2009 안보국방 환경 평가와 2010 안보여건 전망 : 이슈별 대응전략을 중심으로

박창권 (사) 한국전략문제연구소 2009 전략연구 Vol.- No.47

2009년 한국의 안보와 국방은 국제안보질서 구조의 변화, 북한 핵실험과 군사도발, 한미동맹의 발전과 변화, 지역 안보질서 구조의 유동성 증대, 비전통적 위협, 그리고 국방개혁 문제 등으로 인해 다양한 위협과 도전에 직면했었다. 무엇보다 북한의 핵실험은 한국의 안보적 불안정성을 증폭시켰을 뿐만 아니라 한국이 국제사회와 협력하여 이를 조속히 해결할 것을 요구하고 있다. 2010년 역시 한국의 안보와 국방은 북한 문제를 포함하여 다양한 안보적 도전과 위협에 직면할 것이며 이에 대한 적극적인 대응이 요구된다. 이슈별 주요 안보 여건을 살펴보면 다음과 같다. 국제안보질서 구조는 미국 오바마 정부의 협력중시의 정책과 중국의 부상으로 인해 새로운 변화의 모습을 띄고 있다. 미국은 과도한 군사개입, 경제침체, 핵확산 드의 문제를 국제적 협력을 통해 해결하고자 하고 있다. 특히, 미국은 중국의 위상을 인정하고 중국과의 관계를 새롭게 설정하고자 한다. 중국은 미국과 협력하면서도 자신의 위상과 영향력을 강화하여 미국 중심의 국제질서를 변화시키기 위해 노력하고 있다. 따라서 2010년 국제질서는 강대국간 경쟁 속에서도 협력적인 국제질서가 유지될 것으로 예상되며, 한국의 안보는 미중관계의 형태에 따라 보다 많은 영향을 받을 수 있다. 북한문제는 한국 및 국제사회에 대한 중요한 안보적 도전이다. 북한은 핵실험과 군사적 도발을 실시하여 한국 안보를 위협하고 있으며, 국제사회는 안보리 결의를 통해 대북제재를 실시하고 있다. 북한은 대북제재를 무력화하기 위해 평화공세와 한국의 안보를 인질로 위협 전술을 적극 전개하고 있다. 북한의 이러한 양면전술은 * 이 논문은 2009년 10월 KRIS 정책토론회에서 발표한 발제논문으로 최근 상황을 분석 보완한 것임 핵문제 해결을 위한 협상이 본격 추진될 2010년에 보다 강화될 것으로 예상된다. 이는 한국 내 여론을 분열시키고 대북정책과 전략에 대한 국제적 공조체제를 약화시킬 수 있다. 한국은 북한의 위협과 도전에 대해 원칙에 기반을 둔 정책을 추진하되 북한의 변화를 촉진시킬 수 있는 전략적 개입전략을 강구할 필요가 있다. 한미동맹은 양국의 안보적 요구를 고려하여 새로운 발전을 위한 제도적 장치를 마련하고 있다. 2009년 한미는 미래 동맹비전을 선포하였을 뿐만 아니라 북한 핵위협을 억제하고 전시작전통제권 전환을 준비하기 위한 협력방안을 합의하였다. 반면에 북한은 한국이 아프간에 대한 지원을 요구하고 있다. 2010년 한미 양국은 북한 비핵화를 위한 공고한 협력체제를 유지하고, 양국의 현안인 FTA를 체결하며 전시작전통제권 전환을 준비해야 할 것이다. 또한 한국은 아프간에 대한 군사적 지원 방안을 적극 강구해야 할 것이다. 세계적 경제침제와 중국의 부상은 지역 국가간 양자 및 다자간 협력의 중요성을 제기하고 있다. 비록 안보분야의 협력은 매우 제한적이지만 경제, 사회적 협력을 위한 방안이 2009년 적극 추진되었다. 이러한 협력의 움직임은 2010년에도 지속될 것이며, 국가간 안보관계의 발전을 위한 매개체로 작용할 수 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 지역내 군비경쟁은 지속되고 있으며, 잠재적 분쟁요인은 상호간 관계 발전을 제한하는 요인으로 여전히 작용할 것이다. 비전통적 위협은 한국의 안보에 새로운 위협으로 중요성이 커지고 있으며, 국가간 협력을 통한 대응이 중요해지 ... In 2009, Korea faced various threats and challenges to its national security and defense, such as the changes in the structure of the international security order, North Korea's nuclear experiments and military provocations, the new development of the Korea-US alliance, changes in the East Asia security order, increasing non-traditional threats, and adjustment of the defense reform plan. Especially, the North's nuclear tests have caused great uncertainties in Korea's security and demands that Korea and the international community work together to resolve the problem. In 2010, Korea will also face very unstable situations to its defense, including the North Korea problem, which will require a proactive response. This paper analyzes the major issues for the security and defense as follows. The international security structure is changing due to the Obama administration's emphasis on cooperative diplomacy and the rise of China. Through international cooperation, the US is trying to solve its problems in excessive overseas military involvement, economic recession, and nuclear proliferation. The US acknowledges the status of China as a global power and tries to establish a new relationship. China, on the other hand, cooperates with the US while at the same time attempts to change the US-centric global order. Therefore in 2010, cooperation is expected between the world powers despite the underlying competition. Korea's security will be increasingly affected by the US-China relations. The North Korean problem is the most important challenge for South Korea and the global community. North Korea has threatened the South by nuclear experiments and military provocations. The global community is responding by placing sanctions on the North through the security council resolution. The North seeks to render these sanctions useless by using a peace offensive and exploiting South Korea's security as hostage. This double-edged strategy is expected to strengthen in 2010 as the negotiations to resolve the nuclear issue begin. This can split the public opinion causing political problems in South Korea and also weaken its global cooperation. South Korea needs to put in place policies based on firm principles while deliberating to take strategic intervention that will accelerate changes in the North. The Korea-US is developing new alliance relations in regard to their new security demands. In 2009, Korea and the US declared the future-oriented new alliance vision which expands the role of Korea beyond the peninsula, while also agreeing to cooperate on the issues of the North Korean nuclear threat and the transition of wartime operational control. The US explicitly expressed that Korea needs to make more contributions for Afghanistan. In 2010, both countries should cooperate for the de-nuclearization of the North, sign the FTA agreements and prepare for the transition of wartime operational control. Korea should also find proper ways to support Afghanistan. The global economic recession and the rise of China sets forth the importance of bilateral and multilateral cooperation in the region. Cooperation in the area of defense has been very limited, but economic and social cooperation has been strongly pursued. This trend is expected to continue in 2010, which could act as a catalyst for development in security cooperation. However, the continuing regional arms race, and the potential for conflicts will still act as a limiting factor for such developments. Non-traditional threats to the Korea's security has been growing in importance and the response through global cooperation has also become important. In 2009, though Korea faced threats from Somali pirates, cyber attacks, and the swine flu, it has responded effectively. Globally there were many humanitarian disasters due to earthquakes and tsunamis. In 2010, these non-traditional threats are expected to continue and Korea will have to respond proactively with global cooperation. Kor...

비전통 안보위협의 부상과 한미일 안보협력 방안

설인효 한일군사문화학회 2021 한일군사문화연구 Vol.31 No.-

COVID19 has become an event that clearly reveals the importance of nontraditional security threats in national security. Today, a number of nontraditional security threats, including the spread of infectious diseases, are largely due to the globalized international order, which has expanded its scale and deadly nature. Therefore, it will be difficult to restore the globalized world, which is a source of international prosperity and stable relationship among states, if effective systems to respond to non-traditional security threats are not established. However, international cooperation, which is the core of an effective response, is likely to be constrained, as the COVID19 is expected to amplify competitive international relations, including the U.S.-China strategic competition that has been already underway. From now on, the military should be reborn as a competent defense with expertise in responding to non-traditional security threats in order to protect itself from the threats such as large-scale infectious diseases and maintain wartime preparedness even in those threats. Furthermore, the role of leading defense cooperation in responding to non-traditional security threats will be an important foundation for restoring international cooperation and globalized international order in the post-Corona era. The military, which has the ability to quickly transport personnel, equipment and supplies, can play a unique and critical role in promoting international defense cooperation. Through the establishment of an efficient defense cooperation system, it is possible to respond quickly and effectively to a crisis in a country so that the spread of the crisis can be effectively blocked. Meanwhile, it is hard to rule out the possibility of such a post-COVID19 crisis further amplifying on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia, where U.S.-China competition is escalating and negotiations on North Korea’s nuclear weapons program remain stalled. By actively pushing for security cooperation among South Korea, the U.S. and Japan to respond to non-traditional security threats, South Korea should take the lead in international cooperation that is essential in the post-Corona phase, while actively creating favorable strategic conditions to avoid falling into a bilateral selective situation between the U.S. and China. Efforts to establish an effective defense cooperation system against non-traditional security threats can not only be resisted by China, but also gain support from the international community, as well as enhance interoperability in carrying out operations. Defense cooperation in responding to non-traditional security threats could serve as an opportunity for South Korea and Japan to pursue security cooperation by separating historical and security issues. It is hard to expect the history issue to be resolved in a short period of time, but if Korea and Japan gradually expand defense cooperation to cope with non-traditional security threats such as responding to infectious diseases, it will serve as an important foundation for security cooperation among three countries to enhance regional stability in the long run. 코로나19는 국가안보에 있어서 비전통 안보위협의 중요성을 여실히 드러내는 사건이 되었다. 오늘날 감염병의 확산을 비롯한 다수의 비전통 안보위협은 세계화된 국제질서로 인해 그 규모와 치명성이 크게 확대되고 있다. 따라서 비전통 안보위협에 대한 효과적인 대응체제를 수립하지 못할 경우 국제적 번영과 안정적 질서의 원천이 되는 셰계화된 국제질서를 복원하기 어려울 것이다. 그러나 코로나19는 이미 진행되고 있던 미중경쟁을 포함한 경쟁적 국제관계를 악화시키는 역할을 할 것으로 예상되어 국제협력은 위축되고 제약될 가능성이 크다. 이러한 상황에서 비전통 안보위협에 대한 효과적 대응 지원과 국제적 국방협력을 주도해 나갈 군과 국방의 역할 확대가 주목된다. 향후 군은 대규모 감염병과 같은 비전통 안보위협으로부터 군 자체를 보호하고 이를 통해 전시대비태세를 유지하기 위해서도, 정부와 민간을 지원하여 조기에 위기에 대응할 수 있도록 하기 위해서도 비전통 안보위협에 대한 전문적 대응역량을 갖춘 유능한 국방으로 거듭나야 한다. 나아가 비전통 안보위협 대응을 위한 국방협력을 선도하는 역할은 포스트 코로나 국면에서 국제협력을 복원하고 세계화된 국제질서를 회복하는 중요한 기반이 될 것이다. 인력과 장비, 물자를 신속하게 수송할 수 있는 능력을 가진 군은 국제적 국방협력 증진에 있어서 독보적인 역할을 수행할 수 있다. 효율적 국방협력체계 구축을 통해 한 국가에서 발생한 위기에 신속하고 효과적으로 대응할 수 있어야 위기의 확산을 효과적으로 봉쇄할 수 있다. 한편 이와 같은 코로나19 이후의 위기는 미중경쟁이 더욱 고조되고 북핵 협상이 교착상태에 머물고 있는 한반도와 동북아에서 더 증폭된 모습으로 전개될 가능성을 배제하기 어렵다. 한국은 비전통 안보위협 대응을 위한 한미일 안보협력을 적극적으로 추진해 나감으로서 포스트 코로나 국면에서 반드시 필요한 국제협력을 주도해 나감과 동시에 미국과 중국 사이에서 양자택일적 상황에 빠지지 않기 위한 유리한 전략적 여건을 적극적으로 조성해 나가야 한다. 비전통 안보위협에 대한 효과적 국방협력 체계를 구축하는 노력은 중국도 거부할 수 없고 국제사회의 지지를 얻을 수 있을 뿐 아니라 작전 수행 시 상호 운용성 증진을 통해 미래의 위기에 공동으로 대응할 수 있는 역량도 증진시킬 수 있다. 비전통 안보위협 대응을 위한 국방협력은 한국과 일본이 역사 문제와 안보 문제를 분리하여 안보협력을 추진해 나갈 수 있는 중요한 계기가 될 수도 있다. 한일 간 역사 문제가 단기간 내에 해결되기를 기대하기 어렵지만 당면한 과제인 감염병 대응 등 비전통 안보위협 대응을 위한 국방협력을 다양한 수준과 분야에서 시작하여 점진적으로 확대해 나간다면 지역 안정에 기여할 수 있는 한미일 안보협력의 중요한 기반으로 작용할 수 있을 것이다.

다자 안보협력 체제의 이해 : 집단안보, 공동안보, 협력안보의 개념과 현실

신범식(Beom-Shik Shin) 고려대학교 일민국제관계연구원 2010 국제관계연구 Vol.15 No.1

안보연구에서뿐만 아니라 국제정치학 전반에서 대단히 자주 언급되는 중요성을 가지면서도 그 개념에 대한 합의된 이해의 기반이 비교적 약한 것으로 집단안보(collective security), 공동안보(common security), 협력안보(cooperative security) 등이 있다. 그런데 이러한 개념들을 비교적 관점에서 설명하고 분석하며, 그 현실적 의미를 추적하는 연구가 의외로 많지 않다. 본고는 이들 집단안보, 공동안보, 협력안보의 개념을 현재적 상황에서 재구성하고, 다양한 다자안보레짐의 현실 가운데 이 개념들이 어떻게 적용되었는가를 살펴보았다. 특히 집단안보, 공동안보, 협력안보에 대한 21세기적 상황에서의 개념적 이해와 이러한 개념이 적용된 안보협력체제로서 NATO, CSCE/OSCE, ARF, SCO 등의 안보협력레짐을 이들 안보개념과 연관하여 분석함으로써 21세기적 안보의 복합화(hybridization) 특성을 밝히고 있다. 지금까지 다자안보체제와 관련된 다양한 안보개념이 국제정치 환경의 변화와 관련하여 등장하여 왔지만, 그것을 실현하는 구체적인 안보협력레짐은 다양한 안보개념의 지향을 지역별 · 시기별 필요에 따라 원용하면서 복합적인 체제를 구축하여 왔으며, 이러한 안보개념의 복합화는 앞으로 더 강화될 것으로 보인다. 이러한 연구는 최근 논의되고 있는 한반도평화체제나 동북아 및 아시아 다자안보체제의 수립을 위한 다양한 연구들을 검토하고 새로운 연구들을 촉진하는 데 유용한 수단을 제공할 수 있을 것이다. States can enhance their security through cooperation with other states instead of obtaining the balance of power by means of self-help or alliances. Despite its importance within international political studies, as well as in security studies, agreements in understanding the concepts of collective security, common security, and cooperative security have been relatively weak. Yet surprisingly, there exist few studies which analyze these concepts and trace their actual implications in comparative perspectives. This paper examines the meanings of collective security, common security, and cooperative security from a viewpoint of the international conditions in the 21st century, and explores their application within various multilateral security regimes such as NATO, CSCE/OSCE, ARF, SCO in comparative perspective. This research also reveals the hybridization characteristics of the present international security practice of these institutions. These multilateral security organizations reflect various combinations of these three concepts of security, establishing multifaceted systems according to time changes and regional conditions. The tendency toward hybridization of these security concepts seems likely to be strengthened in the near future.

동아시아 지역안보협력의 모색: 인간안보 패러다임을 중심으로

오영달 ( Young Dahl Oh ) 아시아.유럽미래학회 2010 유라시아연구 Vol.7 No.2

Scholars of International Relations has been regarding wars, i.e., military conflicts, as the most important task in running political community for long time. This traditional view of security was based on the assumption that protecting the people from the enemy``s armed attack was bound to lead to the protection of individual citizens`` safety. Nevertheless, it is an undeniable trend that states are pursuing supranational cooperation in the field of security and economics due to the rapid advancement of regionalism and globalization. However, this trend is remarkably absent in East Asia including Republic of Korea, China, and Japan. Of course, While it is a fact that East Asia has the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(ASEAN) established in 1967 and ASEAN Regional Forum for regional security purpose, these are insufficient in terms of institutionalization and substance. Thus, it is necessary for the countries in this region to discuss and seek regional security cooperation. The current picture of the East Asia shows a dual trait of its geopolitics, i.e., actively engaging in intra-regional economic exchanges on the one hand, and vigorously involved in armed race on the other hand. In this sense, the realists`` typical contention that cooperation in the field of security is very rare seems to be compelling in the setting of East Asia. In general, traditional military cooperation is very difficult to achieve in international relations when mutual trust is not sufficiently formulated because the short-term costs of betrayal is bigger than the long-term costs of cooperation. Mutual trust can be better advanced among countries of liberal democracy, and this implies that international security cooperation should be preceded by liberal democracy. It is quite probable to states to face security dilemma when individual states deal with their security affairs separately. This means that supranational institutionalization of security cooperation is crucial in overcoming the security dilemma. From the above understanding, this article approaches the security cooperation from the perspective of human security as well as traditional military security. For this purpose, it also discusses the differentiated position on security cooperation among realism, liberalism, and constructivism of International Relations. While the traditional security discourse tends to focus on state actors as the points of reference, the nontraditional human security paradigm sees individual human beings as the point of reference in addressing the question of security. In addition, the human security paradigm comprises a more concrete content of freedom from fear and freedom from want as its main content and this is the key content of liberal democratic political system as well. Therefore, the human security paradigm is a normative approach to the security concept in that it seeks to guarantee people freedom from a variety of sources of fear and want on the domestic and international level. It is true that this approach is criticized by some scholars because it deals with too comprehensive a scope of issueareas and tends to lack a intellectual consistency and to weaken analytical function as well. However, this article argues that this problem could be attenuated by giving priority to freedom from fear rather than freedom from want. In other words, when people are guaranteed their freedom from fear, they can enjoy the freedom from want as well because people have a better life environment in which they can fulfill their creativity. This means that people can enjoy civil and political rights under the liberal democracy. From this viewpoint, it is noteworthy that there exist a mixture of countries with liberal democracy and authoritarian and dictatorial rule. The authoritarian and dictatorial regimes tend to shun the traditional security cooperation, let alone the human security one. China is a good example of authoritarian regime while both Republic of Korea and Japan are examples of liberal democracy. This means that it will be a long way to reach the goal of human security cooperation regime in East Asia including Northeast Asia. In this situation, it is necessary to start with like-minded countries which are willing to join the grouping of regional human security cooperation. In addition, it will be also wise to start from the mutually agreeable area of human security area and extend to other ones. After all, East Asia is going to need to have a regional human rights protection regime such as European Convention on Human Rights and its related bodies. On the basis of this human security cooperation, it will be possible for East Asian countries to achieve nontraditional security cooperation and institutionalization and to contribute to the peace of the world.

Establishment of MILITARY Cooperative System for Disaster Relief in Northeast Asia

Hongje Cho,Sangjung Park J-INSTITUTE 2021 International Journal of Terrorism & National Secu Vol.6 No.2

Purpose: This study aims to establish international systems and cooperative relations for disaster relief, one of the non-traditional security threats, to strengthen security cooperation in Northeast Asia, and to expand and strengthen them to traditional concepts of security threats, thereby contributing to the stability and prosperity of Northeast Asia. Method: This study applies functional approach of regional security cooperation. It covers empirical case study to strengthen regional security cooperation and contribute to peace, stability and prosperity in the region through national and transnational cooperation such as state actors, non-state actors, NGOs(Non-government Organization), and so on. Results: Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief(HA/DR) issue, one of the non-traditional security threats, has been emerged as new security issues. Therefore, Republic of Korea(ROK) military needs to establish various measures and the role of disaster relief for international cooperation. Korea should also recognize the importance of these problems and study ways to mitigate them. Conclusion: HA/DR is on the human security agenda as one of the non-traditional security threats and is a growing international security issue. Nowadays, HA/DR extends the traditional concept of security threats. In conclusion, the ROK military should play a key role in strengthening security cooperation in Northeast Asia. The active participation of the ROK military will contribute to the stability and prosperity of Northeast Asia.

한일 파트너십 공동선언과 한일 안보협력

이기태 연세대학교 동서문제연구원 2019 동서연구 Vol.31 No.4

The Kim Dae-Jung government’s policy towards Japan, inaugurated in 1998, reflected collectively his perception of Japan, and changes both in the political situation on the Korean peninsula triggered by North Korea’s nuclear crisis and in U.S. security policy towards Northeast Asia after the Cold War. In a situation where security cooperation with Japan was difficult because of strong resentment, the North’s threat made security-related decision-makers and experts feel the urgent need for security cooperation between South korea and Japan. Since the inauguration of Kim Dae-Jung, he has sought security cooperation between Korea and Japan from a strategic perspective to cover security cooperation in the Joint Declaration of a New Korea-Japan Partnership for the 21st Century. The key features for security cooperation in the partnership are ‘trust-building’ between Korea and Japan and the ‘institutionalization’ of bilateral cooperation based on trust. Considering Korea’s resentment towards Japan and the constraints of Japan’s pacifist Constitution, it is worthwhile that the partnership has been focused on the practically applicable fields of multilateralism, non-traditional security and international cooperation. The Korean government should pursue security cooperation with Japan while upholding the partnership as follows. First, it is necessary to build trust and institutionalize for security cooperation between Korea and Japan. Second, multilateral security cooperation should be pursued. Third, international cooperation such as non-traditional security should be focused on. 1998년 성립된 김대중 정부의 새로운 대일 정책은 김대중 대통령 자신의 대일 인식과 북한 핵위기로 촉발된 한반도 정세의 변화, 그리고 탈냉전 이후 미국의 동북아 안보정책의 변화가 종합적으로 반영된 결과물이다. 특히 탈냉전 이후에도 국민 감정상 일본과의 안보협력이 어려웠던 상황에서 북한 위협은 한일 양국의 안보 관련 정책결정자 및 전문가들에게 한일 안보협력의 필요성을 느끼게 만들었다. 1998년 김대중 정부 출범 이후 한일 안보협력의 필요성을 전략적인 관점에서 바라보고 있던 김대중 대통령은 ‘한일 파트너십 공동선언’에 한일 안보협력 분야를 포함시켰다. 한일 파트너십 공동선언에서 안보협력 분야에서 나타난 가장 큰 특징은 한일 간 안보협력을 위한 ‘신뢰’ 구축과 이에 기반한 한일 협력의 ‘제도화’ 추구였다. 또한 한일 간 안보분야에서의 다자주의와 비전통 안보, 국제협력은 한일 양국 간에 한국의 대일 감정과 일본의 평화헌법이라는 국내제약 요인을 감안하여 실질적으로 진행 가능한 분야를 선택했다는 점에서 의의를 찾을 수 있다. 향후 한국의 대일 안보 협력은 ‘한일 파트너십 공동선언’의 정신을 계승하면서 다음과 같은 방향으로 진행되어야 한다. 첫째, 한일 안보협력의 신뢰 구축과 제도화가 필요하다. 둘째, 다자주의 안보 협력을 추구해야 한다. 셋째, 비전통 안보 분야 등 국제협력에 중점을 둬야 한다.

민간경비와 경찰의 상호협력에 미치는 영향요인 분석

최홍만(Choi, Hong-Man),장철영(Jang, Cheol-Yeung),박동균(Park, Dong-Gyun) 한국민간경비학회 2019 한국민간경비학회보 Vol.18 No.2

사회 기능의 다변화로 각종 범죄가 날로 증가하는 시점에 이 문제를 경찰 공권력만으로 대응하기에는 이미 한계가 이르렀다. 따라서 이러 한 현안문제들을 보완하기 위해서는 민간경비와의 협력 방안이 절실히 요구된다. 경찰과 민간경비의 전통이 오래된 선진국들도 이미 상호간 협력을 통해 많은 치안위험 요인과 범죄문제를 해결하고 있다는 점은 시사하는 바가 크다. 이에 본 연구에서도 민간경비와 경찰 간의 상호협력을 통한 치안 공백 문제를 해결할 수 있다는 논거 하에 상호협력 증진을 위한 요인으로 여섯 가지(상호인식, 업무정보교환, 공유매뉴얼, 법·제도, 교육훈련시스템, 협동방문활동)를 제시하였고, 이들 요인 중 어떠한 요인이 상호협력증진에 강한 영향관계를 미치는지 확인하기 위해 다중회귀 분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 공유 매뉴얼 (β=.421)이 가장 큰 영향정도를 보였으며, 그 다음으로 업무정보교환(β=.345), 교육훈련시스템 (β=.301), 상호인 식(β=.216), 협동방문활동(β=.123), 법·제도(β=.117) 순으로 조사되었다. 분석결과를 근간으로 다음과 같은 정책적 함의를 모색하였다. 첫째, 민간경비와 경찰 간의 상호인식 전환을 기반으로 상호 불신을 제거하고, 신뢰와 존중을 통한 협력이 필요하다. 둘째, 업무정보교환을 통해 범죄 예방을 위한 협력방안 구축이 이루어져야 한다. 셋째, 공유매뉴얼 개발을 통해 정책적 장치마련과 양자 실무자 간의 책임자 간담회 개최를 통한 공유매뉴얼 협의를 강구하여야 한다. 넷째, 법·제도에서는 ‘경비업법’과 ‘청원경찰법’의 양분화에 의한 비효율적인 운영과 민간경비 전담기구 설치를 기해야 한다. 다섯째, 교육훈련시스템 강화를 통한 민간경비의 업무수행 능력 향상을 토대로 경찰과의 협력활동이 가능하도록 교육의 내실화가 모색되어야 한다. 마지막으로 민간경비와 경찰의 합동방문활동을 통한 범죄 예방과 지도계몽이 강화되어야 한다. 결론적으로, 민간경비와 경찰 간의 협력체제 구축을 통한 범죄예방과 치안역량 강화, 국민의 치안서비스 질 제고를 위한 노력이 이루어져야 한다. At the time when crimes are increasing day by day due to the diversification of social functions, limitations have already reached to cope with these problems with police force. Therefore, in order to overcome these pending problems, cooperation with private security is urgently required. It is suggested that developed countries with long traditions of police and private security have already solved many security risks and crime problems through mutual cooperation. In this study, six factors(mutual recognition, work information exchange, sharing manual, law and system, education and training system, joint visit activity) were selected as independent variables for the activation of the private security and police cooperation system. And this study analyze the effects on the promotion of mutual cooperation between private security and police, and to find ways to promote cooperation. As a result of multiple regression analysis, the independent variable that had the greatest influence on the dependent variable of cooperation was the sharing manual(β=.421) with the highest β value, followed by work information exchange(β=.345), education and training system(β=.301), mutual recognition(β=.216), joint visit activity(β=.123), and law and system(β =.117). Based on the analysis results, the following policy implications were sought. Through these analysis results, first, it is necessary to remove mutual distrust based on the mutual recognition change between the private security and the police, and to cooperate through trust and respect. Second, cooperation for prevention of crime should be established through work information exchange. Third, through the development of the sharing manual, the policy manual should be set up and the sharing manual should be discussed through the meeting of the responsible person. Fourth, in the law and system, inefficient operation by the division of the ‘Security Industry Business Act’ and the ‘Police Assigned for Special Guard Act’ and the establishment of the private security task force should be expected. Fifth, improvement of education should be sought to enable cooperative activities with police on the basis of improving the performance of private security through strengthening of education and training system. Finally, crime prevention and guidance enlightenment should be strengthened through the joint visits by private security and police. In conclusion, efforts should be made to improve crime prevention, security capacity, and quality of public service by establishing cooperation system between private security and police.

Mutual Cooperation between USA Police and Private Security : Actual Status and Meaning

Park, Dong-Kyun,Kim, Tae-Min 한국경호경비학회 2011 시큐리티연구 Vol.- No.28

범죄가 다양화 되어가는 치안환경 변화에 적절하게 대응하기 위해서는 경찰과 민간경비의 상호협력 시스템이 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 시큐리티산업 선진국인 미국의 경찰과 민간경비 간 긴밀한 상호협력 시스템 실태분석을 통한 의미를 찾아보고, 나아가 경찰의 치안 서비스의 질을 향상시키고 건전한 민간경비산업 선진화 방안을 논의하고자 하였다. 미국 경찰과 민간경비의 상호협력 사례를 종합적으로 살펴볼 때, 가장 의미 있는 특징은 경찰과 민간경비가 서로의 존재에 대한 긍정적 인식을 바탕으로 실질적인 협력방안에 대한 논의들이 이루어지고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이는 양자의 상호관계가 사회 안전망을 이루는 주체성을 가지고 시민의 안전욕구를 충족시키는 동반자 관계라는 기본인식이 자리하고 있다는 것이다. 이 연구에서 시사하는 바는 미국에서는 다양한 경찰과 민간경비의 상호협력 프로그램, 지방자치단체들의 노력, 민간경비의 높은 질적 수준 및 시민들로부터의 신뢰도, 경찰과 민간경비 뿐만 아니라 시민들의 범죄문제 해결에 대한 전반적인 이해와 같은 많은 요인들에 의하여 사회 안전 활동이 효과를 발휘하고 있다는 사실이다. 따라서 우리나라에서도 선진국의 상호협력 시스템들을 정책적으로 참고하여 치안정책에 반영하고 국민에 대한 치안 서비스의 질 향상과 민간경비산업의 선진화를 위한 노력을 경주해야 할 것이다. 또한 미국 사례에서 보는 것과 같이 경찰과 민간경비의 상호협력은 주로 자치경찰 수준에서 이루어지고 있음을 감안할 때, 보다 나은 주민밀착형 치안서비스 제공을 위하여 우리나라에서도 자치경찰제도가 본격적으로 시행되어야 할 것이다. In the situation that crime is diversified qualitatively and quantitatively, the mutual cooperation system between police and private security is very important to cope with the change of policing environment properly. The primary purpose of this study is to suggest the method to improve the policing service quality of police and advance sound security industry by analyzing the case of close mutual cooperation system between police and private security of USA, which can be called the best country in the field of private security. When considering the cases of USA synthetically, we can know that as the most basic characteristic, the discussion over actual cooperation method is performed on the basis of positive recognition over mutual existence of police or private security. It means that the mutual relationship is based on the basic recognition over partner relationship to meet citizen's desire for safety. While reviewing the cases of USA, Korea shall refer to the fact that social safety activities of advanced countries display effects because of many factors such as various mutual cooperation programs between police and private security, efforts of local government, high quality of private security, reliance of citizen and general understanding of police, private security and citizen to solve crime problem. As shown in the review of USA cases, when considering the fact that the mutual cooperation between police and private security is performed in the level of autonomous police, Korea shall perform autonomous police system to provide better policing service, which is close to citizen.

한국의 국제관계와 국가안보전략 방향

김재홍 ( Jae Hong Kim ) 한국군사학회 2012 군사논단 Vol.71 No.-

There saying “Sajabulgaboksaeng(死者不可以復生)” being ``A dead never return to life`` and ``Manggukbulgaibokjon(亡國不可以復存)`` being ``A perished nation shall never return to exist`` It is as much important to guarantee the territorial sovereignty & the people of the nation as to keep save one`s own life of individual. The National Security Strategy to guarantee National Security needs to be changed actively to the favorable direction in accordance with the change of security environment. The National Security Strategy should be applied differently according to the paradigm of international relations. It may be regarded the Absolute Security approach is effective as being a national security strategy under the realist international relations paradigm, however, under the international relations` paradigm of liberalism and idealism, it is regarded to be effective the Common & Corporative security approach as being a national security strategy. With regard to security environment which affects Korea`s national security, the paradigm of international relations surrounding Korean peninsula as well as global international relations have changed significantly. Korea indicates dual postures as it proceeds realist international relations that balances polaristic powers, at the same time maintains idealistic international relations that relies exchanges & cooperation partially on the basis of interdependence. Besides, with regard to global international relation, it indicates idealistic paradigm based on the authority & function of UN even thought it appears to be weak. In view of above, the 21 century National Security strategy of Korea should be guided by the mixed strategy that applies both absolute security approach and common & cooperative security. In other word, Korea should be able to use National Security Strategy that produces maximum national security effect through convergence of international regime activities organized by security related nations such as USA, Japan, China, Russia in addition to Korea-US military alliance system and South-North exchange & cooperation, for which it must be able to demonstrate the ability of genius in the field of diplomatic and security strategy.

A New Option for Development of Human Security in East Asia: Reforming the ASEAN Regional Forum

이상수 사단법인 한국평화연구학회 2011 평화학연구 Vol.12 No.2

This paper argues that a reformed ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) can promote human security in East Asia. The promotion of ARF-centered human security requires a definition that accords with the respective cultures and values of its member states. The sources of human insecurity that plague the region include: the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), terrorism, traffickingin illicit drugs, persons, and arms, North Korean ‘famine refugees,’ health insecurity, HIV/epidemics, , various forms of economic crime, environmental insecurity, domestic threats, political insecurity, ethnopolitical conflict, poverty and economic inequity, food security, acid rain, and yellow dust. Human security issues can be addressed in the ARF by three phases. First, Establishing atmosphere: Creating norms for human security in East Asia, and Establishing a human security academy or research center. Second, promoting cooperation: Establishing an independent secretariat at ARF, creating a human security promotion center under the secretariat, raising funds for human security, cultivating human security culture through education. Third, Full-scale cooperation: Spreading shared values for human security and mobilizing all-out support for human security from member states are prerequisite to promoting human security in East Asia.Even though ARF member states have different ideas and interpretations of human security, their enhanced cooperation and openness may improve the human security situation in East Asian region