit of term was lost or the time of contract termination. The Court held that, under the principle of freedom of contract, the parties may freely agree on the requirements and effective date for set-off. While set-off by agreement, as in the Subject Decision, is in principle permissible, recognizing it without limitation could undermine transactional security and third-party trust. Therefore, even if such an agreement is made between the parties, unless there is a specific legal basis or a nexus between the claims, the parties cannot assert the set-off agreement against third parties. Meanwhile, the Court interpreted the “Confirmation Letter for Bridge Loan Application” (hereinafter referred to as the “Confirmation Letters”) and concluded that the reference point for the set-off between the developer’s subrogated claim and the buyer’s refund claim is the moment the benefit of term was lost. This conclusion appears valid based on a literal reading of Articles 1(4) and 2 of the Confirmation Letters. Although the Court did not explicitly address the timing for setting off the penalty claim, Article 2 of the Confirmation Letters does not specify the penalty claim as a subject of set-off. Therefore, the set-off of the penalty claim cannot be deemed to occur at the time of loss of benefit of term. In contrast, Article 2(4) of the Sales Contract stipulates that “upon cancellation or termination of the contract, the purchase price shall be applied in the order of penalty, late charges, etc.” Accordingly, the timing for the set-off of the penalty claim from the refund claim should be considered as the time of contract termination.

李太祖의 佛敎政策과 鄭道傳의 排佛論 : 心氣理篇을 中心으로

裵相賢 동국대학교 대학원 1977 大學院硏究論集-東國大學校 大學院 Vol.7 No.-

퇴계 이황선생의 예학사상 (禮學思想)

배상현 퇴계학연구원 1995 퇴계학보(退溪學報) Vol.85 No.1