http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김용하(Yong-Ha Kim) 현대문법학회 2021 현대문법연구 Vol.112 No.-
In this paper, we try to deal with the mismatch between root and non-root clauses due the evidentiality marker –te- in Korean. As Kim (1981) claims, -te- plays the role of allowing the sentient to avoid his or her responsibility for the reported proposition. Whereas, as has been claimed by previous researchers, -te- is not the sentience head of the SenP. Rather, we assume that –te- is a modal affix selected by the sentience head with the retrospective feature. Thus, -te- does not directly interfere with the problematic mismatch between root and non-root clauses with respect to the person restrictions witnessed in –te- sentences. After all, our conclusion in this paper is that the mismatch between root and non-root clauses with respect to –te- is a phenomenon in which the sentient as an anaphor has different antecedent or controller in various syntactic contexts.
김용하 사단법인 한국언어학회 2023 언어학 Vol.- No.97
In this study, we deal with issues with so-called terminal-ending-fused endings in Korean, which consist of sentential terminal endings allegedly fused with other endings. Korean sentential terminal endings mark the illocutionary forces of sentences where they occur, which means that those endings complete (i.e. terminate) sentence-building. The fused endings at issue are very peculiar in that other endings are combined with those terminal endings without any intermediate verbal stems. Though the traditional view on these fused endings is that they result from the deletion of the stem of the utterance verb ha-, some works have recently suggested that they are fused endings produced via the process of grammaticalization. We will see in this study that this suggestion is very dangerous due to its violation of the grammatical system as we know, and that there is a possible way to account for the same phenomena in a more reasonable way.