셰익스피어 4대 비극과 배신

강석주(Seok Joo Kang) 한국셰익스피어학회 2024 셰익스피어 비평 Vol.60 No.1

Shakespeare’s four great tragedies are full of betrayal, which is the main reason that results in the protagonist’s tragic downfall. Shakespeare seems to believe that the most painful and unfortunate suffering comes from the betrayal of close people such as family members, lovers, friends, and loyal subjects etc. Betrayal of brother and wife in Hamlet, betrayal of right-hand man in Othello, betrayal of a loyal subject and kindred in Macbeth, and betrayal of daughters in King Lear are the common cause of tragic conflict and suffering. It seems to reflect the tendency of Renaissance society in which deception and betrayal were considered necessary for individual success. In the contemporary society doubt and surveillance were natural, and trust often became the cause of betrayal. Through the various dramatic actions of betrayal, Shakespeare explores that betrayal results from the contemporary typical desire of power, wealth, and love, and that the hierarchical and patriarchal order in his contemporary society is in crisis. Therefore the root of Shakespeare’s tragedy lies in betrayal rather than the protagonist’s tragic faults. The sense of loss resulted from betrayal is in the center of Shakespeare’s tragedy. Shakespeare shows how painful it is to live in a world which is full of betrayal and deception. In Shakespeare’s tragic world, the one who betrays for individual success is also betrayed, and cannot escape from the painful and unfortunate reality.

서비스 실패요인이 보복행위에 미치는 영향과 관계품질의 조절효과

김모란,안광호 한국마케팅학회 2012 ASIA MARKETING JOURNAL Vol.14 No.1

Service failure and a poor service recovery may lead loyal customers to try to aggressively punish the service firm. We use perceived betrayal and desire for vengeance as the key constructs to understand customer retaliation. Perceived betrayal is defined as a customer's belief that a firm has intentionally violated what is normative in the context of their relationship. And the desire for vengeance is defined as the retaliatory feelings that consumers feel toward a firm, such as the desire to exert harm on the firm. The perceived betrayal and the desire for vengeance are key antecedents of retaliatory behaviors such as vindictive complaining, negative WOM and third-party complaining for publicity. The empirical results suggest that betrayal is a key motivational factor that lead customers to restore fairness by making use of all means, including retaliation. We also find that relationship quality has effect on a customer's response to a failure in service recovery. As the levels of relationship increases, a violation of the proper fairness has a stronger effect on the sense of betrayal experienced by customers. Considerable research has investigated consumer responses to dissatisfaction. But our study examine the response of outraged and highly frustrated consumers. We focus on emotional and behavioral processes that have not been covered by previous dissatisfaction researches and which are unique to outraged consumers caused by extremely dissatisfied purchase experience. It has recently been pointed out by various mass media that the customers not only have positive effects on the company performance but also put the company in crisis. It has often been reported that one customer's dissatisfaction, for example, never ends as it is, and it tends to grow for retaliating upon the company, depending on the level of seriousness of the dissatisfaction. This sometimes leads to a lawsuit against the company. Our study focuses on the customers' emotional and behavioral responses induced by their extreme dissatisfactions. We divided the customer groups into the customers with high relationship quality and the customers with low relationship quality, and the difference between two groups is examined. The objective of this study is to comprehend the causal relationship between the feeling of betrayal caused by the service failure and the retaliatory behavior triggered by the desire of revenge. Our study is divided into three parts. First, a causal relationship between perceived unfairness and the perceived betrayal and desire for revenge. Second, the effect of the perceived betrayal and desire for revenge on the retaliatory behavior is investigated. Finally, the moderating role of relationship quality in the causal relationship between the unfairness in service recovery and the perceived betrayal is analyzed. This study finds the following empirical results. The distributive unfairness, procedural unfairness and interactional unfairness had significant effects on the perceived betrayal. Especially, the perceived distributive unfairness results in the highest perceived betrayal. When the service company does not provide customers proper and sufficient compensation for the failure, they feel the strong sense of betrayal. And in the causal relationship between the perceived betrayal, desire for revenge and retaliatory behavior, the perceived betrayal has significant effects on e desire for revenge. In addition desire for revenge has significant effects on negative word of mouth, retaliatory complaining behavior and publicity of complaints through third group. Therefore the perceived unfairness has effects on retaliatory behavior through the mediation of the perceived betrayal and desire for revenge. Finally the moderating role of relationship quality was examined in the relationship between the unfairness and perceived betrayal. If the customers experienced the perceived unfairness in the process of service recovery, the customers with... 과거 기업은 고객만족을 통해 고객의 충성도를 구축해 지속적인 이윤을 창출하는데 주로 초점을 맞추었다. 그러나 고객들은 기업에게 긍정적 영향만을 주지 않으며 때로는 기업을 위험에 빠뜨리기도 하고곤란에 처하게 하기도 한다. 서비스실패를 경험한 고객에게 기업이 적절한 서비스 회복조치를 취하지못했을 때 그들은 배신감과 분노 같은 강한 부정적 정서를 느끼며 이러한 부정적 정서는 기업의 성과에상당한 부정적 영향을 미칠 수 있는 공격적 행동이나 보복행동을 유발 할 수 있다. 고객이 느끼는 이러한 부정적 정서는 기업과 오랜 거래관계를 유지하고 그 기업에 대해 애착을 가진 충성고객에게 더 강하게 발생될 수 있다. 강한 배신감을 느낀 충성고객은 단순히 경쟁기업으로 브랜드 전환을 하는데 머무는것이 아니라 온라인 부정적 구전, 불매운동, 언론매체를 통한 호소 등의 강력한 보복행동을 수행한다. 본 연구는 서비스 실패요인으로 발생되는 배신감이라는 감정이 보복욕구를 통해 보복행위까지 가는 인과관계에 대해 알아보고, 기업 간의 충성도가 각기 다른 고객들을 분류하여 그 차이를 살펴보았다. 실증분석 결과 각각의 공정성 훼손은 모두 지각된 배신감에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 고객들은 분배 공정성 훼손으로 인한 서비스 실패를 경험하였을 경우 가장 높게 배신감을지각했으며 절차공정성 훼손으로 인한 서비스 실패를 경험하였을 경우 배신감을 가장 낮게 느끼게하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 지각된 배신감은 보복욕구에 유의한 영향을 미치며 이후 부정구전과 보복적인 불평행동, 제3단체를 통한 불만 홍보와 같은 보복행위 모두에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로나타났다. 따라서 공정성 훼손은 지각된 배신감과 보복욕구와 같은 매개변수를 통하여 보복행위에 영향을 미치는 것으로 볼 수 있다. 마지막으로 공정성 훼손과 지각된 배신감과의 관계에서 과거 해당기업과 고객 간의 관계의 친밀도를 나타내는 관계품질의 조절변수 역할을 검증한 결과 관계품질은 조절변수로서 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 서비스 실패 요인이 보복행위에 미치는 영향을 단순 인과관계로 보지 않고 기업과 고객간의 관계품질의 조절효과를 고려하여 연구를 하였다는 데 그 의의가 있다.

『平家物語』에 나타난 배신의 연구 - 1부: 헤이케(平家)가 당한 배신을 중심으로 -

최재화 일본어문학회 2013 일본어문학 Vol.60 No.-

The war between two clans, Heike and Genji, took a central place in 『Heikemonogatari』. The Heike was beaten by the Genji in Genpeigatsen and it was finally destroyed. In this process, victory or defeat of fight, or the cause of the fall of the Heike was attributable to betrayal. First, when it comes to the betrayal when Kiyomori was alive, there are two kinds by Narichika of the Sisinotani case and Yorimasa, the leader of the Mochihito-O’s rebellion case. Second, the covered betrayal of Gosirakawa-ing after Kiyomori died is explained that after the Heike clan took refuge to Kyushu, their power for the base of support betrayed the Heike. This betrayal was for their safety not for loyalty of Gosirakawa-ing. Third, the betrayer inside the Heike was Yorimori. He betrayed his whole clan as a warrior but it is rationalized as the betrayal for his security. The betrayal to the Heike in 『Heikemonogatari』 ended in failure while Kiyomori lived, because the Heike clan enjoyed the splender and honor during that time. However, after Kiyomori passed away, the whole Heike clan came to be exterminated by power which wanted to betray the Heike, based on a logic that the Heike should be destroye

서비스 실패요인에 따른 소비자의 감정반응과보복행위에 관한 탐색적 연구 : 고객관계품질 수준의 차이를 중심으로*

김모란,안광호 한국마케팅관리학회 2012 마케팅관리연구 Vol.17 No.2

Service failure and a poor service recovery may lead loyal customers to try to aggressively punish the service firm. We use perceived betrayal and desire for vengeance as the key constructs to understand customer retaliation. Perceived betrayal is defined as a customer's belief that a firm has intentionally violated what is normative in the context of their relationship. And the desire for vengeance is defined as the retaliatory feelings that consumers feel toward a firm, such as the desire to exert harm on the firm. The perceived betrayal and the desire for vengeance are key antecedents of retaliatory behaviors such as vindictive complaining, negative WOM and third-party complaining for publicity. The purpose of this qualitative study is to investigate in depth on emotional and behavioral processes that have not been covered by previous dissatisfaction researches and which are unique to outraged consumers caused by extremely dissatisfied purchase experience. The results of in-depth interview show that betrayal is a key motivational factor that lead customers to restore fairness by making use of all means, including retaliation. We also find that relationship quality has effect on a customer's response to a failure in service recovery. As the levels of relationship increases, a violation of the proper fairness has a stronger effect on the sense of betrayal experienced by customers. We divided the customer groups into the customers with high relationship quality and the customers with low relationship quality, and the difference between two groups is examined. We find that the distributive unfairness, procedural unfairness and interactional unfairness had significant effects on the perceived betrayal. When the service company does not provide customers proper and sufficient compensation for the failure, the customers of low relationship quality experienced feel the stronger perceived betrayal than the customers with high relationship quality do. And the perceived betrayal has the positive effect on the desire for revenge. The customers of low relationship quality has desire for revenge negative and show the retaliative behavior such as negative word of mouth, retaliatory complaining behavior and online public complaining. In contrast, customers with high relationship quality show the lower desire for revenge and retaliatory behavior than the customers with low relationship quality. This result can be explained by the forgiveness intention and high level of trust. 본 연구는 서비스 실패(service failure)로 인한 감정의 변화와 이에 따른 보복행위의 다양성에 대한 경험을 ethnographic interview를 통한 심층면접과 부분적인 관찰을 통하여 분석하였다. 본 연구의 정보제공자들은 각자 서비스 실패 이후의 다양한 감정의 경험을 가지고 있었는데, 그 감정은 실망과 분노, 배신감, 포기, 후회, 억울함, 무시당하는 느낌, 복수심 등으로 나타났다. 부정적인 감정을 갖게 된 이후의 행동으로는 직원에게 직접적으로 불만을 표현하기, Complaint Letter를 통해 본인의 서비스 실패사례를 기업에 알리기, 항공사 인터넷 홈페이지에 불만경험담 올리기, SNS를 포함하여 주위사람들에게 부정구전하기 등의 형태로 나타났다. 따라서 본 연구는 서비스 실패 이후의 감정변화와 보복행위에 대한 심층적인 면접을 다시 실시하여 이들 행위에 대한 동기 및 심리적 경험을 분석하여 정리하였다. 또한 이러한 심층면접을 통해 과거의 서비스 제공자에 대한 신뢰나 만족, 몰입이 깊은, 즉 관계품질이 높은 고객과 서비스 제공자에 대한 신뢰와 만족, 몰입이 전혀 없거나 미약한, 즉 관계품질이 낮은 고객은 서비스 실패 이후의 감정적 반응과 보복적 행위에서 큰 차이를 보이는 것으로 나타났다.

『미국인』에 나타난 배신의 양상

이원주 영남대학교 인문과학연구소 2020 人文硏究 Vol.- No.90

Henry James is renowned as an international writer who deals with international theme, namely cultural conflict between old and new continents. However, he explores not only the difference between the values ​​of old and new cultures but also the inner motives and psychology of human beings through the literary material of international theme. His work reflects on human by focusing on the experiences and consequences of a betrayal arising from human relationships built on trust. In particular, James highlights the deepest emotional layers of “American being used and betrayed by Europeans” in The American, an early work of international theme. For example, he captures and depicts the dynamics of a betrayal and various types of men derived from money and manifold motives, centered on the interests of betrayers and the betrayed. In other words, he covers diverse types of betrayals, their motives for a betrayal, the nature of their betrayals, the complex minds and forgiveness of victims of a betrayal, and even the renunciation. James is a so-called modern psychological novelist whose work demonstrates the deepest emotional layers of human beings by associating a betrayal with international theme, which destroys human relationships in breach of trust. 헨리 제임스(Henry James)는 신구 양대륙의 문화 충돌, 즉 국제 주제를 다룬 국제 작가로 저명하다. 그러나 그는 국제 주제라는 문학 소재를 통하여 신구 양문화의 가치 차이에만 치중한 것이 아니라 인간 내면의 동기와 심리를 탐색한다. 그의 작품은 상호 간에 신뢰를 기반으로 형성된 인간관계에서 일어나는 배신의 경험과 결과에 초점을 맞춤으로써 인간에 대한 성찰을 보여준다. 특히 제임스는 국제 주제 초기작품인 『미국인』(The American)에서도 ‘유럽인에 의해 이용당하고 배신당하는 미국인’의 심층을 조명한다. 예컨대 그는 배신자와 배신당하는 자의 이해관계를 중심으로 돈과 여러 동기에서 비롯된 배신의 역학관계와 인간 군상을 포착하여 묘사한다. 다시 말해 그는 다양한 배신의 유형과 배신의 동기, 배신의 속성, 배신으로 인한 피해자의 복잡한 심경과 용서, 그리고 복수 포기라는 결과까지 망라한다. 이른바 제임스는 국제 주제와 신뢰를 위반하여 인간관계를 파괴하는 배신을 결부하여 인간 심층의 감정 단층을 투영한 현대 심리 소설가라고 할 수 있다.

『平家物語』에 나타난 배신의 연구

최재화(崔財華) 일본어문학회 2013 일본어문학 Vol.60 No.-

The war between two clans, Heike and Genji, took a central place in 『Heikemonogatari』. The Heike was beaten by the Genji in Genpeigatsen and it was finally destroyed. In this process, victory or defeat of fight, or the cause of the fall of the Heike was attributable to betrayal. First, when it comes to the betrayal when Kiyomori was alive, there are two kinds by Narichika of the Sisinotani case and Yorimasa, the leader of the Mochihito-O's rebellion case. Second, the covered betrayal of Gosirakawa-ing after Kiyomori died is explained that after the Heike clan took refuge to Kyushu, their power for the base of support betrayed the Heike. This betrayal was for their safety not for loyalty of Gosirakawa-ing. Third, the betrayer inside the Heike was Yorimori. He betrayed his whole clan as a warrior but it is rationalized as the betrayal for his security. The betrayal to the Heike in 『Heikemonogatari』 ended in failure while Kiyomori lived, because the Heike clan enjoyed the splender and honor during that time. However, after Kiyomori passed away, the whole Heike clan came to be exterminated by power which wanted to betray the Heike, based on a logic that the Heike should be destroye

역방향 구성 드라마터지와 관객반응 : 헤롤드 핀터의 『배신』을 중심으로

임도현 ( Do Hyun Rim ) 한국드라마학회 2014 드라마연구 Vol.0 No.44

This essay explores Pinter``s anti-clockwise dramaturgy in his Betrayal, focusing on audience response. The play moves backwards in time except Scene 1, 2 and Scene 5, 6, 7, which move chronologically. That is, it begins with Scene 1(1977) where Jerry meets Emma about two years after their adulterous relationship has finished and ends with Scene 9(1968), where their affair begins. Compared with normal plot dramaturgy, this dramaturgy gives the audience challengeable experiences. In the movement of plot from present to past, the influence of the cinematic technique of the flashback is detected. The main goal of employing the backwards plot deployment is to offer the audience an objective perspective of events in the play. Thanks to the backward plot dramaturgy, the audience pays more attention to the mechanics of betrayal rather than the sexual aspects of the affair. Ultimately, the audience confronts the generalized and abstracted structure of the theme, betrayal, as a result of experiencing various forms of betrayals that pervade in the play. Furthermore, the audience can analyze and criticize the characters in the play instead of sympathizing with them because of knowing the consequence of the play from the beginning. The last scene(Scene 9) shows that Jerry``s betrayal starts from his self-betrayal, which brings out many other betrayals between characters for nine years. The audience is betrayed by the triviality of the incipient nature of betrayal. Finally, the scene also gives the audience an opportunity to witness the effects of time on Emma. In conclusion, this essay argues that Pinter``s dramaturgy of reversing the timeline plays an important role to achieve the writer``s aim of establishing an objective point of view and to allow the audience various theatrical experiences as well. 이 논문은 헤롤드 핀터의 『배신』에 사용된 역방향 구성 드라마터지를 관객반응을 중심으로 연구한다. 극은 처음 1, 2장과 중간 부분의 5, 6, 7장을 제외하고는 모두 비연대기적으로 진행한다. 이러한 드라마터지는 순방향 드라마터지에 비해서 관객에게 상당히 도전적인 경험을 제공한다. 사실 시간의 흐름이 자유로운 드라마터지는 핀터의 영화 시나리오 작가로서의 경험에 기인한 것인데 그가 이러한 영화적 기법을 연극 무대에 전용한 주된 목적은 관객이 극에서 연출되는 사건들에 이성적이고 객관적인 관점을 갖도록 하기 위해서이다. 관객에게 객관적 관점을 제공하기 위한 목적으로 사용된 역방향 구성 드라마터지는 관객이 극의 플롯인 제리와 엠마 그리고 로버트의 삼각관계가 아니라 그들이 서로가 서로에게 가하는 배신들과 그 배신의 기법들에 주목하게 한다. 그 덕분에 관객들은 이 극에 널리 퍼져 있는 다양한 종류의 배신들과 접하게 되고 그 결과 이 극이 배신에 대한 특정한 이야기가 아닌 우리 인간관계에서 경험할 수 있는 모든 배신을 극화하고 있다는 것을 인식할 수 있게 해준다. 또한 극의 처음부터 극의 결말을 알게 하는 역방향 구성 드라마터지는 관객이 극중 인물보다 극의 상황에 더 많은 정보를 갖게 됨으로써 관객이 초월적인 관점을 갖게 한다. 이 덕분에 관객은 극중 인물과 감정적으로 동화되기보다 그들의 행동이나 감정을 객관적인 입장에서 분석하고 비판할 수 있게 된다. 또한 극중 인물의 대사가 내포된 뜻을 제공된 정보에 근거하여 추론하고 분석하여 이해하게 됨으로써 제2의 작가의 역할도 할 수 있게 된다. 극의 마지막 장면인9장에서 관객이 경험하는 것은 좌절감이다. 9년 동안 수 많은 배신이 가능하게한 그 최초의 배신이 관객의 기대와 달리 너무도 미미한 것이기 때문에 이를 목격한 관객은 그 사소함에 배신감을 느끼게 된다. 또한 관객은 극의 마지막을 장식하는 엠마의 모습이 극의 제일 처음인 1장에서와 첨예하게 대비되는 것을통해 시간이 인간에게 가하는 배신 역시 경험하게 된다. 결론적으로 핀터의 역방향 구성 드라마터지는 객관적 관점을 관객에게 제공하려는 그의 의도를 충족시켜 줄 뿐만 아니라 연대기적 극에서는 경험할 수 없는 다양한 관객 경험을 가능하게 한다고 할 수 있다.

패션 기업의 비윤리적 행위가 소비자 실망감과 배신감 및 관계단절행동에 미치는 영향 –행위 심각성의 조절 효과를 중심으로-

박성희,이선명 한국니트디자인학회 2019 패션과 니트 Vol.17 No.1

The purpose of this study is to classify the concepts and types of unethical behaviors of fashion companies and to investigate the effect of unethical behaviors of fashion firms on consumer disappointment, betrayal and disconnection behavior, The results are as follows. First, unethical behaviors of fashion companies have a significant effect on CEO related and service related to CEO disappointment, product related, service related, and marketing related factors. Second, the behavioral severity between unethical behavior, betrayal and disappointment of fashion firms showed moderating effect, especially the meaningful value of betrayal. Third, the disappointment and betrayal of the unethical behavior of the fashion companies influenced the negative and negative intention of the relationship. First, the unethical behaviors of the fashion companies are the unethical behaviors related to the CEO, the unethical behaviors related to the products, the unethical behaviors related to marketing, the unethical behaviors related to the service, Unethical behavior, and service-related unethical behavior Second, the behavioral severity between unethical behavior, betrayal and disappointment of fashion firms showed moderating effect, especially the meaningful value of betrayal. Third, the disappointment and betrayal of unethical behaviors of fashion firms influenced negative and negative intention of disconnection, especially negative intentions.

제조공장 유형이 본질 전이와 소비자의 가치 인식에 미치는 영향: 안전제품 배신을 중심으로

정헌배,이용주 한국벤처창업학회 2016 벤처창업연구 Vol.11 No.5

In order to extend FOO, this research has the object to demonstrate existing the difference of transferred essence and value between the types of factories(Original factory vs Extended factory). A safety product should save consumers from possible harm or risk, but it sometimes gives directly some damage to consumers. For example, like the issue of a germicide problem in 2016, a germicide killed consumers because of harmful chemistry even it should kept their health. This situation refer to 'Safety product betrayal', we expected that safety product betrayal presence/absence conditions moderate the relationship between types of factories, transferred essence and value. We selected a car air-bag as a safety product for study and implemented one study with total 213 participants. As a result, the participants evaluated the value of an air-bag manufactured throughout an original factory higher than the value of an air-bag manufactured throughout an extended factory. Futhermore, they evaluated the transferred brand essence of an original factory's air-bag higher than an extended factory's. However, in the safety product betrayal presence condition, the difference of value and transferred essence between an original factory and an extend factory was disappeared. Indeed, once consumers experienced or saw safety product betrayal, they avoided to buy or use safety products. Therefore, consumers evaluated the value and transferred essence of betrayed safety products is low without the types of manufacturing factories. From the past to now, there was no paper about the relationship between the types of manufacturing factories(Orignal factory vs Extended factory) and safety product betrayal in Korea. Therefore, this research on FOO and safety product betrayal can give new theoretical and operational contribution. In the conclusion, we discussed the contribution of the study results and proposed the limitation and future study. FOO 학문을 확장시키기 위해 본 연구는 제조공장 유형(본점 공장 vs 분점 공장)에 따라 안전제품에 전이되는 브랜드 본질의 정도와 가치가 달라진다는 것을 증명하고자 하는 목적을 가지고 있다. 안전제품이란, 발생할 수 있는 피해나 위험으로부터 소비자를 보호해야 하는 제품을 가리키지만 때때로 소비자에게 직접적인 피해를 주는 주체가 되기도 한다. 예를 들어, 2016년에 화두가 된 가습기 살균제 사건처럼 세균을 없애 소비자의 건강을 지켜주어야 하는 살균제가 해로운 화학성분을 가지고 있어 소비자가 사망하는 경우를 말한다. 이와 같은 경우를 '안전제품 배신'이라고 지칭하며, 본 연구에서는 안전제품 배신의 유(有)/무(無)가 제조공장 유형과 본질 전이, 가치 간의 관계를 조절 할 것이라고 예측하였다. 총 213명의 피험자들을 대상으로 자동차 에어백을 가지고 실증 연구를 진행한 결과, 피험자들은 분점 공장에서 제조된 자동차 에어백보다 본점 공장에서 제조된 자동차 에어백의 가치가 더 높다고 평가하였으며, 전이된 브랜드의 본질 역시 분점 공장의 제품보다 본점 공장의 제품이 더 크다고 느끼는 것으로 나타났다. 하지만 반대로 자동차 에어백이 배신을 일으킨 경우, 제조공장 유형 간에 존재했던 가치와 본질 전이의 차이가 없어지는 결과가 도출되었다. 이는 소비자들이 안전제품 배신을 경험하거나 목격했다면 안전제품의 사용이나 구매를 회피하려는 경향을 보이게 되고, 이로 인해 제조공장 유형에 상관없이 배신을 일으킨 안전제품에 대해 가치나 본질 전이가 낮다고 평가하는 것이다. 현재까지 한국에서는 본점과 분점으로 나누어 제조공장 유형 간의 가치 차이를 보거나 안전제품 배신을 적용한 연구가 존재하지 않았다. 그러므로 본 연구에서 FOO 학문과 안전제품 배신을 통합하여 연구를 진행한 것은 새로운 학문적 기여도와 실무적 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것이라 판단된다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 연구 결과를 통해 도출된 시사점을 논의하였으며, 한계점 및 향후 연구방향에 대해 제시하였다.

전역 육군 장교의 군대 폭력 경험이 대군신뢰도에 미치는 영향: 조직 배신의 매개효과를 중심으로

정빈,김민지 육군사관학교 화랑대연구소 2022 한국군사학논집 Vol.78 No.1

The study aimed at verifying the mediating effects of the ‘institutional betrayal’ in the relationship between military violence and trust in the military by analyzing a survey of 105 discharged Korean army officers between 2019 and 2021. This study categorized military violence into 7 types: verbal abuse, physical abuse, bullying, rape or attempted rape, sexual molestation, sexual harassment, digital sex crime(illegal filming), and stalking. The survey includes questions about the experience of military violence, institutional betrayal, and general trust in the military. The results were as follows: (1) Verbal abuse have positively correlated with the physical abuse, bullying, sexual molestation, and sexual harassment. (2) The respondents who reported at least one type of military violence reported a higher perception of institutional betrayal than those who did not report any experience of military violence. (3) Those who reported sexual violence experience have a higher perception of institutional betrayal when compared to those who experienced non-sexual crime and people who did not report any experience of violence. (4) Institutional betrayal has a mediating effect in the relationship between the experience of military violence and trust in the military. Finally, the implications and the limitations of the study were discussed.