Post-2012 기후변화체제와 한국의 협상전략

나성인 한국무역통상학회 2009 무역통상학회지 Vol.9 No.1

This paper examines Korea’s negotiation strategy in Post-2012 global climate regime beyond 2012. Negotiations for the future climate regime beyond 2012 started at COP11 and COP/MOP1, held in 2005. It is necessary to overcome various difficulties such as participation of the US and developing countries for GHG emissions reduction for midand long-term climate governance. This paper analyzed critical issues in international negotiation to form global climate regime beyond 2012 by analysing the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol. Korea has been treated as a non-Annex I country that is not assigned a quantified emission limitation; however, there is high expectation and pressure from international society to take on such a limitation, in consideration of the country’s economic growth. Mr. Ban Kimoon, newly appointed as Secretary General of the UN, may also compel the Korean government to take some action in this matter. This paper examines Korea’s negotiation strategies based on various indexes developed for proposals on future climate regime and.First, Korea is the world’s 10th largest GHG emissions country as of 2004, and has the 23rd largest cumulative GHG emissions from 1990 to 2000. Second, Korea has the world’s 30th highest per capita GDP in 2002, and was 24th in per capita CO2emissions,while it was 60th in per capita cumulative CO2 emissions from 1990 to 2000. Third, Korea’s HDI status was 32nd in 1990 with a rate of 0.814, improving to 28th in 2003 with a rate of 0.901. The socio-economic structure is quite similar to that of an industrialised country; thus, Korea’s responsibility toward the climate governance is high when we consider the series of indexes of GHG emissions. In conclusion, Korea government would not proactively take on the same level of obligations as developed countries, but would be likely to take on greater obligations than other developing countries. This paper examines Korea’s negotiation strategy in Post-2012 global climate regime beyond 2012. Negotiations for the future climate regime beyond 2012 started at COP11 and COP/MOP1, held in 2005. It is necessary to overcome various difficulties such as participation of the US and developing countries for GHG emissions reduction for midand long-term climate governance. This paper analyzed critical issues in international negotiation to form global climate regime beyond 2012 by analysing the UNFCCC and Kyoto Protocol. Korea has been treated as a non-Annex I country that is not assigned a quantified emission limitation; however, there is high expectation and pressure from international society to take on such a limitation, in consideration of the country’s economic growth. Mr. Ban Kimoon, newly appointed as Secretary General of the UN, may also compel the Korean government to take some action in this matter. This paper examines Korea’s negotiation strategies based on various indexes developed for proposals on future climate regime and.First, Korea is the world’s 10th largest GHG emissions country as of 2004, and has the 23rd largest cumulative GHG emissions from 1990 to 2000. Second, Korea has the world’s 30th highest per capita GDP in 2002, and was 24th in per capita CO2emissions,while it was 60th in per capita cumulative CO2 emissions from 1990 to 2000. Third, Korea’s HDI status was 32nd in 1990 with a rate of 0.814, improving to 28th in 2003 with a rate of 0.901. The socio-economic structure is quite similar to that of an industrialised country; thus, Korea’s responsibility toward the climate governance is high when we consider the series of indexes of GHG emissions. In conclusion, Korea government would not proactively take on the same level of obligations as developed countries, but would be likely to take on greater obligations than other developing countries.

2012 여수세계박람회의 성과와 과제

한병세 ( Byung Sae Han ) 한국도서(섬)학회 2014 韓國島嶼硏究 Vol.26 No.1

The 2012 Yeosu Expo was held from May 12th to Aug 12th for 93 days in Yeosu, Jeonnam. Its main theme was “The Living Ocean and Coast” -Diversity of Resources and Sustainable Activities. The purpose of Yeosu Expo was the recognize problems related to climate change, environment pollution, exhaustion of resource and destruction of eco system, and to seek its solutions. 104 countries and 10 international organizations including the UN participated in the Expo, and 8.2 million people came to visit. For host city, it was an opportunity to develope the local economy and improve city awareness, image, and transform its industry structure, while from the host country``s perspective it was a change to promote both itself and the world. Yeosu proved that a small city with only 300,000 citizens can hold a global event successfully. Its ambition to develop the local economy and transform its image from a city for fishery to a place for marine tourism and leisure has also been achieved. Yeosu also spread its name not only domestically, but also internationally. However, for this effect to continue longer than the 3 month exposition, a long term post-Expo plan is required. Currently the 2012 Yeosu Expo facilities are no longer as useful as they were 2 years ago, and there are no plans on how to appropriately use them. In this article, the general outline and purpose of the Expo is analyzed and evaluated. Also, four long-term strategies to make use of the Expo``s facilities are recommended so that the Expo infra can contribute to local and national development. It first begins with a post Expo plan which can consistently remember the theme of the Expo in the future. The article then moves on to how to publicize the plan so that it can contribute to local and national development. Thirdly, it suggests that this plan should include the “East-west unification area project”, the election pledges of President Park. Last of all the article recommends that both the Yeosu city and Jeonnam state should put up an effort to establish and practice this plan.

Housing Costs of Young College Graduate Renters in Capital Region Refl ected in the 2012 Korea Housing Survey

이현정 대한가정학회 2014 International Journal of Human Ecology Vol.15 No.2

This study examined housing costs and housing affordability of young college graduate renters in the CapitalRegion of Korea using microdata of the 2012 Korea Housing Survey (KHS). A licensed microdata set of 2012KHS was obtained on September 29, 2012 from the official KHS Website and analyzed statistically. I selected93,795 young college graduate renters between 20 and 29 years of age in the Capital Region and comparedtheir housing costs across income levels and tenure type. Major findings were as follows: (1) Jeon-se depositwas on average 3.1 times the annual household income and monthly renters’ deposit was 7.1 times themonthly household income; (2) households in higher income groups tended to pay a larger deposit and/ormonthly rent; however, households with a lower income were found to pay a greater proportion of incometo housing costs than households with a relatively higher income; (3) a total of 64% of all young collegegraduate renters had housing cost burdens to pay 30% or more of their income for housing, and more than78% of the low-income households were found burdened; and (4) after housing cost payments, low-incomehouseholds had less than one million KRW left to spend on other needs and savings; in addition, some low-tomid-income households had zero or even minus income left after housing cost payments.

Housing Costs of Young College Graduate Renters in Capital Region Reflected in the 2012 Korea Housing Survey

Lee, Hyun-Jeong The Korean Home Economics Association 2014 International Journal of Human Ecology Vol.15 No.2

This study examined housing costs and housing affordability of young college graduate renters in the Capital Region of Korea using microdata of the 2012 Korea Housing Survey (KHS). A licensed microdata set of 2012 KHS was obtained on September 29, 2012 from the official KHS Website and analyzed statistically. I selected 93,795 young college graduate renters between 20 and 29 years of age in the Capital Region and compared their housing costs across income levels and tenure type. Major findings were as follows: (1) Jeon-se deposit was on average 3.1 times the annual household income and monthly renters' deposit was 7.1 times the monthly household income; (2) households in higher income groups tended to pay a larger deposit and/or monthly rent; however, households with a lower income were found to pay a greater proportion of income to housing costs than households with a relatively higher income; (3) a total of 64% of all young college graduate renters had housing cost burdens to pay 30% or more of their income for housing, and more than 78% of the low-income households were found burdened; and (4) after housing cost payments, low-income households had less than one million KRW left to spend on other needs and savings; in addition, some low-to mid-income households had zero or even minus income left after housing cost payments.

Housing Costs of Young College Graduate Renters in Capital Region Refl ected in the 2012 Korea Housing Survey

( Hyun Jeong Lee ) 대한가정학회 2014 International Journal of Human Ecology Vol.15 No.2

This study examined housing costs and housing affordability of young college graduate renters in the Capital Region of Korea using microdata of the 2012 Korea Housing Survey (KHS). A licensed microdata set of 2012 KHS was obtained on September 29, 2012 from the official KHS Website and analyzed statistically. I selected 93,795 young college graduate renters between 20 and 29 years of age in the Capital Region and compared their housing costs across income levels and tenure type. Major findings were as follows: (1) Jeon-se deposit was on average 3.1 times the annual household income and monthly renters` deposit was 7.1 times the monthly household income; (2) households in higher income groups tended to pay a larger deposit and/or monthly rent; however, households with a lower income were found to pay a greater proportion of income to housing costs than households with a relatively higher income; (3) a total of 64% of all young college graduate renters had housing cost burdens to pay 30% or more of their income for housing, and more than 78% of the low-income households were found burdened; and (4) after housing cost payments, low-income households had less than one million KRW left to spend on other needs and savings; in addition, some low-to mid-income households had zero or even minus income left after housing cost payments.

포스트-2012 온실가스 감축 체제와 산업섹터제 논의

안윤기,진윤정 포스코경영연구원 2008 POSRI 경영경제연구 Vol.8 No.1

포스트-교토체제 논의 동향과 부문별 접근방식에 관한 연구

안윤기,진윤정 한국경영학회 2008 한국경영학회 통합학술발표논문집 Vol.2008 No.8

기후변화협상 체제에서 산업부문에 대한 부문별 접근방식(Sectoral Approach)의 평가 및 대응방향

한진현(Jin-Hyun Han),유동헌(Dongheon Yoo) 한국에너지학회 2009 에너지공학 Vol.18 No.4