http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
On the Relation between Phonetics and Phonology
( Woo Hyeok Chang ) 경희대학교 언어연구소 2012 언어연구 Vol.29 No.1
Chang Woohyeok. 2012, On the Relation between Phonetics and Phonology, Linguistic Research 29(1), 127-156. This study examines the nature of the relationship between phonology and phonetics and advocates a modular view in which there is a principled mapping between phonological representations and phonetic expressions. In particular, this modular view is advocated by Laboratory Phonology that can be characterized by two beliefs. First, it is believed that there should be a division between phonetics and phonology. Second, there should be a considerable interconnection between them. Contrary to this modular view, other approaches are somewhat radical in that abstract phonological features are not associated with phonetic facts and that phonetics and phonology are integrated into a single module which is all phonetic. In favor of the modular theory, I propose a principle about phonology-phonetics interface: unmarked items display a wider range of phonetic realization but cannot be realized in a more marked way than their marked counterparts, One representative evidence would be that the higher pitch value of a tone compared with other tones has to be a phonological high tone rather than a low tone. Further discussions about phonology-phonetics interface are done with regard to speech perception and production. It is shown that perception and production data are valid when they are used as phonetic evidence to resolve phonological controversies. On the other hand, the P-map hypothesis seems invalid when dealing with some cases where speech production and perception do not match.
On the Relation between Phonetics and Phonology
장우혁 경희대학교 언어정보연구소 2012 언어연구 Vol.29 No.1
This study examines the nature of the relationship between phonology and phonetics and advocates a modular view in which there is a principled mapping between phonological representations and phonetic expressions. In particular, this modular view is advocated by Laboratory Phonology that can be characterized by two beliefs. First, it is believed that there should be a division between phonetics and phonology. Second, there should be a considerable interconnection between them. Contrary to this modular view, other approaches are somewhat radical in that abstract phonological features are not associated with phonetic facts and that phonetics and phonology are integrated into a single module which is all phonetic. In favor of the modular theory, I propose a principle about phonology-phonetics interface: unmarked items display a wider range of phonetic realization but cannot be realized in a more marked way than their marked counterparts. One representative evidence would be that the higher pitch value of a tone compared with other tones has to be a phonological high tone rather than a low tone. Further discussions about phonology-phonetics interface are done with regard to speech perception and production. It is shown that perception and production data are valid when they are used as phonetic evidence to resolve phonological controversies. On the other hand, the P-map hypothesis seems invalid when dealing with some cases where speech production and perception do not match.
어간의 음운정보가 영어 파생형태 적격성 판단에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
이용은(Lee Yong eun) 한국영어학학회 2016 영어학연구 Vol.22 No.3
Previous studies have reported that even highly-advanced learners of English as a foreign language exhibit significant difficulties in properly acquiring English derivational morphology, as exemplified by the learners’ production of various illicit derivative forms such as minimizement and survivation (Schmitt & Zimmerman, 2002). The present study explores the possibility that non-native speakers’ difficulty involving forming well-formed derivative forms may in part lie in their lack of sufficient knowledge of the phonological generalizations of the stems to which English derivational suffixes are attached. To this end, this study first performed a lexicon study in an attempt to identify the exemplary phonological patterns of the stems to which a total of six English derivational suffixes are attached. Based on the lexicon study, the present study performed two wordlikeness judgment tasks, examining how the identified phonological generalizations from the lexicon study modulate acceptability judgments of English derived nonwords by native English speakers vs. highly-advanced Korean learners of English. Findings from the two acceptability studies suggest that the two language groups differ systematically in utilizing the exemplary phonological patterns of stems in their acceptability judgment of English derivative nonwords. This study concludes that the degree to which a Korean speaker masters the phonological patterns of the English stems with which English derivational suffixes combine may play a key role in facilitating the acquisition of English derivational morphology for Korean learners of English.