http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : specificational copular clause (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
홍용철 한국생성문법학회 2017 생성문법연구 Vol.27 No.3
In Korean, kes, a [-animate] noun like thing, is known to be insensitive to animacy in kes cleft construction. On the other hand, kes cleft construction is a specificational copular clause; the suject kes clause introduces a variable, and the complement serves to provide a value for that variable. This squib claims (i) that kes in kes cleft construction functions as a variable requiring its value, (ii) that as a variable, its animacy feature is unspecified, and (iii) that its unspecified feature [animate] is compatible with predicates selecting [+animate]. So we can say that kes in kes cleft construction is actually sensitive to animacy contrary to its appearance. This apparent insensitivity takes place only in kes cleft construction because only this construction, which is a specificational clause, allows kes as a variable.
-
Korean reformulative multiple accusative construction as vacuous reformulative apposition
김옥기 경희대학교 언어정보연구소 2023 언어연구 Vol.40 No.2
This paper explores one type of Multiple Accusative Construction (MAC), namely “reformulative” MACs (previously referred to as “topic-type” MACs) (e.g., Mimi-ka kwail-ul sakwa-lul cohaha-n-ta), where the second accusative-marked NP (e.g., sakwa-lul) specifies a value for the variable introduced by the first accusative-marked NP (e.g., kwail-ul). In doing so, the paper first reviews two previous analyses: one proposed by Chae and Kim (2008) and the other by Kim (2006, 2010). Chae and Kim try to account for the formation of (reformulative-)MACs by appealing to a construction-specific rule (Recursive Rule) in the HPSG framework. Kim, on the other hand, takes the construction to be derived via PF-ellipsis in an underlying sentential structure. The previous analyses, however, encounter some empirical problems. This paper, therefore, offers an alternative perspective by treating reformulative MACs on a par with vacuous reformulative appositions in English (e.g., Kim likes fruit ─ likes apples) which are analyzed as involving coordinative syntax according to Griffiths (2015). Specifically, the paper proposes to analyze reformulative MACs as involving a coordinate VP structure created by overt across-the-board movement of a main verb. This coordination analysis, without positing any construction-specific rule or ellipsis, provides a streamlined way of accounting for general as well as idiosyncratic aspects of reformulative MACs.
스콜라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
